Cited by 51Animal testing and alternativesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Refinement of welfare through development of a quantitative system for assessment of lifetime experience

Wolfensohn, S, Sharpe, S, Hall, I, Lawrence, S, Kitchen, S, Dennis, M·2015·Animal Welfare

Abstract

Abstract This paper proposes a system that uses intrinsic study data to provide a clear visualisation of the stresses involved during the animal's life history that can be applied to all types of studies, even those not requiring invasive techniques. Thus, it provides an opportunity for researchers to identify and refine key events which impact on the welfare of an animal, and to explain clearly the totality of any necessary harms when justifying the research. Assessment of animal welfare depends on measurement of a number of parameters which will vary according to species, the animal's environment and the scientific procedure, all of which are inter-related. Currently, there are few tools to assess the effects of lifetime events on welfare or even, in some cases, to recognise that they have an impact on the level of suffering. A matrix to assess the combined effects of environment, experimental and contingent events on welfare has been applied, retrospectively, to programmes of work involving macaques (Macaca mulatta and M. fascicularis). Lifetime records, available for animals from their birth in the breeding colony through to experimental use in vaccine efficacy evaluation studies, were analysed as a robust validation test for the assessment matrix and refinement of the way in which information on these events is captured. A meaningful assessment method is required prospectively for project licence applications and retrospectively for licence review or decisions on re-use. The analysis will provide information that would support the application of refinements that would optimally enhance the lives of experimental animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7120/09627286.24.2.139

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AWAG was developed for assessing the welfare of primates in research institutions but has since been adapted for birds, western lowland gorillas, giraffes, scimitar-horned oryx, and large felids.

    “AWAG was developed for assessing the welfare of primates in research institutions (69, 90) but has since been adapted for birds (91), western lowland gorillas (92), giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis), scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah), and large felids (tigers, leopards, and cheetahs) (26).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolfensohn, S., Sharpe, S., Hall, I., Lawrence, S., Kitchen, S., & Dennis, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Public Health England (GB)
Corresponding author
Wolfensohn, S
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2015-05
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
139-149
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W2331011820
Cited by
51
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
animal welfare assessment, animal stress, macaque, rhesus monkeys, Macaca fascicularis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review