The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication
Open accessAbstract
This article develops a conceptual framework for understanding how intercultural communication, mediated by cultural artifacts (i.e., Internet communication tools), creates compelling, problematic, and surprising conditions for additional language learning.Three case studies of computer-mediated intercultural engagement draw together correlations between discursive orientation, communicative modality, communicative activity, and emergent interpersonal dynamics.These factors contribute to varying qualities and quantities of participation in the intercultural partnerships.Case one, "Clashing Frames of Expectation --Differing Cultures-of-Use," suggests that the cultures-of-use of Internet communication tools, their perceived existence and on-going construction as distinctive cultural artifacts, differs interculturally just as communicative genre, pragmatics, and institutional context would be expected to differ interculturally.Case two, "Intercultural Communication as Hyperpersonal Engagement," illustrates pragmatic and linguistic development as an outcome of intercultural relationship building.The final case study, "The Wrong Tool for the Right Job?," describes a recent generational shift in communication tool preference wherein an ostensibly ubiquitous tool, e-mail, is shown to be unsuitable for mediating age peer relationships.Taken together, these case studies demonstrate that Internet communication tools are not neutral media.Rather, individual and collective experience is shown to influence the ways students engage in Internet-mediated communication with consequential outcomes for both the processes and products of language development.For some social classes and in highly privileged geographical regions, we have entered into a period of rapid and efficient global communication practices mediating an array of interpersonal, discursivematerial, and cultural activities.Despite the robust connections between the increasing digitization of everyday communicative practice and issues such as globalization and homogenization, Internet-mediated intercultural educational activities remain demonstrably polymorphous.Reasons for this are many.Educational cultures and objectives vary across nation state boundaries (Belz, 2002) as well as across educational institutions within the US.Moreover, within the same university but across courses or time periods, student populations shift, pedagogical goals are reassessed, and micro-interactional phenomena illustrate their own "accentuality" (Volosinov, 1973), even when the task, as it were, is supposed to remain consistent across participants and time (Coughlan & Duff, 1994).The focus of this article is yet another dimension of human heterogeneity --the cultural embeddedness of Internet communication tools and the consequences of this embedding for communicative activity.Three case studies will be presented which illustrate some of the possibilities and problems associated with foreign language intercultural interaction mediated by Internet communication tools.I argue that Internet communication tools, like all human artifacts, are cultural tools (for an extension of this argument to the natural environment and the social construction of nature, see Braun & Castree, 1998;Harvey, 1996;Williams, 1980).Specifically, I show that e-mail, instant messenger, and forms of synchronous chat, are deeply affected by the cultures-of-use, or to borrow a biological term --phenotypic characteristics, evolving from the manner in which these tools mediate everyday communicative practice.To unpack this somewhat, most of the American students in the case studies have extensive Internet experience that catalyzes specific forms (and expectations) of communication.In turn, the resulting Steven L. Thorne Artifacts and Cultures-of-Use in Intercultural CommunicationLanguage Learning & Technology 39 communicative dynamics are consequential for both the processes and products of language learning.Importantly, these case studies span a 5-year period and in so doing demonstrate that the cultures-of-use of Internet communication tools are rapidly evolving, if in geographically non-uniform directions, and play a critical role in the manner in which intercultural communication plays out in formal educational contexts.Of particular relevance to foreign language uses of "telecollaboration" (implying interaction mediated by Internet communication tools), I will include a critical discussion of recent Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) research (Walther, 1994(Walther, , 1996(Walther, , 1997) ) and will build on a theoretical framework that can broadly be termed a cultural-historical perspective of human communication and cognition (e.g., Bruner, 1995;Cole, 1996;Hanks, 1996;Levinson, 1995;Rommetveit, 1974;van der Veer & Valsiner, 1991).This approach emphasizes the process whereby individuals modify, transform, and comprehend artifacts and environments (e.g., Bødker, 1997;Cole & Engestrom, 1993;Kapetlinin, 199
