The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication
Open accessAbstract
This article develops a conceptual framework for understanding how intercultural communication, mediated by cultural artifacts (i.e., Internet communication tools), creates compelling, problematic, and surprising conditions for additional language learning.Three case studies of computer-mediated intercultural engagement draw together correlations between discursive orientation, communicative modality, communicative activity, and emergent interpersonal dynamics.These factors contribute to varying qualities and quantities of participation in the intercultural partnerships.Case one, "Clashing Frames of Expectation --Differing Cultures-of-Use," suggests that the cultures-of-use of Internet communication tools, their perceived existence and on-going construction as distinctive cultural artifacts, differs interculturally just as communicative genre, pragmatics, and institutional context would be expected to differ interculturally.Case two, "Intercultural Communication as Hyperpersonal Engagement," illustrates pragmatic and linguistic development as an outcome of intercultural relationship building.The final case study, "The Wrong Tool for the Right Job?," describes a recent generational shift in communication tool preference wherein an ostensibly ubiquitous tool, e-mail, is shown to be unsuitable for mediating age peer relationships.Taken together, these case studies demonstrate that Internet communication tools are not neutral media.Rather, individual and collective experience is shown to influence the ways students engage in Internet-mediated communication with consequential outcomes for both the processes and products of language development.For some social classes and in highly privileged geographical regions, we have entered into a period of rapid and efficient global communication practices mediating an array of interpersonal, discursivematerial, and cultural activities.Despite the robust connections between the increasing digitization of everyday communicative practice and issues such as globalization and homogenization, Internet-mediated intercultural educational activities remain demonstrably polymorphous.Reasons for this are many.Educational cultures and objectives vary across nation state boundaries (Belz, 2002) as well as across educational institutions within the US.Moreover, within the same university but across courses or time periods, student populations shift, pedagogical goals are reassessed, and micro-interactional phenomena illustrate their own "accentuality" (Volosinov, 1973), even when the task, as it were, is supposed to remain consistent across participants and time (Coughlan & Duff, 1994).The focus of this article is yet another dimension of human heterogeneity --the cultural embeddedness of Internet communication tools and the consequences of this embedding for communicative activity.Three case studies will be presented which illustrate some of the possibilities and problems associated with foreign language intercultural interaction mediated by Internet communication tools.I argue that Internet communication tools, like all human artifacts, are cultural tools (for an extension of this argument to the natural environment and the social construction of nature, see Braun & Castree, 1998;Harvey, 1996;Williams, 1980).Specifically, I show that e-mail, instant messenger, and forms of synchronous chat, are deeply affected by the cultures-of-use, or to borrow a biological term --phenotypic characteristics, evolving from the manner in which these tools mediate everyday communicative practice.To unpack this somewhat, most of the American students in the case studies have extensive Internet experience that catalyzes specific forms (and expectations) of communication.In turn, the resulting Steven L. Thorne Artifacts and Cultures-of-Use in Intercultural CommunicationLanguage Learning & Technology 39 communicative dynamics are consequential for both the processes and products of language learning.Importantly, these case studies span a 5-year period and in so doing demonstrate that the cultures-of-use of Internet communication tools are rapidly evolving, if in geographically non-uniform directions, and play a critical role in the manner in which intercultural communication plays out in formal educational contexts.Of particular relevance to foreign language uses of "telecollaboration" (implying interaction mediated by Internet communication tools), I will include a critical discussion of recent Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) research (Walther, 1994(Walther, , 1996(Walther, , 1997) ) and will build on a theoretical framework that can broadly be termed a cultural-historical perspective of human communication and cognition (e.g., Bruner, 1995;Cole, 1996;Hanks, 1996;Levinson, 1995;Rommetveit, 1974;van der Veer & Valsiner, 1991).This approach emphasizes the process whereby individuals modify, transform, and comprehend artifacts and environments (e.g., Bødker, 1997;Cole & Engestrom, 1993;Kapetlinin, 199
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A number of recent studies found that the contradictions may also take place because of the misalignment of academic calendars, institutionalized classroom scripts, methods of learning accreditation, academic socialization and technological access (Belz, 2002;Belz & Muller-Hartmann, 2003;O'Dowd, 2005;Thorne, 2003).”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Thorne (2003), for example, in his study demonstrates how the learners' relationship with physical contexts and computers may facilitate contradictions.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Internet communication tools are often”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Thorne (2003) and Wertsch, Minick, and Arns (1984) showed how the same task is implemented differently by means of available tools across different socio-cultural contexts.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The most recent studies on telecollaboration (Belz, 2001(Belz, , 2002(Belz, , 2003;;Belz & Muller-Hartmann, 2003;Belz & Thorne, 2006;Chase, Macfadyen, Reeder & Roche, 2002;Kramsch & Thorne, 2002;O'Dowd, 2003O'Dowd, , 2005;;Schneider & von der Emde, 2006;Thorne, 2003Thorne, , 2006;;Ware, 2005) explore the kinds of cultural contact afforded by a technological medium.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Thorne concludes that radically different cultures-of-use of Internet communication was one of the major reasons for the tension between the French and American students.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These studies emphasize the importance of physical contexts consisting of mediating tools and other people in shaping an online interaction.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These contradictions were catalyzed by the clash of curricula versus interactive learning paradigms (Lemke, 1998): the outcomes of different cultures-of-use of computer technologies (Thorne, 2003), instructors' mediation, and resources available to learners within their broader sociocultural contexts.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Thorne (2003) argues that for successful intercultural and international telecollaboration to take place and in order for Internet-mediated interpersonal or hyperpersonal relationships to develop, there should be certain minimum alignment of cultures-of-use.”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Thorne (2003)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“AT can help illuminate challenges related to cultures of use of tools (see Thorne, 2003) occurring when students 'approach [a] new task with old habits' (Blin, 2004, p. 167).”
From Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology (2008) · cites this paper as Thorne, 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M. E. F., Lave, J., & Wenger, É. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,362
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Bhabha, H. Κ. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203820551 · Cited by 19,148
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,591
Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0597 · Cited by 12,654
Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage
Brown, P. (1987) · Cited by 11,901
5. The Practice of Everyday Life
Liu, X. (2000) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520923478-008 · Cited by 10,752
Butler, J. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203828274 · Cited by 10,468 · cited 1×
“…that the process of becoming a competent member of one digitally mediated speech community may have demonstrable effects on presentation of self and the aesthetics of communicative performativity (e.g., Butler, 1993; Cameron, 2000) in another, quite dissimilar digitally mediated interaction.”
Corsaro, W. A., & Bourdieu, P. (1992) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579985 · Cited by 9,968 · cited 1×
“Communicative activity articulates with and is a form of material culture (Bourdieu, 1991; Gee, 1990; Lemke, 1995; The New London Group, 1996).”
Background(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4888 · Cited by 9,298
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: A morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Bruner, J. (1995). Meaning and self in a cultural perspective. In D. Bakhurst & C. Sypnowich (Eds.), The social self (pp. 18-29). London: Sage Publications.
- In S. Chaiklin (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 15-34). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
- Cole, M., Hood, L., & McDermott, R. (1997). Concepts of ecological validity: Their differing implications for comparative cognitive research. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and actvivity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (pp. 49-58). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Lantolf, J. (in press). Sociocultural theory and SLA: An exegesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (in press). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Lexington, MA: D.C.Heath. Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 97-114). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Thorne, S. (1999). An activity theoretical analysis of electronic foreign language discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
- Thorne, S. (2000b). Second language acquisition and the truth(s) about relativity. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 219-244). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
- In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 245-259). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- van Lier, L. (in press). The ecology of language learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wilkinson, S. (1996). Foreign language conversation and the study abroad transition: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Pennsylvania State University.
- Wylie, L., & Brière, J. F. (1995). Les Français (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration
Belz, J. A. (2003) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25201 · Cited by 545
“…72, for the case of Jackie; Belz & Müller-Hartmann, 2003, pp. 75-84, for telecollaborative teachers; Furstenberg et al. 2001, p. 57; Kinginger, in press, for the case of Anita; Müller-Hartmann, 1999, p. 75, for the case of culture-specific irony; Thorne, 2003, this issue, for the case of Kirsten.)”
BackgroundSecond Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming
THORNE, S. L., BLACK, R. W., & SYKES, J. M. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x · Cited by 516
“Drawing from cultural historical activity theory (e.g., Engeström, 1987; Kaptelinin & Nardi, 2006; Nardi, 1996), Thorne (2003, 2005, 2009) applied a variation of this argument to processes of Internet tool socialization and have described research illustrating that technologies mediate…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPerspectives on Technology in Learning and Teaching Languages
Kern, R. (2006) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/40264516 · Cited by 488
“…to foster cross-cultural communication also need to consider how the different groups involved relate to the electronic medium as a cultural tool of communication, to better understand how social constraints and opportunities affect intercultural communication (Lam, 2003; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialCognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives: Two Parallel SLA Worlds?
Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. R. (2006) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/40264510 · Cited by 445
“, Canagarajah, 2000; Jenkins, 2003, also this issue; Kachru, 2001; Pennycook, 1998; Rampton, 1995); and explorations in the new kinds of discursive practices that language learners engage when using new technologies (see especially Gee, 2003; Kern, this issue; Lam, 2000; Thorne, 2003; and Warschauer, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialToward an Intercultural Stance: Teaching German and English through Telecollaboration
Ware, P., & Kramsch, C. (2005) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00274.x · Cited by 384
“As previously observed (Kramsch, A’Ness, & Lam, 2000; Kramsch & Thorne, 2002; Thorne, 2003), the electronic medium tends to blur genres that are usually kept separate in face-to-face interaction.”
BackgroundEvolutionary Trajectories, Internet-mediated Expression, and Language Education
Thorne, S. L., & Payne, J. (2005) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.371-397 · Cited by 360
“…offline contexts, has received significant attention in recent years (e.g., Belz, 2002, 2004; Belz & Thorne, in press; Byram, 1997; Furstenberg, Levet, English, & Maillet, 2001; Kinginger, 1998, 2004; Kramsch & Thorne, 2002; Müller-Hartmann, 2000; O’Dowd, 2003; Tudini, 2003; Thorne, 2003a, in press).”
InfluentialSelf-citationUnderstanding and Working with ‘Failed Communication’ in Telecollaborative Exchanges
O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v23i3.623-642 · Cited by 359
“Bridging Activities,” New Media Literacies, and Advanced Foreign Language Proficiency
Thorne, S. L., & Reinhardt, J. S. (2008) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v25i3.558-572 · Cited by 345
“(This is a veiled reference to the zone of proximal development, e.g., Vygotsky, 1978; within applied linguistics, see Lantolf & Thorne, 2006; Thorne, 2003.)”
BackgroundSelf-citationCollaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44276 · Cited by 342
“This figure illustrates the unfamiliar and evolving nature of Web-based word processing and students' use of this space and shows how the tools communicators use and the way they use them often co-evolve (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWeb 2.0, Synthetic Immersive Environments, and Mobile Resources for Language Education
Sykes, J. M., Oskoz, A., & Thorne, S. L. (2008) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v25i3.528-546 · Cited by 318
Self-citationCulture in foreign language teaching
Kramsch, C. (2013) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 311
Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2010) · Peter Lang CH eBooks · doi:10.3726/978-3-0351-0013-6 · Cited by 298
Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration
Ware, P., & O’Dowd, R. (2008) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44130 · Cited by 286
“A focus on the social aspects of language use stems from the potential of telecollaboration to provide opportunities for students to see language and culture as two sides of the same coin (Belz, 2003; Furstenberg et al., 2001; Kern, 1996; Thorne, 2003, 2006; Ware & Kramsch, 2005).”
Background11. CROSSING FRONTIERS: NEW DIRECTIONS IN ONLINE PEDAGOGY AND RESEARCH
Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190504000091 · Cited by 278
“discussion, and synchronous chat for communication and collaboration with a partner class abroad, while the second class serves as a control group, using the same electronic media for intraclass communication only (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialLearner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world
Peterson, M. (2006) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220600804087 · Cited by 267
“Recent studies have explored the role of social and cultural influences on learner interaction in CMC (Thorne, 2003; Ware, 2005; Warner, 2004) and have stressed the importance of these factors on language development.”
BackgroundReinhardt, J. S. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000356 · Cited by 341
“In response to Prensky’s (2001) ‘digital natives’ hypothesis, Thorne (2003) offered a sociocultural theoretic interpretation of online behavior as reflective of contextually contingent ‘cultures of use’.”
BackgroundWikis: a collective approach to language production
Lund, A. (2008) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344008000414 · Cited by 246
“Mediating technologies and cultures-of-use reciprocally influence each other (Thorne, 2003), and communicative activity articulates as well as changes cultures (for the relationship between cognition and the communicative tools we use, see e.”
BackgroundE-learning and the development of intercultural competence
Liaw, M. (2006) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44074 · Cited by 241
Current Trends in Online Language Learning
Blake, R. J. (2011) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s026719051100002x · Cited by 241
“…(a) social virtualities, such as Second Life or Active Worlds (Peterson, 2006, 2010); (b) commercial MMOs, such as World of Warcraft (Soares, 2010; Thorne, 2003); and (c) made-for-education synthetic immersive environments, such as Croquelandia (Sykes, 2011; Sykes, Oskoz, & Thorne, 2008).”
