The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening for Dementia in Primary Care: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dementia is a large and growing problem but is often not diagnosed in its earlier stages. Screening and earlier treatment could reduce the burden of suffering of this syndrome. PURPOSE: To review the evidence of benefits and harms of screening for and earlier treatment of dementia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, experts, and bibliographies of reviews. STUDY SELECTION: The authors developed eight key questions representing a logical chain between screening and improved health outcomes, along with eligibility criteria for admissible evidence for each question. Admissible evidence was obtained by searching the data sources. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers abstracted relevant information using standardized abstraction forms and graded article quality according to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: No randomized, controlled trial of screening for dementia has been completed. Brief screening tools can detect some persons with early dementia (positive predictive value < or =50%). Six to 12 months of treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors modestly slows the decline of cognitive and global clinical change scores in some patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Function is minimally affected, and fewer than 20% of patients stop taking cholinesterase inhibitors because of side effects. Only limited evidence indicates that any other pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic intervention slows decline in persons with early dementia. Although intensive multicomponent caregiver interventions may delay nursing home placement of patients who have caregivers, the relevance of this finding for persons who do not yet have caregivers is uncertain. Other potential benefits and harms of screening have not been studied. CONCLUSIONS: Screening tests can detect undiagnosed dementia. In persons with mild to moderate clinically detected Alzheimer disease, cholinesterase inhibitors are somewhat effective in slowing cognitive decline. The effect of cholinesterase inhibitors or other treatments on persons with dementia detected by screening is uncertain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci
Yudofsky, S. C., & Hales, R. E. (1992) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.4.4.359 · Cited by 3,818
A Controlled Trial of Selegiline, Alpha-Tocopherol, or Both as Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease
Sano, M., Ernesto, C., Thomas, R. G., Klauber, M. R., Schafer, K., Grundman, M., Woodbury, P., Growdon, J., Cotman, C. W., Pfeiffer, E., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704243361704 · Cited by 2,380
Petersen, R. C., Stevens, J. C., Ganguli, M., Tangalos, E. G., Cummings, J. L., & DeKosky, S. T. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.9.1133 · Cited by 2,065
Lyketsos, C. G., Lopez, O., Jones, B., Fitzpatrick, A. L., Breitner, J., & DeKosky, S. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.12.1475 · Cited by 2,049
Knopman, D. S., DeKosky, S. T., Cummings, J. L., Chui, H., Corey–Bloom, J., Relkin, N., Small, G. W., Miller, B., & Stevens, J. C. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.9.1143 · Cited by 1,410
Evans, D. A. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430180093036 · Cited by 1,226
Erkinjuntti, T., Kurz, A., Gauthier, S., Bullock, R., Lilienfeld, S., & Damaraju, C. V. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08267-3 · Cited by 752
A Prospective Study of Alzheimer Disease in Down Syndrome
Lai, F., & Williams, R. S. (1989) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1989.00520440031017 · Cited by 561
Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease.
Birks, J. S., Chong, L.-Y., & Grimley Evans, J. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001191.pub4 · Cited by 534
Treatment of agitation in AD: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial
Teri, L., Logsdon, R. G., Peskind, E., Raskind, M., Weiner, M. F., Tractenberg, R. E., Foster, N. L., Schneider, L. S., Sano, M., Whitehouse, P., et al. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.55.9.1271 · Cited by 330
Cited by
2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures
Alzheimer's Association (2016) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001 · Cited by 5,069
2019 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures.
Alzheimer's Association (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.01.010 · Cited by 2,461
2020 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures
(2020) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12068 · Cited by 2,353
2018 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures
Alzheimer's Association (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.001 · Cited by 1,912
Impact of Anticholinergics on the Aging Brain: A Review and Practical Application
Boustani, M., Campbell, N., Munger, S., Maidment, I., & Fox, C. (2008) · Aging Health · doi:10.2217/1745509x.4.3.311 · Cited by 862
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boustani, M., Peterson, B., Hanson, L., Harris, R., & Lohr, K. N.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2003-06-03
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 927-937
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1556698056
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 10.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for Dementia in Primary Care: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00015
- The paper
- Boustani, M., Peterson, B., Hanson, L., Harris, R., & Lohr, K. N. (2003). Screening for Dementia in Primary Care: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-11-200306030-00015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.