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A number of recent studies found that the contradictions may also take place because of the misalignment of academic calendars, institutionalized classroom scripts, methods of learning accreditation, academic socialization and technological access (Belz, 2002;Belz & Muller-Hartmann, 2003;O'Dowd, 2005;Thorne, 2003).”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Thorne (2003), for example, in his study demonstrates how the learners' relationship with physical contexts and computers may facilitate contradictions.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Internet communication tools are often”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Thorne (2003) and Wertsch, Minick, and Arns (1984) showed how the same task is implemented differently by means of available tools across different socio-cultural contexts.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The most recent studies on telecollaboration (Belz, 2001(Belz, , 2002(Belz, , 2003;;Belz & Muller-Hartmann, 2003;Belz & Thorne, 2006;Chase, Macfadyen, Reeder & Roche, 2002;Kramsch & Thorne, 2002;O'Dowd, 2003O'Dowd, , 2005;;Schneider & von der Emde, 2006;Thorne, 2003Thorne, , 2006;;Ware, 2005) explore the kinds of cultural contact afforded by a technological medium.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Thorne concludes that radically different cultures-of-use of Internet communication was one of the major reasons for the tension between the French and American students.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These studies emphasize the importance of physical contexts consisting of mediating tools and other people in shaping an online interaction.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These contradictions were catalyzed by the clash of curricula versus interactive learning paradigms (Lemke, 1998): the outcomes of different cultures-of-use of computer technologies (Thorne, 2003), instructors' mediation, and resources available to learners within their broader sociocultural contexts.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Thorne (2003) argues that for successful intercultural and international telecollaboration to take place and in order for Internet-mediated interpersonal or hyperpersonal relationships to develop, there should be certain minimum alignment of cultures-of-use.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne (2003)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“AT can help illuminate challenges related to cultures of use of tools (see Thorne, 2003) occurring when students 'approach [a] new task with old habits' (Blin, 2004, p. 167).”
From Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology (2008) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M. E. F., Lave, J., & Wenger, É. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,362
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Bhabha, H. Κ. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203820551 · Cited by 18,106
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,591
Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0597 · Cited by 12,654
Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage
Brown, P. (1987) · Cited by 11,901
5. The Practice of Everyday Life
Liu, X. (2000) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520923478-008 · Cited by 10,752
Butler, J. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203828274 · Cited by 10,468 · cited 1×
“…that the process of becoming a competent member of one digitally mediated speech community may have demonstrable effects on presentation of self and the aesthetics of communicative performativity (e.g., Butler, 1993; Cameron, 2000) in another, quite dissimilar digitally mediated interaction.”
Corsaro, W. A., & Bourdieu, P. (1992) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579985 · Cited by 9,968 · cited 1×
“Communicative activity articulates with and is a form of material culture (Bourdieu, 1991; Gee, 1990; Lemke, 1995; The New London Group, 1996).”
Background(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4888 · Cited by 9,298
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: A morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Bruner, J. (1995). Meaning and self in a cultural perspective. In D. Bakhurst & C. Sypnowich (Eds.), The social self (pp. 18-29). London: Sage Publications.
- In S. Chaiklin (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 15-34). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
- Cole, M., Hood, L., & McDermott, R. (1997). Concepts of ecological validity: Their differing implications for comparative cognitive research. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and actvivity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (pp. 49-58). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Lantolf, J. (in press). Sociocultural theory and SLA: An exegesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (in press). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Lexington, MA: D.C.Heath. Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 97-114). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Thorne, S. (1999). An activity theoretical analysis of electronic foreign language discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
- Thorne, S. (2000b). Second language acquisition and the truth(s) about relativity. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 219-244). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
- In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 245-259). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- van Lier, L. (in press). The ecology of language learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wilkinson, S. (1996). Foreign language conversation and the study abroad transition: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Pennsylvania State University.
