The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Scientific Revolution
Abstract
This work contains Steven Shapin's historical exploration into the origins of the modern scientific worldview. What historians have traditionally called the Scientific Revolution was, in Shapin's view, a diversity of practices and ideas that developed over the course of nearly two centuries. Rejecting the idea that there is anything like an essence of early modern science, the author shows that the Scientific Revolution in reality lacked the jarring abruptness and cataclysmic nature implied by its revolutionary name.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics
ADLER, E. (1997) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066197003003003 · Cited by 1,446
Glennan, S. (2017) · Oxford Scholarship Online · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198779711.001.0001 · Cited by 603
Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity
Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J. (2001) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726701548001 · Cited by 489
Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective
Franco, N. (2013) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani3010238 · Cited by 265
Copernicus and His Islamic Predecessors: Some Historical Remarks
Ragep, F. J. (2007) · History of Science · doi:10.1177/007327530704500103 · Cited by 78
How Did Chinese Medicine Become Experiential? The Political Epistemology of Jingyan
Lei, S. H.-L. (2002) · positions: asia critique · doi:10.1215/10679847-10-2-333 · Cited by 69
The Cultural Evolution of Epistemic Practices: The Case of Divination
Hong, Z., & Henrich, J. (2021) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-021-09408-6 · Cited by 64
The influence of prior belief on scientific thinking
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2002) · The Cognitive Basis of Science · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613517.011 · Cited by 22
As Above, So Below. Astrology and the Inquisition in Seventeenth-Century New Spain
Avalos, A. (2007) · Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) · doi:10.2870/69590 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapin, S.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W2062475609
- Cited by
- 1,587
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 67.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
