Cited by 1,372Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesRenin-Angiotensin System Studies

Renal Insufficiency as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Outcomes and the Impact of Ramipril: The HOPE Randomized Trial

Mann, Johannes F.E., Gerstein, Hertzel C., Pogue, Janice, Bosch, Jackie, Yusuf, Salim, for the HOPE Investigators·2001·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background The cardiovascular risk associated with early renal insufficiency is unknown. Clinicians are often reluctant to use angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with renal insufficiency. Objective To determine whether mild renal insufficiency increases cardiovascular risk and whether ramipril decreases that risk. Design Post hoc analysis. Setting The Heart Outcomes and Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, a randomized, double-blind, multinational trial involving 267 study centers. Patients 980 patients with mild renal insufficiency (serum creatinine concentration >/= 124 micromol/L [>/=1.4 mg/dL]) and 8307 patients with normal renal function (serum creatinine concentration Measurements The primary outcome measure was incidence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results Cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was higher in patients with renal insufficiency than in those without (22.2% vs. 15.1%; P 0.2 for the difference). Conclusions In patients who had preexisting vascular disease or diabetes combined with an additional cardiovascular risk factor, mild renal insufficiency significantly increased the risk for subsequent cardiovascular events. Ramipril reduced cardiovascular risk without increasing adverse effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mann, J. F. E., Gerstein, H. C., Pogue, J., Bosch, J., Yusuf, S., & for the HOPE Investigators
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2001-04-17
Volume
134
Issue
8
Pages
629-636
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2016046345
Cited by
1,372
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 77
FWCI
76.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
Keywords
renal failure, cardiovascular risk, ramipril, ACE inhibitors, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, serum creatinine, cardiovascular outcomes, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Aged, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Creatinine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Vascular Diseases, Ramipril, Statistics, Nonparametric, Diabetes Complications, Renal Insufficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review