- Wylie, L., & Brière, J. F. (1995). Les Français (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 572
Learner beliefs and corrective feedback in telecollaboration: A longitudinal investigation
Akiyama, Y. (2017) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.007 · Cited by 72
The Dynamics of L2 Self and L2 Learning Motivation: A Qualitative Case Study of Korean ESL Students
김태영 (2009) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.64.3.200909.133 · Cited by 64
“For example, English learning (an activity) can take the form of attending traditional ESL classes or taking on-line CALL courses (two actions) (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundRusk, F., & Pörn, M. (2019) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2019.02.003 · Cited by 56
“A second wave of research on L2 learning in digitally mediated interaction promoted a view on context and interaction beyond the textual chats and, thus, moved towards more qualitative methods and socioculturally influenced theories (Belz, 2002; Darhower, 2002; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundLanguage Learning, Ecological Validity, and Innovation under Conditions of Superdiversity
Thorne, S. L. (2013) · Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature · doi:10.5565/rev/jtl3.526 · Cited by 54
“…this study is that issues of cultural, linguistic, and technological hegemony are explicitly foregrounded in the analysis, an issue that has been raised as an important but under-explored aspect of OIE in prior research (e.g., Ess, 2009; Guth & Helm, 2010b; Lamy & Goodfellow, 2009; Thorne, 2003).”
ResultSelf-citationCMC Technologies for Teaching Foreign Languages
Lafford, P. A., & Lafford, B. A. (2005) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.679-709 · Cited by 54
“Following Willis (1996) and Skehan (1996, 1998), Hadley (2004) states that “Task and Task-Based Learning .”
MethodGoodfellow, R., & Hewling, A. (2005) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.355 · Cited by 53
“This perspective draws on more recent work on intercultural communication (Scollon & Wong-Scollon, 2001; Thorne, 2003), the social conditions of virtual community (e.g. S.G. Jones, 1998a; Werry & Mowbray, 2001) and ideas around cultures of cyberspace (Poster, 2001).”
BackgroundBlogging in Foreign Language Education
Carney, N. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch016 · Cited by 52
Network-Based Language Teaching
Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02246-8_30 · Cited by 52
The multiple contexts of online language teaching
Lund, A. (2006) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168806lr191oa · Cited by 47
“Other researchers have also pointed to this connection between expanded contexts and transformed language practices (Kern et al., 2004; Lund, 2001; 2003; 2004a; Thorne, 2002; Warschauer, 1999; 2000b; 2002).”
BackgroundThe Intercultural Communicative Competence and Digital Education
Boubekri, A. E. (2017) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239516670994 · Cited by 51
“The literature on the use of social media in EFL accentuates the remarkable opportunities they open for authentic interaction and motivation while students are involved in prolonged contact (Thorne, 2003) and engaging synchronous or asynchronous exchanges .”
BackgroundDiscourse and Identity among ESL Learners: A Case Study of a Community College ESL Classroom
Chang, Y.-C., & Sperling, M. (2014) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte201425911 · Cited by 51
Writing/thinking in real time: digital video and corpus query analysis
Park, K., & Kinginger, C. (2010) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44225 · Cited by 50
“Language Learning & Technology http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num3/parkkinginger.pdf October 2010, Volume 14, Number 3 pp. 31–50 Copyright © 2010, ISSN 1094-3501 31 WRITING/THINKING IN REAL TIME: DIGITAL VIDEO AND CORPUS QUERY ANALYSIS”
BackgroundKopish, M. A., & Marques, W. (2020) · Research in Social Sciences and Technology · doi:10.46303/ressat.05.01.3 · Cited by 50
Establishing professional online communities for world language educators
Knight, S. W. P. (2020) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12458 · Cited by 58
ESL students' computer-mediated communication practices: Context configuration
Shin, D. (2006) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44075 · Cited by 48
“The most salient interactional norm in the ESL participants' chat meetings was helping each other to save face in communication (see Belz & Kinginger, 2002, 2003; Kinginger, 2000; O'Dowd, 2003; Thorne, 2003; Ware, 2005 for the issue of face in CMC).”
BackgroundOskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2014) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.6.05osk · Cited by 47
Chun, D. M. (2007) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v24i2.239-252 · Cited by 46
Negotiating Differences: Instructors' Reflections on Challenges in International Telecollaboration
Basharina, O., Guardado, M., & Morgan, T. (2008) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.65.2.275 · Cited by 46
“These differences were mainly due to the differences in the cultures-of-use of computer technologies (Thorne, 2003) in the three instructional contexts, which the instructors reflect upon in the findings section.”
BackgroundInfluentialPedagogy, Purpose, and the Second Language Learner in On-Line Communities
Potts, D. (2005) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.1353/cml.2005.0045 · Cited by 45
“…graduate classrooms (Leki, 2001; Morita, 2001, 2004) and of studies of CMCmediated cross-cultural communication (Belz, 2003; Kramsch & Thorne, 2002; Thorne, 2003, 2000) in terms of the opportunities afforded to NNSs to make meaningful contributions to knowledge construction while simultaneously…”
BackgroundInfluentialUsing Facebook Data to Analyze Learner Interaction During Study Abroad
Back, M. (2013) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12036 · Cited by 52
Exploring the Interface of Interlanguage (L2) Pragmatics and Digital Spaces
Sykes, J. M., & González‐Lloret, M. (2020) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.40433 · Cited by 43
“As Thorne (2003, 2016) has argued before, many forms of communication that are mediated by technology can be seen as a case of double intercultural communication: that of the culture(s) of the participants and the culture of the digital space and tool used.”
BackgroundMicroblogging Activities: Language Play and Tool Transformation
Hattem, D. (2014) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44374 · Cited by 43
“These students brought to their experience with Twitter sustained, cultures-of-use (Thorne, 2003) with a variety of digital communication tools in non-academic speech communities.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCuster, L., & Tuominen, A. (2016) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.1177/0092055x16679488 · Cited by 43
“…such as for learning activities in foreign language courses, communications tools that are now ubiquitous in campus learning management systems have been used to create virtual learning activities between students (Kinginger, Gourvès-Hayward, and Simpson 1999; Liaw 2006; O’Dowd 2003; Thorne 2003).”
BackgroundHafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429452437 · Cited by 42
Peer-reviewing in an intercultural wiki environment - student interaction and reflections
Bradley, L. (2014) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2014.09.008 · Cited by 42
Alignment During Synchronous Video Versus Written Chat L2 Interactions: A Methodological Exploration
Michel, M. C., & Cappellini, M. (2019) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190519000072 · Cited by 36
“Even if sociocultural studies provide conceptual tools through which they conceive data analysis and language instruction (e.g., Thorne, 2003), they lack power for generalization.”
BackgroundTechnologies for Teaching and Learning L2 Grammar
Heift, T., & Vyatkina, N. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781118914069.ch3 · Cited by 41
Computer‐Mediated Communication
Thorne, S. L. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_108 · Cited by 43
Self-citationOnline Language Teacher Education: Practices and Possibilities
Shin, D., & Kang, H.-S. (2018) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688217716535 · Cited by 33
“In a similar vein, previous studies (e.g. Thorne, 2003) have further reported that varying discourses pertaining to Internet communication tools (e.g. email, chat rooms, discussion forums) across different social groups and/or countries shape CMC activities among language learners.”
ResultNetwork‐Based Language Teaching
Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_105 · Cited by 40
Blended Learning in Teacher Education: An Investigation of Classroom Community Across Media
Lord, G., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008) · Cited by 39
The types and effects of peer native speakers’ feedback on CMC
Díez-Bedmar, M. B., & Pérez-Paredes, P. (2012) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44275 · Cited by 39
“While sociocognitive and sociocultural perspectives have stressed the role of (a) intercultural communication and exploration (Belz, 2003; Firth & Wagner, 1997; O’Dowd, 2003, 2006), (b) the cultural influences on online communication (Thorne, 2003), and (c) the concept of literacy as applied to digital communication t…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialJenks, C. J. (2009) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220802613781 · Cited by 38
“Although the literature has moved on from describing the communicative characteristics of StCMC (see Androutsopoulos, 2006; e.g., Thorne, 2003), advances to CMC technology have required us to go back to our descriptive roots.”
