Cited by 60Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

ChatGPT and other AI Users: Innovative and Creative Utilitarian Value and Mindset Shift

Open access
Arvin V. Duhaylungsod, Jason V. Chavez·2023·Journal of Namibian Studies : History Politics Culture

Abstract

With the advent of ChatGPT and other AI technologies, technology-based learners have gained access to a new tool that offers relief and support in their academic pursuits. ChatGPT, powered by OpenAI's language model, has the ability to generate ideas, provide information, and assist in various tasks. This research aims to explore the relief that ChatGPT provides to technology-based learners by examining its utilitarian value and its impact on enhancing innovative and creative skills. By understanding the benefits and limitations of ChatGPT, educators and learners can harness its potential to improve learning outcomes and navigate the challenges associated with AI integration in education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.59670/jns.v33i.2791

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Enago Academy. (2023). Will ChatGPT Disrupt Peer Review? Impact of AI on the Hallmark of Science Vigilance. Enago Academy [Online]. https://www.enago.com/academy/chatgpt-disrupt-peer-review- science-vigilance/ (accessed 13 July 2023)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duhaylungsod, A. V., & Chavez, J. V.
Affiliations
Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University (PH)
Venue
Journal of Namibian Studies : History Politics Culture
Published
2023-03-20
Volume
33
ISSN
  • 1863-5954 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-5523
OpenAlex
W4386036009
Cited by
59
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 6
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Namibian Studies History Politics Culture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, artificial intelligence in education, utilitarian value, innovative skills, creative abilities, academic support, learning outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review