BackgroundBelz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2003) · Language Learning · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00238.x · Cited by 234
“She reasons that both of these computer-mediated affordances, that is, ‘‘that which is offered by the linguistic environment and perceived by the learner’’ (van Lier, 1996, p. 12), may contribute to the development of awareness and appropriate use of L2 address forms (see also Belz & Kinginger, 2002; Thorne, 2003, pp.…”
BackgroundMethodLearning Language, Learning Culture: Teaching Language to the Whole Student
Kim, D. (2020) · ECNU Review of Education · doi:10.1177/2096531120936693 · Cited by 283
“Globalization and new technologies have opened dramatic new opportunities for language teaching and learning (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundBlogging: Promoting Learner Autonomy and Intercultural Competence through Study Abroad
Lee, L. (2011) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44264 · Cited by 223
“The comments confirms those reported in previous studies of CMC indicating that the accessibility of the Internet becomes essential for network-based learning and further affects students’ motivation (Thorne, 2003; Ware, 2005).”
ResultThe practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe
Helm, F. (2015) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44424 · Cited by 236
“Also on the interactional level is the cultures-of-use of particular tools which can lead to divergent communicative expectations and cause a breakdown in communication (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundLANGUAGE AND LITERACY DEVELOPMENT IN COMPUTER-MEDIATED CONTEXTS AND COMMUNITIES
Thorne, S. L., & Black, R. W. (2007) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190508070074 · Cited by 226
“Basharina drew upon the cultures-of-use framework (Thorne, 2003), in particular the proposition that historically sedimented qualities accrue to Internet”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMurphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1203 · Cited by 213
“AT can help illuminate challenges related to cultures of use of tools (see Thorne, 2003) occurring when students “approach [a] new task with old habits” (Blin, 2004, p. 167).”
BackgroundImmersive technologies and language learning
Blyth, C. S. (2018) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12327 · Cited by 212
Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development
Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. I. (2016) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44447 · Cited by 203
“In this case, the technological tools helped mediate communication (Thorne, 2003) in a way that paper-based writing or standard word processing software could not have done.”
BackgroundIntercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: a systematic review
Avgousti, M. I. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1455713 · Cited by 203
“Hauck (2010) further argues that MCC, the ‘cultures-of-use’ of the tools used (Thorne, 2003), and gains in intercultural competence (Byram, 1997) are the least interrelated, if not interdependent.”
BackgroundA study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies
Lee, L., & Markey, A. (2014) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344014000111 · Cited by 197
“To conclude, the development of learners ’ intercultural competence should be the core of L2 instruction in the age of globalization (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundDeveloping Intercultural Communicative Competence through Online Exchanges
Chun, D. M. (2011) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.2.392-419 · Cited by 186
“Based on three case studies, Thorne (2003) concludes that the tools are not neutral media.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialForm-focused Interaction in Online Tandem Learning
O’Rourke, B. (2005) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.433-466 · Cited by 190
“In ecological terms, the properties of the technology stand in a dialogic relation to the activities of users, giving rise to dynamic affordances (Thorne, 2003; Van Lier, 2000).”
BackgroundThe Relationship Between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer‐Assisted Language Learning
CHAPELLE, C. A. (2009) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.x · Cited by 301
“It follows that pedagogy should be designed in a way that keeps the communication flowing without fatal breakdowns caused by conflicting activity systems among participants (Russell, 2001; Thorne, 2003).”
Background(2006) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410613578 · Cited by 174
Cultural diversity online: student engagement with learning technologies
Hannon, J., & D'Netto, B. (2007) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/09513540710760192 · Cited by 166
“Thorne suggests that the use (“cultures-of-use”) of online communication tools “differs interculturally just as communicative genre, pragmatics, and institutional context would be expected to differ interculturally” ( Thorne, 2003”
BackgroundTechnologies, Identities, and Expressive Activity
Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & SMITH, B. K. (2015) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190514000257 · Cited by 184
“As is clear in a number of the studies discussed below, this is especially the case with the use of vernacular, or noneducationally designed, media and social-networking sites (SNSs) that students may have long histories with outside of academic settings (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundSelf-citationIntercultural Competence and Cultural Learning Through Telecollaboration
Schenker, T. (2012) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.29.3.449-470 · Cited by 159
“Researchers have pointed out the beneficial use of telecollaborative and other computermediated projects for acquiring greater language skills as well as intercultural competence (Belz & Müller-Hartmann, 2002; Belz & Thorne, 2006; Blake, 2008; Furstenberg, Levet, English, & Maillet, 2001; Gonglewski, Meloni, & Brant,…”
BackgroundTechnology as Pharmakon: The Promise and Perils of the Internet for Foreign Language Education
Kern, R. (2014) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12065.x · Cited by 229
“…the viability of telecollaboration for providing motivating language practice and developing intercultural awareness, some studies show that intercultural contact does not necessarily lead to cultural understanding (Belz, 2002, 2003; Coleman, 1998; O’Dowd, 2003, 2006; Thorne, 2003; Ware, 2005).”
