The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The American voter revisited
Abstract
presidential elections of 2000 and 2004 will be remembered as two of the most contentious and polarizing political events in American history.In an attempt to understand what happened during these historic elections, The American Revisited recreates the outstanding classic from 1960, The American Voter, following the same format, theory, and mode of analysis as the original.The American Revisited examines how contemporary voters decide, using the lens of the 1960 text, which was based on the presidential elections of 1952 and 1956. In this new volume, the ideas and methods of The American Voter are tested against presidential election surveys from 2000 and 2004. In a fascinating account, the contemporary American voter is found to behave politically in a fashion surprisingly similar to voters of the 1950s. Yet, some things have changed. For one, the recent intense polarization of the two leading political parties has heightened the ideological tenor of American politics.The organization of The American Revisited follows closely the original book. Its fifteen chapters - about political attitudes, the political context, the social and economic context, and the electoral decision - parallel chapters in The American Voter, from the title itself to the style to the analytical framework. aim is to reproduce the theory and the tables of the original but with an entirely new and up-to-date data set. In particular, where The American Voter concentrated on an understanding of voters through examination of the National Presidential Election Surveys of 1952 and 1956, this book studies the National Presidential Election Surveys of 2000 and 2004. In addition, each chapter includes a Comment and Controversy section, which brings the reader up-to-date on the numerous scholarly and political questions that the material of the chapter has generated over the years.Just as The American Voter turned out to be a model text, The American Revisited is sure to become a classic in the study of voter behavior and psychology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"
Mansbridge, J. (1999) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2647821 · Cited by 2,939
Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study
Petrocik, J. R. (1996) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111797 · Cited by 2,902
Spatial Models of Party Competition
Stokes, D. E. (1963) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952828 · Cited by 1,964
The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment
Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585837 · Cited by 1,380
On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?
Druckman, J. N. (2001) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00100 · Cited by 1,306
Why Americans hate welfare: race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-2440 · Cited by 1,173
Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00033 · Cited by 1,167
Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674429147 · Cited by 1,119
Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: the Role of Core Beliefs and Values
Feldman, S. (1988) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111130 · Cited by 1,085
The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President
Fair, R. C. (1978) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1924969 · Cited by 964
Cited by
Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity
HUDDY, L., MASON, L., & AARØE, L. (2015) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000604 · Cited by 1,415
Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together. Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data
Barbera, P. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2108098 · Cited by 983
Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data
Barberá, P. (2015) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpu011 · Cited by 982
Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate
BULLOCK, J. G. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000165 · Cited by 777
GERBER, A. S., & HUBER, G. A. (2009) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055409990098 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-02-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 46-3522-46-3522
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1577954649
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 57
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The American voter revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-3522
- The paper
- The American voter revisited. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-3522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.