BackgroundGenerative artificial intelligence, co‐evolution, and language education
Thorne, S. L. (2024) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12932 · Cited by 37
Self-citationGetting acquainted in Skypecasts: aspects of social organization in online chat rooms
Jenks, C. J. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00211.x · Cited by 37
Coconstructing Learning: The Dynamic Nature of Foreign Language Pedagogy in a CMC Environment
Deusen-Scholl, N. V., Frei, C., & Dixon, E. M. (2013) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.657-678 · Cited by 29
“, their homes or dorm rooms) and the world at large since the Internet allows students different modes of access to the target language and culture (see Chenoweth & Murday, 2003; Hanna & de Nooy, 2003; Thorne, 2003; Belz, 2002; Müller-Hartmann, 2000; Gray & Stockwell, 1998).”
BackgroundReinhardt, J. S., & Ryu, J. (2013) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.2013070102 · Cited by 42
“Unique socio-pragmatic conventions and cultures-of-use (Thorne, 2003) emerge in these textualized practices, afforded by various features of SNS technology.”
BackgroundSecond-language Discourse in the Digital World
Vandergriff, I. (2016) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.46 · Cited by 38
Cañado, M. L. P. (2010) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221003666222 · Cited by 35
“Thus, the project has been an instance of blended learning (O'Dowd 2007 ; Thorne, 2003 ), as traditional face-to-face interaction and online activity have mutually reinforced each other within it.”
BackgroundMultiuser Digital Games as Sites for Research and Practice
Sykes, J. M., Reinhardt, J. S., & Thorne, S. L. (2010) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9136-9_8 · Cited by 38
Self-citationCultura no ensino de língua estrangeira
Kramsch, C. (2017) · Bakhtiniana Revista de Estudos do Discurso · doi:10.1590/2176-457333606 · Cited by 34
Critical Approaches to Online Intercultural Language Education
Helm, F. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_18 · Cited by 34
Second Language Teaching and Learning with Technology: Views of Emergent Researchers
Thouësny, E. S., & Bradley, L. (2011) · doi:10.14705/rpnet.2011.9781908416001 · Cited by 38
A Critical Review of Research on Social Networking Sites in Language Teaching and Learning
Solmaz, O. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cet.444120 · Cited by 33
“Another issue that has to be taken into account is the culture of use (Thorne, 2003), the way a particular technology is adopted and used in a group, geographical area, or country.”
BackgroundAnderson, P. V., Bergman, B., Bradley, L., Gustafsson, M., & Matzke, A. (2010) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651910363270 · Cited by 33
“…educators have begun to experiment with and theorize about virtual learning environments in which students from different countries interact in order to learn how to participate effectively in a global society (Herrington, 2008; Paretti & McNair, 2008; Starke-Meyerring, 2005; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundOnline gaming as sociable media
Thorne, S. L., & Fischer, I. (2012) · Alsic · doi:10.4000/alsic.2450 · Cited by 33
“Ces pratiques créent des cultures d'usage dy namiques : on observ e une év olution parallèle des outils de communication et des activ ités humaines qu'ils suscitent (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChung, Y.-G., Graves, B., Wesche, M., & Barfurth, M. A. (2005) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.1353/cml.2005.0040 · Cited by 33
“Specifically, studies conclude that Internet chat is helpful in creating linguistic interaction and offers the language teacher a tool to ‘locate specific developmental episodes’ (Thorne, 2003) and create different types of interaction between students (Sierra, 1999; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialOtto, S. E. K. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118914069.ch2 · Cited by 40
Replication Studies in CALL Research
Chun, D. M. (2012) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.29.4.591-600 · Cited by 32
Electronic Discourse in Language Learning and Language Teaching
Abraham, L. B., & Williams, L. (2009) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.25 · Cited by 31
Wang, Y., & Chen, N. (2010) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494821003769081 · Cited by 31
“For example, the majority of the research on synchronous collaboration investigates the potentials of text-based interaction via text chat (e.g. Belz & Thorne, 2005; Chun, 1994; Darhower, 2008; Lee, 2004; Sotillo, 2000, 2006; Thorne, 2003; Tudini, 2003).”
