The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survival of Outpatients with Alzheimer-type Dementia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical course of Alzheimer-type dementia and those factors that might predict or influence the length of survival. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty-six patients diagnosed with Alzheimer-type dementia were selected from among 200 consecutive outpatients evaluated for suspected dementia from 1980 to 1982. All 126 patients had at least 6 years of follow-up. SETTING: All patients were initially seen as outpatients at a university hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional hazards model. The mean age at symptom onset was 73.9 years and at enrollment in the study, 77.6 years. The median survival from time of enrollment in the study was 5.3 years (range, 0.2 to 7.2+ years) and from symptom onset, 9.3 years (range, 1.8 to 16+ years). Dementia severity, as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), was strongly associated with survival (P less than 0.001); the median survival of patients with scores of 18 or below was 3 years less than that of patients with scores above 18 (relative risk, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6 to 4.4). Comorbid conditions and symptom duration were not related to survival. A multivariate analysis of age at symptom onset and of historical features showed that the combination of wandering and falling (relative risk, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9 to 5.2) and the presence of behavioral problems (relative risk, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.7 to 2.9) at the time of evaluation appeared to adversely affect survival. CONCLUSIONS: Length of survival in patients with Alzheimer-type dementia is highly variable; severity of disease (not duration), the combination of wandering and falling, and behavioral problems are associated with shorter survival. Our findings, if confirmed, may provide prognostic information for families and professionals and suggest areas in which interventions to improve survival might be focused.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E., & Roth, M. (1968) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.114.512.797 · Cited by 4,117
Evans, D. A. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430180093036 · Cited by 1,226
Cited by
Roberson, E. D., Halabisky, B., Yoo, J. W., Yao, J., Chin, J., Yan, F., Wu, T., Hamto, P., Devidze, N., Yu, G.-Q., et al. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4152-10.2011 · Cited by 654
Survival in dementia and predictors of mortality: a review
Todd, S., Barr, S., Roberts, M., & Passmore, A. P. (2013) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.3946 · Cited by 417
White, H., Pieper, C., & Schmader, K. (1998) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb04537.x · Cited by 323
Brodaty, H., Seeher, K., & Gibson, L. (2012) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610211002924 · Cited by 248
Agüero‐Torres, H., Fratiglioni, L., Guo, Z., Viitanen, M., & Winblad, B. (1998) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02464.x · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, J. S., Welch, H. G., & Larson, E. B.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1990-09-15
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 429-434
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2051029799
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.