The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These chains of events have cascading effects in that they both break and reproduce existing social formations - they are 'sequences of occurrences that result in the transformation of structures' (Sewell 2005: 227; also see: Mahoney and Schensul 2006).”
From Within and Beyond the “Fourth Generation” of Revolutionary Theory (2016) · cites this paper as Sewell 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,003 of 1,003
Appendix C Estimating Time to Defection at the Nore Mutiny
Pfaff, S. J., & Hechter, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108149853.012
Pfaff, S. J., & Hechter, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108149853.009
Pfaff, S. J., & Hechter, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108149853.004
Metadata
- Authors
- Sewell Jr., W. H.
- Venue
- University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2005
- OpenAlex
- W4235763390
- Cited by
- 1,410
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 116 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 95.24
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Historical Thought
- Social Sciences › Education › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
- Keywords
- historical reasoning, philosophy of history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