BackgroundVandergriff, I. (2016) · Cited by 30
Pragmatics, tasks, and technology
González‐Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2018) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.10.08gon · Cited by 30
Making meaning online: computer-mediated communication for language learning
Hampel, R. (2014) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 30
Social media literacy in L2 environments: navigating anonymous user-generated content
Yeh, E., & Swinehart, N. (2020) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1830805 · Cited by 36
“…literature also reveals that in addition to linguistic proficiency, background information and knowledge of target language culture and contemporary issues were also key factors for successful participation online (Dias, 2000; Duff, 2001; Thorne, 2003; Thorne & Black, 2007; Yamashita, 2019).”
BackgroundConstructing a ‘third space’ for EFL learners: Where language and cultures meet
Liaw, M. (2007) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344007000821 · Cited by 30
“Recently, efforts have been made by language educators and researchers to use computer technology to assist L2 learners’ growth in either linguistic or intercultural competence (Belz, 2002; 2003; Furstenberg, Levet, English, Maillet, 2001; Müller-Hartmann, 2000; O’Dowd, 2003; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundCappellini, M. A. (2016) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2016.1134859 · Cited by 30
Moorhouse, B. L., Walsh, S., Li, Y., & Wong, L. (2022) · TESOL Quarterly (Print) · doi:10.1002/tesq.3144 · Cited by 26
Chao, C.-C. (2022) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102860 · Cited by 32
Lim, J., & Liu, Y. (2005) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2005.03.006 · Cited by 29
Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2015) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v32i3.27737 · Cited by 29
“2008), semiotic approaches focusing on how language learners make meaning (Hampel, 2014) and online or virtual ethnography (Hine, 2008) offer unique insights into the experience of online linguistic environments and specific ‘cultures-of-use’ (Thorne, 2003).”
Digital Literacies in Teacher Preparation
Hauck, M., & Kurek, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_22 · Cited by 33
Use of Digital Tools by English Language Schoolteachers
Moorhouse, B. L., & Yan, L. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13030226 · Cited by 47
“, the commonly shared norms and forms of activity adopted by members of a group or community when using specific digital tools [27].”
BackgroundTeacher learning: towards a professional academy
Daly, C., Pachler, N., & Lambert, D. (2004) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/1356251032000155867 · Cited by 28
Global Teachers: A Conceptual Model for Building Teachers’ Intercultural Competence Online
McCloskey, E. M. (2012) · Comunicar · doi:10.3916/c38-2012-02-04 · Cited by 28
Negative evaluation in academic discourse. A comparison of English and Italian research articles
Giannoni, D. S. (2005) · Aisberg (University of Bergamo) · doi:10.6092/lef_20_p71 · Cited by 28
Sato, M., Thorne, S. L., Michel, M. C., Alexopoulou, T., & Hellermann, J. (2025) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12976 · Cited by 42
Self-citationIntercultural learning through Chinese-American telecollaboration: results of a song sharing project
Luo, H., & Gao, P. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2026405 · Cited by 40
“…tool for enabling students to develop intercultural competence’ (Schenker, 2012, p. 450) that also holds a wide variety of other pedagogical benefits (e.g. Kern, 2006; Luo & Yang, 2021; Müller-Hartmann, 2006; O’Dowd, 2003; Rienties et al., 2020; Thorne, 2003; Ware, 2005; Ware & Kramsch, 2005).”
