Cited by 22Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

Painting all foreigners with one brush? How the salience of muslims and refugees shapes judgements

Open access
Wallrich, Lukas, West, Keon, Rutland, Adam·2020·Journal of Social and Political Psychology

Abstract

Attitudes towards foreigners are widely researched, most frequently in survey studies. However, in that context it is often unclear which attitude object respondents have in mind, and thus what their answers refer to. This paper uses a representative sample of 3,195 Germans who reported which groups they think of when thinking about foreigners living in Germany. We found that Germans disproportionately think of groups who are Muslim, and that such salience is associated with more negative attitudes towards “foreigners.” This holds true when controlling for attitudes towards Muslims; in fact, thinking of Muslim groups when thinking about foreigners moderates the relationship between anti-Muslim and anti-foreigner attitudes. The relationships were weaker when respondents think of Turks, a large and long-standing minority in Germany, suggesting an attenuation of the links through familiarity or intergroup contacts. No relationship was found between thinking of refugees and attitudes towards foreigners. Implications for research are discussed, particularly regarding the interpretation of self-reported attitudes towards foreigners and the study of populist strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1283

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a representative sample of Germans, when asked whom they think of when thinking about foreigners living in Germany, Germans disproportionately think of Muslims, and this salience is associated with more negative attitudes toward foreigners overall.

    “Wallrich et al. (2020) find that when asked whom they think of when thinking about foreigners living in Germany, Germans disproportionately think of Muslims, and this salience is associated with more negative attitudes toward foreigners overall (see also Asbrock et al. 2014).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Wallrich et al. 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallrich, L., West, K., & Rutland, A.
Affiliations
  • Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Published
2020-02-28
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
246-265
ISSN
2195-3325 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008078363
Cited by
22
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Social and Political Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe’s Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths Research Online (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PschyOpen (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Psychology Archives (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
attitudes toward foreigners, Muslims, refugees, group salience, anti-foreigner attitudes, Islamophobia, Turks, intergroup contact, familiarity, populist strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review