The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Protein Intake on Renal Function Decline in Women with Normal Renal Function or Mild Renal Insufficiency
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In individuals with moderate to severe renal insufficiency, low protein intake may slow renal function decline. However, the long-term impact of protein intake on renal function in persons with normal renal function or mild renal insufficiency is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether protein intake influences the rate of renal function change in women over an 11-year period. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Nurses' Health Study. PARTICIPANTS: 1624 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study who were 42 to 68 years of age in 1989 and gave blood samples in 1989 and 2000. Ninety-eight percent of women were white, and 1% were African American. MEASUREMENTS: Protein intake was measured in 1990 and 1994 by using a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire. Creatinine concentration was used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and creatinine clearance. RESULTS: In multivariate linear regression analyses, high protein intake was not significantly associated with change in estimated GFR in women with normal renal function (defined as an estimated GFR > or = 80 mL/min per 1.73 m2). Change in estimated GFR in this subgroup over the 11-year period was 0.25 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (95% CI, -0.78 to 1.28 mL/min per 1.73 m2) per 10-g increase in protein intake; the change in estimated GFR was 1.14 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (CI, -3.63 to 5.92 mL/min per 1.73 m2) after measurement-error adjustment for protein intake. In women with mild renal insufficiency (defined as an estimated GFR > 55 mL/min per 1.73 m2 but <80 mL/min per 1.73 m2), protein intake was significantly associated with a change in estimated GFR of -1.69 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (CI, -2.93 to -0.45 mL/min per 1.73 m2) per 10-g increase in protein intake. After measurement-error adjustment, the change in estimated GFR was -7.72 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (CI, -15.52 to 0.08 mL/min per 1.73 m2) per 10-g increase in protein intake, an association of borderline statistical significance. High intake of nondairy animal protein in women with mild renal insufficiency was associated with a significantly greater change in estimated GFR (-1.21 mL/min per 1.73 m2 [CI, -2.34 to -0.33 mL/min per 1.73 m2] per 10-g increase in nondairy animal protein intake). CONCLUSIONS: High protein intake was not associated with renal function decline in women with normal renal function. However, high total protein intake, particularly high intake of nondairy animal protein, may accelerate renal function decline in women with mild renal insufficiency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, among women with mild kidney insufficiency at the start of the study, high protein intake (particularly nondairy animal protein) was associated with more rapid GFR decline than expected.111”
From Evidence-Based Recommendations for Optimal Dietary Protein Intake in Older People: A Position Paper From the PROT-AGE Study Group (2013) · cites this paper as [111]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, among older women in the Nurses' Health Study (56.0 Æ 6.6 years at start of study, but not older than 68) who had normal renal function, protein intake was not associated with declining GFR over 11 years.111”
From Evidence-Based Recommendations for Optimal Dietary Protein Intake in Older People: A Position Paper From the PROT-AGE Study Group (2013) · cites this paper as [111]
Citations
Cites
Levey, A. S., Bosch, J. P., Lewis, J. B., Greene, T., Rogers, N., Roth, D., & for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group* (1999) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 · Cited by 15,079
Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire
WILLETT, W. C., SAMPSON, L., STAMPFER, M. J., ROSNER, B., BAIN, C., WITSCHI, J., HENNEKENS, C. H., & SPEIZER, F. E. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114086 · Cited by 4,274
Self-citationTotal energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses.
WILLETT, W., & STAMPFER, M. J. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114366 · Cited by 2,751
Self-citationKlahr, S., Levey, A. S., Beck, G. J., Caggiula, A. W., Hunsicker, L., Kusek, J. W., & Striker, G. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199403313301301 · Cited by 2,328
A REVIEW OF GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS1
LEMESHOW, S., & HOSMER, D. W. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113284 · Cited by 1,947
Physician's guide to popular low-carbohydrate weight-loss diets.
Blackburn, G. L., Phillips, J. C., & Morreale, S. (2001) · Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine · doi:10.3949/ccjm.68.9.761 · Cited by 60
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00219-4 · DOI
- McDowell MA, 1994, Adv Data, 255, 1
- 10.1161/01.STR.31.11.2751 · DOI
- Brndle E, 1996, Eur J Clin Nutr, 50, 734
- 10.1681/ASN.V24856 · DOI
- Hostetter TH, 1981, Am J Physiol, 241, F85
- 10.1056/NEJM198912283212601 · DOI
- Fouque D, 2000, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, CD001892
- 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92977-A · DOI
- D'Amico G, 1994, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 9, 1590
- 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9631839 · DOI · Paper page
- Gentile MG, 1993, Clin Nephrol, 40, 315
- 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1991.tb01535.x · DOI
- 10.1159/000189341 · DOI
- 10.1159/000045021 · DOI
- Jones MG, 1987, Clin Nephrol, 27, 71
- 10.1089/jwh.1997.6.49 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90310-5 · DOI
- 2002, Am J Kidney Dis, 39, S1, 10.1016/S0272-6386(02)70081-4 · DOI
- 10.1159/000180580 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb07117.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115715 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1179S · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)03057-1 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.18.9.1233 · DOI
- 10.1681/ASN.V1101169 · DOI
- Barsotti G, 1984, Clin Nephrol, 21, 54
- 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601131 · DOI
- 10.1159/000189106 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.HYP.37.2.774 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.158.9.998 · DOI
- 10.1097/00041552-200111000-00009 · DOI
- 10.1159/000186654 · DOI
- 10.1093/clinchem/40.12.2276 · DOI
- 10.1002/sim.4780080916 · DOI
- 10.1097/00041552-200109000-00001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Morley, J. E., Phillips, S., Sieber, C., Stehle, P., Teta, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021 · Cited by 2,553
Deutz, N. E. P., Bauer, J. M., Barazzoni, R., Biolo, G., Boirie, Y., Bosy-Westphal, A., Cederholm, T., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Krznariç, Z., Nair, K. S., et al. (2014) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2014.04.007 · Cited by 1,738
Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference
Tuttle, K. R., Bakris, G. L., Bilous, R. W., Chiang, J. L., de Boer, I. H., Goldstein-Fuchs, J., Hirsch, I. B., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Narva, A. S., Navaneethan, S. D., et al. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-1296 · Cited by 1,153
Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for protein
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N. A. A. (. (2012) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2557 · Cited by 739
International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: protein and exercise
Campbell, B., Kreider, R. B., Ziegenfuss, T., La Bounty, P., Roberts, M., Burke, D., Landis, J., Lopez, H., & Antonio, J. (2007) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/1550-2783-4-8 · Cited by 716
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, E. L., Stampfer, M. J., Hankinson, S. E., Spiegelman, D., & Curhan, G. C.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2003-03-18
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 460-467
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2131188896
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL34594, R01HL034594)
- National Cancer Institute (CA-87969, P01CA087969)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK052866, T32DK007791, T32DK07791, T32DK0740, DK52866)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Keywords
- protein intake, renal function decline, glomerular filtration rate, mild renal insufficiency, women, dietary protein, creatinine clearance, measurement error correction, Nurses' Health Study, kidney disease progression, creatinine
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Creatinine, Dietary Proteins, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Renal Insufficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review