Cited by 121Indian and Buddhist StudiesReligious Studies and Spiritual PracticesStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Buddhism and Science

Lopez Jr., Donald S.·2008·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226493244.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both Buddhism and science make propositional claims about ultimate reality and are highly complex, totalizing worldviews.

    “Both traditions make propositional claims about ultimate reality (Lopez 2008, 34) and are 'highly complex, totalizing worldviews' (Cabezón 2003, 59).”

    From An All-new Timeless Truth (2017) · cites this paper as Lopez 2008, 34

  • Once the process of accommodation has begun, it is difficult to know when to stop.

    “However, once this process has begun, it is difficult to know when to stop (Lopez 2008, 72).”

    From An All-new Timeless Truth (2017) · cites this paper as Lopez 2008, 72

  • Lopez argues that attempts to show Buddha's wisdom is compatible with modern scientific worldviews are motivated by political self-preservation.

    “Lopez suggests that attempts to show that Buddha's wisdom is compatible with modern scientific worldviews are motivated by political self-preservation.”

    From An All-new Timeless Truth (2017) · cites this paper as Lopez 2008, 33

  • The present Shaolin interest in 'Buddhism and Medicine' can be situated on a longer continuum of Buddhist engagement with modernizing discourse through selective appropriation of the rhetoric of science.

    “Work of Buddhologists such as Eric Hammerstrom and Donald Lopez remind us that the present Shaolin interest in 'Buddhism and Medicine' can be situated on a longer continuum of Buddhist engagement with modernizing discourse through selective appropriation of the rhetoric of science.”
  • This is a rather inaccurate understanding of a rich and plural religious tradition.

    “This is a rather inaccurate understanding of a rich and plural religious tradition.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez Jr., D. S.
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
2008
OpenAlex
W4247700842
Cited by
121
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
25.24
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Buddhism, science, science and religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review