BackgroundTechnology and Language Teaching
Stickler, U. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108874403 · Cited by 30
“Leaving choice completely to learners also means that teachers will need to consider the ‘cultures of use’ (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundLeveraging Technology to Integrate Informal Language Learning within Classroom Settings
Hubbard, P. L. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119472384.ch27 · Cited by 28
The role of telecollaboration in English language teacher education: a systematic review
Emir, G., & Ekşi, G. Y. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00290-0 · Cited by 54
“Today, language teacher education aims to endow teachers with the requisite skills for effective engagement in global communication networks and intercultural communicative language practices (Alptekin, 2022; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundChen, C., & Du, X. (2021) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-020-00543-9 · Cited by 26
“…(Jin and Erben 2007; Mou et al. 2013), their language and language teaching 124 C. Chen, X. Du abilities (Liaw and Master 2010; Angelova and Zhao 2016), cultural knowledge and attitudes (Thorne 2003; Ducate and Lomicka 2008; Lee 2009), and intercultural competency (Liaw 2006; Liaw and Master 2010).”
BackgroundUsing Social Networking Sites as a Platform for Second Language Instruction
Prichard, C. (2013) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.113 · Cited by 25
Tracing EFL writers’ digital literacy practices in asynchronous communication: A multiple-case study
Wu, Z. (2020) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100754 · Cited by 25
Linguistic Landscapes in English Language Teaching: A Pedagogical Guidebook
(2021) · LLinELT eBooks · doi:10.18776/tcu/book/45344 · Cited by 25
Digital Language Learning: A Sociocultural Theory Perspective
Lantolf, J. P., & Xi, J. (2023) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3218 · Cited by 25
Lindner, R., & García, M. D. C. M. (2014) · Language Culture and Curriculum · doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.977910 · Cited by 25
“(S.R.4) it poses students and teachers alike – see, for example, Ware (2005), O’Dowd and Ritter (2006), Thorne (2003), Belz (2002, 2003) and Müller-Hartmann (2000).”
BackgroundLanguage Development and Scaffolding in a Sino-American Telecollaborative Project
Jin, L. (2013) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44330 · Cited by 26
“…of language learners' linguistic, pragmatic, and intercultural communicative competence (e.g., Belz, 2003; Belz & Thorne, 2006; Furstenberg et al., 2001; Levy & Kennedy, 2004; Jin & Erben, 2007; O'Dowd, 2003; Schenker, 2012; Spinelli & Dolci, 2007; Thorne, 2003; Ware & Kramsch, 2005).”
BackgroundTelecollaboration for content and language learning: A Genre-based approach
Cunningham, D. J. (2019) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44701 · Cited by 24
“The process of cultural (re)negotiation is not without the potential for conflict, however, and studies have documented reinforcement of cultural stereotypes (Itakura, 2004; O’Dowd, 2003), divergent discourse styles (Kramsch & Thorne, 2002; Thorne, 2003; Ware & Kramsch, 2005), and discrepant socio-institutional contex…”
BackgroundSasaki, A., & Takeuchi, O. (2009) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344009990206 · Cited by 25
“So far, a number of CMC studies have been conducted from sociocultural perspectives (Arnold & Ducate, 2006; Beltz, 2002; Tanaka, 2005; Thorne, 2003; Warschauer, 2005).”
BackgroundInterculturality in Online Learning: Instructor and Student Accommodations
Sadykova, G., & Meskill, C. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v23i1.1418 · Cited by 24
““Internet communication tools are not neutral media” (Thorne, 2003, p. 38).”
BackgroundTechnology-Mediated Language Learning
Chapelle, C. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108333603.025 · Cited by 24
Choi, E., Gaines, R. E., Park, J.-B. H., Williams, K. M., Schallert, D. L., Yu, L.-T., & Lee, J. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.015 · Cited by 26
Wolthuis, F., Hubers, M. D., van Veen, K., & de Vries, S. (2021) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543211051424 · Cited by 32
“Extending research on artifacts and their effects on what routines do and how they operate would be useful, considering their important effects Concept of Organizational Routines on how initiatives develop (Bell & Linn, 2000; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundLyddon, P. A. (2011) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01272.x · Cited by 29
An Activity Theoretical Approach to Social Interaction During Study Abroad
Shively, R. L. (2016) · L2 Journal · doi:10.5070/l28228670 · Cited by 23
“…studies that have employed this framework in the L2 context is modest, but expanding (e.g., Allen, 2010a, 2013; Coughlan & Duff, 1994; Douglass, 2007; Gillette, 1994; Lantolf & Genung, 2002; Li, 2013; McCafferty, Roebuck, & Wayland, 2001; Nelson & Kim, 2001; Parks, 2000; Thorne, 2000, 2003).”
