The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fumbled Handoffs: One Dropped Ball after Another
Abstract
Missed follow-up of abnormal test results and resultant delays in diagnosis is a safety issue that is gaining increasing attention. Despite increases in the numbers and types of available diagnostic tests, current systems in health care do not reliably ensure that test results are received and acted upon by ordering physicians. This article examines the case of a patient whose diagnosis of tuberculosis was substantially delayed because of systems problems, including poor continuity (with multiple-provider involvement), lack of communication of test results and other clinical information, and several handoffs. Strategies to ensure adequate communication of critical information and follow-up of test results are discussed, such as explicit criteria for communication of abnormal results, test-tracking systems for ordering providers, and use of information technologies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“missed laboratory results or delayed recognition of results leads to a significant potential for outpatient diagnostic errors, adverse events and liability claims.”
From Notification of Abnormal Lab Test Results in an Electronic Medical Record: Do Any Safety Concerns Remain? (2010) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Communication breakdowns are an increasingly recognized preventable factor in medical mishaps, and emerging data suggest a high prevalence of communication breakdowns among physicians, patients, and important members of the health care team who assist with the diagnostic process.21,25–32”
From Reducing Diagnostic Errors through Effective Communication: Harnessing the Power of Information Technology (2008) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Communication breakdowns are an increasingly recognized preventable factor in medical mishaps, and emerging data suggest a high prevalence of communication breakdowns among physicians, patients, and important members of the health care team who assist with the diagnostic process.21,25–32”
From Reducing Diagnostic Errors through Effective Communication: Harnessing the Power of Information Technology (2008) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout, and Job Dissatisfaction
Aiken, L. H. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.16.1987 · Cited by 5,226
Ash, J. S. (2003) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1471 · Cited by 1,789
Effect of Reducing Interns' Work Hours on Serious Medical Errors in Intensive Care Units
Landrigan, C. P., Rothschild, J. M., Cronin, J. W., Kaushal, R., Burdick, E., Katz, J. T., Lilly, C. M., Stone, P. H., Lockley, S. W., Bates, D. W., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa041406 · Cited by 1,760 · cited 1×
“A recent study demonstrated lower error rates by medical interns working 12-hour instead of 30-hour shifts (18).”
BackgroundThe Working Hours Of Hospital Staff Nurses And Patient Safety
Rogers, A. E., Hwang, W.-T., Scott, L. D., Aiken, L. H., & Dinges, D. F. (2004) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.202 · Cited by 952 · cited 1×
“With respect to human factors, little is known about the detrimental effects of physician workload on quality and safety, although there have been several studies of the correlation between nurse staffing and errors (16, 17).”
BackgroundDoes Housestaff Discontinuity of Care Increase the Risk for Preventable Adverse Events?
Petersen, L. A., Brennan, T. A., O'Neil, A. C., Cook, E. F., & Lee, T. H. (1994) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-121-11-199412010-00008 · Cited by 665
Physician-patient communication. A key to malpractice prevention.
Levinson, W. (1994) · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520200075039 · Cited by 318
Poon, E. G., Gandhi, T. K., Sequist, T. D., Murff, H. J., Karson, A. S., & Bates, D. W. (2004) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.164.20.2223 · Cited by 301
Self-citationKuperman, G. J., Teich, J. M., Tanasijevic, M. J., Ma'Luf, N., Rittenberg, E., Jha, A., Fiskio, J., Winkelman, J., & Bates, D. W. (1999) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.1999.0060512 · Cited by 252
Physician-patient communication. A key to malpractice prevention
Levinson, W. S. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.272.20.1619 · Cited by 243
Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes.
Stiell, A., Forster, A. J., Stiell, I. G., & van Walraven, C. (2003) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 241
Marcus, A. C., Crane, L. A., Kaplan, C. P., Reading, A. E., Savage, E. W., Gunning, J. E., Bernstein, G. S., & Berek, J. S. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199203000-00004 · Cited by 198
Laboratory Critical Values Policies and Procedures
Howanitz, P. J., Steindel, S. J., & Heard, N. V. (2002) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2002-126-0663-lcvpap · Cited by 173
Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms
Poon, E. G., Haas, J. S., Puopolo, A. L., Gandhi, T. K., Burdick, E., Bates, D. W., & Brennan, T. A. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30357.x · Cited by 138
Self-citationDesign and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager
Poon, E. G., Wang, S. J., Gandhi, T. K., Bates, D. W., & Kuperman, G. J. (2003) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1532-0464(03)00061-3 · Cited by 111
Patient Notification and Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results: A Physician Survey
Boohaker, E. A. (1996) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1996.00440030133016 · Cited by 111
Communicating Findings of Radiologic Examinations
Berlin, L. (2002) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.178.4.1780809 · Cited by 109
Differences in the quality of care for women with an abnormal mammogram or breast complaint
Haas, J. S., Cook, E. F., Puopolo, A. L., Burstin, H. R., & Brennan, T. A. (2000) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08030.x · Cited by 56
Critical Values in Surgical Pathology
Pereira, T. C., Liu, Y., & Silverman, J. F. (2004) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1309/7nrw-7g68-4vep-wpmr · Cited by 38
Critical Values in Surgical Pathology
Pereira, T. C., Liu, Y., & Silverman, J. F. (2004) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1309/7nrw7g684vepwpmr · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Stiell A, 2003, CMAJ, 169, 1023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims
Gandhi, T. K., Kachalia, A., Thomas, E. J., Puopolo, A. L., Yoon, C., Brennan, T. A., & Studdert, D. M. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00006 · Cited by 662
Self-citationThe Global Burden of Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care
Singh, H., Schiff, G. D., Graber, M. L., Onakpoya, I., & Thompson, M. J. (2017) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005401 · Cited by 395
Residents’ and Attending Physicians’ Handoffs: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Riesenberg, L. A., Leitzsch, J., Massucci, J. L., Jaeger, J., Rosenfeld, J. C., Patow, C., Padmore, J. S., & Karpovich, K. P. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181bf51a6 · Cited by 345
Transfers of Patient Care Between House Staff on Internal Medicine Wards: A National Survey
Horwitz, L. I., Krumholz, H. M., Green, M. L., & Huot, S. J. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.11.1173 · Cited by 286
Singh, H., Thomas, E. J., Mani, S., Sittig, D., Arora, H., Espadas, D., Khan, M. M., & Petersen, L. A. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.263 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Gandhi, T. K.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gandhi, Tejal K.
- ORCID
- Gandhi, Tejal K.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 352-358
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W2013795407
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 21.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- California Health Care Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- delayed diagnosis, laboratory abnormalities, handover, continuity of care, information technology, patient safety, tuberculosis diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Communication, Continuity of Patient Care, Cough, Diagnostic Errors, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Male, Patient Care Team, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, United States, Weight Loss, Fatal Outcome, Pneumonia, Bacterial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