BackgroundTECHNOLOGY AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
Chapelle, C. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190508070050 · Cited by 171
“CALL research and development that explicitly draw on SLA as a basis for design and evaluation even though CALL can be studied from a variety of perspectives (Egbert & Petrie, 2005; Levy & Stockwell, 2006; Thorne, 2003; Warschauer, 1998).”
BackgroundAn activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration
Basharina, O. K. (2007) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44105 · Cited by 139
“Thorne (2003) and Wertsch, Minick, and Arns (1984) showed how the same task is implemented differently by means of available tools across different socio-cultural contexts.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialElectronic feedback and second language writing
Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524742.008 · Cited by 139
Epistemology, Politics, and Ethics in Sociocultural Theory
Thorne, S. L. (2005) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00313.x · Cited by 148
“In a previous study (Thorne, 2003),22 I focused on Kirsten, a university student in a fourth-semester French grammar course who participated in an Internet-mediated intercultural communication exchange with a university in France.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSauro, S. J. (2011) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.2.369-391 · Cited by 136
“This includes learners’ varying ability to use the appropriate second person pronoun in German (Belz & Kinginger, 2002), French (Lamy, 2004; Thorne, 2003), and Italian (Tudini, 2007).”
BackgroundÇiftçi, E. Y., & Savaş, P. (2017) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344017000313 · Cited by 132
“…to help students navigate effectively through complex recent global developments, language education systems strive to equip them with the necessary skills to engage effectively in global communication networks and (intercultural) communicative language practices (Alptekin, 2002; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundYang, J., & Kim, T.-Y. (2011) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.07.005 · Cited by 130
Social Networking in an Intensive English Program Classroom
Reinhardt, J. S., & Zander, V. (2011) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.2.326-344 · Cited by 137
“As a literacy practice, SNS use is built around existing and emerging communities of practice; in their online equivalents, unique cultures of use (Thorne, 2003) have developed around the use of particular sets of tools by communities of users.”
MethodHow do we Know what Students are Actually Doing? Monitoring Students' Behavior in CALL†
Fischer, R. A. (2007) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220701746013 · Cited by 140
“19 Belz and Kinginger (2003) and Thorne (2003) found that noticing resulted in the acquisition of pragmatic distinctions between formal and informal forms of address, and Fiori (2005) found that students who received implicit corrective feedback in chat sessions performed with greater grammatical…”
BackgroundThe ‘Intercultural Turn’ and Language Learning in the Crucible of New Media.
Thorne, S. L., Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2010) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 127
Self-citationMitchell, K. (2012) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.29.3.471-493 · Cited by 130
“When using Facebook, each of the participants was unknowingly using different cultural artifacts, as Facebook is embedded in different individual cultures-ofuse (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundMethodDid We Forget Someone? Students’ Computer Access and Literacy for CALL
Winke, P. M., & Goertler, S. (2008) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v25i3.482-509 · Cited by 123
“…communication with positive developmental results, including in the areas of vocabulary, morphology, and oral and pragmatic skills (Belz, 2001; Belz & Kinginger, 2002; Blake, 2005, 2008; Hampel, 2006; Kern, 2006; Payne & Ross, 2005; Salaberry, 2000a, 2000b, 2001; Thorne, 2003; Warschauer, 2004).”
Lee, L. (2007) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02885.x · Cited by 118
Negotiation and Intercultural Learning in Italian Native Speaker Chat Rooms
Tudini, V. (2007) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00624.x · Cited by 115
Cultures-of-use and morphologies of communicative action
Thorne, S. L. (2016) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44473 · Cited by 109
“As initially outlined in “Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication” (Thorne, 2003), these practices emerge within distinctive cultures-of-use— that is, in the articulation between the immediate contextual aspects of the communicative event at hand and the historically sedimented associations, purpo…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationTwenty years of telecollaborative practice: implications for teaching Chinese as a foreign language
Luo, H., & Yang, C. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1420083 · Cited by 112
“The intercultural model re fl ects the trend of attaching importance to intercultural and sociocultural aspects of foreign language teaching in the late 1990s and early 2000s (Thorne, 2003, 2010).”