Designing Tasks for Complex Virtual Learning Environments
Kurek, M. (2015) · Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature · doi:10.5565/rev/jtl3.633 · Cited by 25
“Thorne (2003) confirms that online contexts create “compelling, problematic, and surprising conditions for additional language learning” (p. 38).”
BackgroundInfluentialKumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. J. (2016) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.002 · Cited by 25
Sabino, R. (2018) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004364592 · Cited by 23
Designing for disruption: Remodelling a blended course in technology in (language) teacher education
Hoven, D. (2006) · Cited by 22
Contribution à la structuration de corpus d’apprentissage pour un meilleur partage en recherche
Reffay, C., Chanier, T., Noras, M., & Betbeder, M.-L. (2008) · Sciences et Technologies de l Information et de la Communication pour l Éducation et la Formation · doi:10.3406/stice.2008.984 · Cited by 22
An activity theory analysis of social epistemologies within tertiary-level eLearning environments
Westberry, N. (2009) · Research Commons (University of Waikato) · Cited by 22
Intercultural communication in online social networking discourse
Chen, H.-I. (2016) · Language and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/14708477.2016.1211137 · Cited by 21
“‘cultures-of-use’ (Thorne, 2003) perspective that views technology use as culturally and historically bounded rather than as a neutral artifact and that emphasizes the role of individual learner’s cultural use of technologies in shaping the dialogic interactions between the learner, technological tools, and the contex…”
BackgroundInfluentialHadjistassou, S. K. (2016) · International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijwltt.2016040102 · Cited by 13
Using Skype to Focus on Form in Japanese Telecollaboration
Akiyama, Y. (2014) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6174-5.ch009 · Cited by 21
“Although often used interchangeably, the term telecollaboration refers to international class-to-class partnership within institutionalized settings (Thorne, 2003), while eTandem refers to individual language learning in dyads, spending half the time in learner’s first language (L1) and the other…”
BackgroundAn exchange structure analysis of the development of online intercultural activity
Kitade, K. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.584512 · Cited by 25
“…of Internet-mediated second-language education embrace both pedagogy (e.g. Bauer, de Benedette, Furstenberg, Levet, & Waryn, 2006; Thorne, 2003) and actual learning in institutional (e.g. Liaw & Bunn-Le Master, 2010; O’Dowd, 2003, 2006) and noninstitutional intercultural contexts…”
Digital mediation in ESP genres
Hafner, C. A., Harrison, S., Ho, W. Y. J., & Kwan, B. S. C. (2023) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2023.03.002 · Cited by 21
Mediated life activity, double stimulation, and the question of agency
Thorne, S. (2015) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.10.002 · Cited by 16
“e cite this article as: Thorne, S.L., Mediated life activity, double stimulation, and the question of agency, Learning, Culture and l Interaction (2014), http://dx.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thorne, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Portland State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thorne, Steven L.
- ORCID
- Thorne, Steven L.
- Venue
- Language Learning & Technology
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 38-67
- ISSN
- 1094-3501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109217363
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 80.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Language learning & technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
- ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (submittedVersion)
- Language learning & technology (cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Education
- University of Pennsylvania
- Pennsylvania State University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- intercultural communication, cultural artifacts, computer-mediated communication, foreign language learning, hyperpersonal communication, email, interpersonal dynamics, language development, digital communication tools, cross-cultural collaboration, pragmatic development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review