CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda

Agrawal, Ajay, Gans, Joshua, Goldfarb, Avi·2019
DOI 10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Acemoglu, Daron. 2003. "Labor-and Capital-Augmenting Technical Change." Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (1): 1-37.
  2. Agrawal, Ajay, Joshua S. Gans, and Avi Goldfarb. 2018a. "Human Judgment and AI Pricing." American Economic Association: Papers & Proceedings, 108:58-63.
  3. ---. 2018b. Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artifi cial Intelligence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
  4. Alpaydin, Ethem. 2010. Introduction to Machine Learning, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  5. Autor, David. 2015. "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation." Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 3-30.
  6. Baker, George, Robert Gibbons, and Kevin Murphy. 1999. "Informal Authority in Organizations." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15:56-73.
  7. Belloni, Alexandre, Victor Chernozhukov, and Christian Hansen. 2014. "High- You are reading copyrighted material published by University of Chicago Press.
  8. Andrea Prat Dimensional Methods and Inference on Structural and Treatment Eff ects." Jour- nal of Economic Perspectives 28 (2): 29-50.
  9. Benzell, Seth G., Laurence J. Kotlikoff , Guillermo LaGarda, and Jeff rey D. Sachs. 2015. "Robots Are Us: Some Economics of Human Replacement." NBER Work- ing Paper no. 20941, Cambridge, MA.
  10. Bolton, P., and A. Faure-Grimaud. 2009. "Thinking Ahead: The Decision Problem." Review of Economic Studies 76:1205-38.
  11. Forbes, Silke, and Mara Lederman. 2009. "Adaptation and Vertical Integration in the Airline Industry." American Economic Review 99 (5): 1831-49.
  12. Hastie, Trevor, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome Friedman. 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
  13. Jha, S., and E. J. Topol. 2016. "Adapting to Artifi cial Intelligence: Radiologists and Pathologists as Information Specialists." Journal of the American Medical Associa- tion 316 (22): 2353-54.
  14. Simon, H. A. 1951. "A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship." Econo- metrica 19 (3): 293-305.
  15. Tadelis, S. 2002. "Complexity, Flexibility and the Make-or-Buy Decision." American Economic Review 92 (2): 433-37.
  16. Tirole, J. 2009. "Cognition and Incomplete Contracts." American Economic Review 99 (1): 265-94.
  17. Varian, Hal R. 2014. "Big Data: New Tricks for Econometrics." Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (2): 3-28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A.
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2019
DOI
10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.001.0001
Cited by
366
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review