BackgroundThe Use of Technology for Second Language Distance Learning
Blake, R. J. (2009) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00975.x · Cited by 108
“Other CMC benefits, whether from SCMC or ACMC, of a more controversial nature include claims that these modalities level hierarchical differences originating from ethnicity, age, gender, and shyness (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundLiterate Arts in a Global World: Reframing Social Networking as Cosmopolitan Practice
Hull, G., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2010) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.54.2.1 · Cited by 107
“Although a focus on multiculturalism (e.g., Banks, 2004) and intercultural competence (cf. Thorne, 2003; Ware & Kramsch, 2005) has helped attune educators to issues of difference and diversity, these approaches primarily have addressed intra national differences between cultures within the…”
BackgroundTHE ROLE OF COMPUTER MEDIATION IN THE INSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF L2 PRAGMATIC COMPETENCE
Belz, J. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190508070037 · Cited by 111
“Although a number of studies have appeared that do take a longitudinal approach (e.g., Bardovi-Harlig & Hartford, 2005; Barron, 2003; Hoffman-Hicks, 2000; Ohta, 2001; Schauer, 2006; Schmidt, 1983), they do not rely heavily on either CM or CMC.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSynchronous CMC and Pragmatic Development
Sykes, J. (2005) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v22i3.399-431 · Cited by 198
Aspects of advanced foreign language proficiency: Internet‐mediated German language play
Belz, J. A., & Reinhardt, J. S. (2004) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2004.00069.x · Cited by 105
“Thus, these students readily co-opted this home activity into their institutionalized learning of German in order to correspond outside of class time with their new German keypals (see Thorne 2003: 54–6 for the similar case of Oliver and Kirsten).”
BackgroundJáuregi, K., & Bañados, E. (2008) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344008000529 · Cited by 107
“In this sense, Thorne (2003: 48) has reported that students preferred a chat tool over e-mail for “authentic interpersonal relationship building”.”
BackgroundTaking language learning outside the classroom: learners' perspectives of eTandem learning viaSkype
Tian, J., & Wang, Y. (2010) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2010.513443 · Cited by 100
“Thorne ( 2003 ) terms this kind of partnership Internet mediated intercultural foreign language education (ICFLE) and Thorne (2006) categorizes it into four models: telecollaboration; eTandem; partnerships between local expert speakers and foreign language students; and learners' participation in online communities.”
BackgroundInfluentialParetti, M., McNair, L., & Holloway-Attaway, L. (2007) · Technical Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10572250701291087 · Cited by 101
“Such was the case, for instance, in Thorne's (2003) study of cross-cultural partnerships for language learning.”
BackgroundDeveloping multiliteracies in ELT through telecollaboration
Guth, S., & Helm, F. (2011) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccr027 · Cited by 99
Lantz-Andersson, A., Vigmo, S., & Bowen, R. (2013) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9177-0 · Cited by 100
“The collaborative and communicative practices within SNSs are therefore tightly connected with the medium and the context, but they are not seen as determined by the medium itself (Thorne 2003).”
BackgroundLanguage and culture learning in higher education via telecollaboration
Chun, D. M. (2015) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2014.999775 · Cited by 97
“Many studies have been influenced by sociocultural theory (Belz, 2002; Thorne, 2003; Ware, 2005).”
BackgroundConversation Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication
González‐Lloret, M. (2011) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.2.308-325 · Cited by 96
Understanding telecollaboration through an analysis of intercultural discourse
Liaw, M., & Master, S. B.-L. (2010) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220903467301 · Cited by 102
“The forums in this online intercultural learning environment therefore served as a timely ‘third space’ for the two groups of students across the Pacific Ocean (Kramsch, 1993; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundResult‘Community’, semiotic flows, and mediated contribution to activity
Thorne, S. L. (2008) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444808005429 · Cited by 98
“USE – that is, in interaction with immediate contextual conditions, ‘the historically sedimented characteristics that accrue to a [computer-mediated-communication] tool from its everyday use’ (Thorne 2003: 40; see also Thorne & Black 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLee, L. (2012) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01164.x · Cited by 92
“The comments confi rm those reported in previous studies of CMC indicating that the accessibility of networking becomes essential for network-based learning and further affects students’ motivation (Thorne, 2003; Ware, 2005).”
