Buddhism and Science
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both Buddhism and science make propositional claims about ultimate reality and are highly complex, totalizing worldviews.
“Both traditions make propositional claims about ultimate reality (Lopez 2008, 34) and are 'highly complex, totalizing worldviews' (Cabezón 2003, 59).”
From An All-new Timeless Truth (2017) · cites this paper as Lopez 2008, 34
Once the process of accommodation has begun, it is difficult to know when to stop.
“However, once this process has begun, it is difficult to know when to stop (Lopez 2008, 72).”
From An All-new Timeless Truth (2017) · cites this paper as Lopez 2008, 72
Lopez argues that attempts to show Buddha's wisdom is compatible with modern scientific worldviews are motivated by political self-preservation.
“Lopez suggests that attempts to show that Buddha's wisdom is compatible with modern scientific worldviews are motivated by political self-preservation.”
From An All-new Timeless Truth (2017) · cites this paper as Lopez 2008, 33
The present Shaolin interest in 'Buddhism and Medicine' can be situated on a longer continuum of Buddhist engagement with modernizing discourse through selective appropriation of the rhetoric of science.
“Work of Buddhologists such as Eric Hammerstrom and Donald Lopez remind us that the present Shaolin interest in 'Buddhism and Medicine' can be situated on a longer continuum of Buddhist engagement with modernizing discourse through selective appropriation of the rhetoric of science.”
From Desiderata for the Principles of Compilation of a Canon of Buddhism and Medicine (2017) · cites this paper as Lopez 2008
This is a rather inaccurate understanding of a rich and plural religious tradition.
“This is a rather inaccurate understanding of a rich and plural religious tradition.”
From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Leading academics of South Asian religions have highlighted the Western misreading and reconstruction of Buddhism as a rational form of inquiry focused on meditation, which has been uncritically accepted by psychology researchers.
“Leading academics of South Asian religions have highlighted the Western misreading and reconstruction of Buddhism as a rational form of inquiry focused on meditation, which has been uncritically accepted by psychology researchers56.”
From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
For most forms of Buddhism, it is not meditation but the study of sacred scriptures that is the most valued means to achieve deep personal transformation.
“For example, such authors highlight that for most forms of Buddhism, it is not meditation but the study of sacred scriptures that is the most valued means to achieve deep personal transformation.”
From The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Kreplin, U., Farias, M., & Brazil, I. A. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20299-z · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Is Mindfulness Buddhist? (and Why It Matters)
Sharf, R. H. (2015) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1363461514557561 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Has the science of mindfulness lost its mind?
Farias, M., & Wikholm, C. (2016) · BJPsych Bulletin · doi:10.1192/pb.bp.116.053686 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Is Yogācāra Phenomenology? Some Evidence from the Cheng weishi lun
Sharf, R. H. (2016) · Journal of Indian Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10781-015-9282-7 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Desiderata for the Principles of Compilation of a Canon of Buddhism and Medicine
Burton-Rose, D. (2017) · Asian Medicine · doi:10.1163/15734218-12341393 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Where angels fear to tread: neurophenomenology and the matter of belief
Harrington, L. (2012) · Religion · doi:10.1080/0048721x.2012.706064 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
McGuire, R. (2017) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2017.1396048
- Authors
- Lopez Jr., D. S.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008
- OpenAlex
- W4247700842
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 25.24
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Buddhism, science, science and religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review