BackgroundThe Role of Pedagogical Mentoring in Virtual Exchange
O'Dowd, R., Sauro, S., & Spector‐Cohen, E. (2020) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.543 · Cited by 121
Intercultural Questioning, Discovery and Tension in Internet-mediated Language Learning Partnerships
Belz, J. A. (2005) · Language and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/14708470508668881 · Cited by 91
“…on the work of Walther (1992, 1996), Herring (1996) and other communication theorists (e.g. Hancock & Dunham, 2001; Sullivan et al ., 2004) in their investigations of the development of IC or awareness among ‘zero history’ keypals in telecollaborative exchanges (see, however, Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundNEW TRENDS IN USING TECHNOLOGY IN THE LANGUAGE CURRICULUM
Blake, R. (2007) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190508070049 · Cited by 91
“…researchers (Belz 2002, 2003; Belz & Thorne, 2006; Byram, 1997; Darhower, 2007; Kern et al., 2004; Lomicka, 2006; O’Dowd, 2003, 2005, 2006; Thorne, 2003; Ware & Kramsch, 2005; Warschauer, 2004; Wildner-Bassett, 2005) disfavors the purely interactionist SCMC paradigm because it portrays…”
Rewilding Language Education: Emergent Assemblages and Entangled Actions
Thorne, S. L., Hellermann, J., & Jakonen, T. (2021) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12687 · Cited by 125
Self-citationToward an Ecological CALL: Update to Garrett (1991)
Lafford, B. A. (2009) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00966.x · Cited by 93
Negotiating Cultures in Cyberspace: Participation Patterns and Problematics
Reeder, K., Macfadyen, L. P., Roche, J., & Chase, M. (2008) · doi:10.14288/1.0058429 · Cited by 87
“Ess (1998) recognizes that theories of culture elaborated by Hofstede, Hall, Geertz (1973; see especially, Abdelnour-Nocera, 1998, 2002 ), and Carey (1989) are used frequently by intercultural educators, but asks,”
BackgroundInfluentialDigital stories: Bringing multimodal texts to the Spanish writing classroom
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2016) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344016000094 · Cited by 88
“Given that the selection and use of tools are not neutral actions, they can shape the mediation process between the actor and the object that is acted upon (Kuutti, 1996; Wertsch, 1991) and can have an impact on language development (Hampel & Hauck, 2006; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundHampel, R. (2009) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501220802655425 · Cited by 86
“These include adapting authentic material, devising meaningful purposes for interaction and choosing the right tool for the job, a tool that fits in with the task and the learners’ cultures-of-use (Thorne 2003).”
MethodA mixed-method study of EFL teachers’ Internet use in language instruction
Chen, Y.-L. (2007) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.07.002 · Cited by 87
“With the creation of the World Wide Web, it has become possible and feasible for language teachers to make effective use of instructional materials, especially in teaching language and culture (e.g., Belz, 2003; Johnson & Brine, 1999; Kramsch, A’Ness, & Lam, 2000; O’Dowd, 2003; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundOnline Second Language Acquisition : Conversation Analysis of Online Chat
Tudini, V. A. (2010) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781474212304 · Cited by 84
Mediating Technologies and Second Language Learning
Thorne, S. L. (2008) · doi:10.4324/9781410618894.ch15 · Cited by 84
“…deal, perhaps even the majority, of research in this area suggests that cultural miscommunication and open conflict should Q8 ER56528_C015.indd 428 6/6/07 11:19:09 AM be expected (e.g., Kramsch & Thorne, 2002; Schneider & von der Emde, 2003, 2006; Thorne, 2003; Ware, 2005; Ware & Kramsch, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationA scientometric review of research trends in computer-assisted language learning (1977 – 2020)
Lim, M. H., & Aryadoust, V. (2021) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1892768 · Cited by 88
“Kötter (2003), O’Dowd (2003), Thorne (2003), Aitsiselmi (1999) and Appel (1999) supported the use of telecollaboration or e-mail exchange in the development of linguistic and metalinguistic abilities, intercultural communicative competence and French grammar.”
BackgroundA Linguistics of Communicative Activity
Thorne, S. L., & Lantolf, J. P. (2006) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.27939678.11 · Cited by 83
Self-citationEFL learner collaborative interaction in second life
Peterson, M. (2012) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344011000279 · Cited by 158
“The literature on learner text-based interaction in real time CMC suggests that a degree of caution should be exercised when seeking to generalize the findings of research conducted in this area, as the findings of individual studies may vary depending on the interplay of the variables outlined above (Hudson & Bruckma…”
BackgroundThe Role of Linguistic Affordances in Telecollaborative Chat
Darhower, M. A. (2009) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v26i1.48-69 · Cited by 78
“…and intercultural bring about a richness in telecollaborative communication which Thorne classifies as “compelling, problematic and surprising” (Thorne, 2003, p. 38) In telecollaborative chat rooms, there is a great potential for activation of language awareness via linguistic affordances.”
BackgroundInfluentialAntoniadou, V. (2011) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344011000164 · Cited by 84
“…and generally the subjects’ resistance to using the tool represented another important contradiction between the participant groups’ uneven ‘‘cultures-of-use’’ (Thorne, 2003) in relation to SL. Thorne terms as cultures-of-use the historically constructed forms of activity correlated with the use…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialContributing, creating, curating: Digital literacies for language learners
Godwin‐Jones, R. (2015) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44427 · Cited by 77
“The reality that the choice of media or tool is not neutral has been widely discussed in the context of telecollaborative tools (Thorne, 2003) and is all the more relevant for mashups and augmented reality, which explicitly seek to modify existing materials.”
Computer Assisted Language Learning
Chapelle, C. A. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470694138.ch41 · Cited by 73
Oral Interaction Around Computers in the Project-Oriented CALL Classroom
Jeon-Ellis, G., Debski, R., & Wigglesworth, G. (2005) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44035 · Cited by 67
“A number of recent studies have attempted to describe L2 learning in computer-mediated environments from a broader perspective by incorporating a sociocultural approach (e.g., Belz, 2002; Goodfellow & Lamy, 1999; Lee, 2004; Thorne, 2003; Warschauer, 2000).”
BackgroundIntercultural Learning via Instant Messenger Interaction
Jin, L., & Erben, T. (2007) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v24i2.291-312 · Cited by 69
“In recent years, many research projects have been launched to investigate the application of networking technologies to language acquisition and intercultural learning through building telecollaboration between foreign language learners and native speakers (NSs) of the target culture (e.g., Belz, 2002; Belz & Müller-H…”
BackgroundPromoting dialogue or hegemonic practice? Power issues in telecollaboration
Helm, F., Guth, S., & Farrah, M. (2012) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44289 · Cited by 69
“As Thorne (2003) explains: [c]ultural artifacts such as global communication technologies are produced by and productive of socio-historically located subjects.”
BackgroundTECHNOLOGIES FOR SECOND LANGUAGE LITERACY
Murray, D. E. (2005) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190505000103 · Cited by 69
“Recent research (Thorne, 2003b) on American students learning French and being required to use e-mail with a French keypal found that for some learners, e-mail was not a mode of choice for developing interpersonal relations with age-peers, which had been the purpose for the teacher assigning the…”
BackgroundBrown, L. (2014) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amu075 · Cited by 68
Technology-mediated task-based language teaching: A research agenda
SMITH, B. K., & González‐Lloret, M. (2020) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444820000233 · Cited by 92
“This notion of ‘ fit ’ is also consistent with Thorne ’ s (2003) ‘ cultures of use, ’ which refers to the way learners currently select and employ digital devices and apps for personal and social purposes.”
ResultYoung children’s Internet use at home and school: Patterns and profiles
Johnson, G. M. (2010) · Journal of Early Childhood Research · doi:10.1177/1476718x10379783 · Cited by 72
“From a socio-cultural perspective, human tools (e.g. email) mediate and define social processes (e.g. communication; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundCyberDeutsch: Language Production and User Preferences in a Moodle Virtual Learning Environment
Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2010) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.1.49-73 · Cited by 65
“Therefore, a combination of data collection methods (Thorne, 2003) seems most promising for providing a fuller picture of language learning in an online environment (Hubbard, 2005).”
BackgroundLenkaitis, C. A., Calo, S. M., & Escobar, S. V. (2019) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2019.1570772 · Cited by 63
“Not only does telecollaboration allow students to learn from native speakers and receive feedback, which allows students to grow in pragmatic awareness (Thorne, 2003), but also L2 learners learn about cultures other than their own and make connections with their coursework and between their own culture and that of the…”
BackgroundA dynamic approach to social interaction: Synthetic immersive environments & Spanish pragmatics
Sykes, J. M. (2008) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 63
Student Agency and Language-Learning Processes and Outcomes in International Online Environments
Basharina, O. (2009) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v26i2.390-412 · Cited by 62
“In this study differences in genres of writing were catalyzed by the differences in cultures-of-use of computer technologies (Thorne, 2003; Basharina, 2005) in Canada, Mexico, and Russia.”
MethodBelcher, D. (2014) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.06.003 · Cited by 62
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Language Teaching
Moorhouse, B. L., & Wong, K. M. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009618823 · Cited by 84
O’Rourke, B. (2008) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220802090253 · Cited by 59
“Thus, for example, Thorne (2003) found that for undergraduate students in Penn State University, instant messenger (IM) systems afford the building of age-peer relationships in a manner that e-mail cannot (the ecological perspective); but this, he argues, is due in the first place not to inherent…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Thorne, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Portland State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thorne, Steven L.
- ORCID
- Thorne, Steven L.
- Venue
- Language Learning & Technology
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 38-67
- ISSN
- 1094-3501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109217363
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 80.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Language learning & technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
- ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (submittedVersion)
- Language learning & technology (cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Education
- University of Pennsylvania
- Pennsylvania State University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- intercultural communication, cultural artifacts, computer-mediated communication, foreign language learning, hyperpersonal communication, email, interpersonal dynamics, language development, digital communication tools, cross-cultural collaboration, pragmatic development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review