Cited by 533Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aspirin for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*·2009·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2002 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation about the use of aspirin for the prevention of coronary heart disease. METHODS: Review of the literature since 2002, focusing on new evidence on the benefits and harms of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction and stroke. The new evidence was reviewed and synthesized according to sex. RECOMMENDATIONS: Encourage men age 45 to 79 years to use aspirin when the potential benefit of a reduction in myocardial infarctions outweighs the potential harm of an increase in gastrointestinal hemorrhage. (A recommendation) Encourage women age 55 to 79 years to use aspirin when the potential benefit of a reduction in ischemic strokes outweighs the potential harm of an increase in gastrointestinal hemorrhage. (A recommendation) Evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of aspirin for cardiovascular disease prevention in men and women 80 years or older. (I statement) Do not encourage aspirin use for cardiovascular disease prevention in women younger than 55 years and in men younger than 45 years. (D recommendation).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-150-6-200903170-00008

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Thom T, 2006, Circulation, 113, 85

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 533

Metadata

Authors
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
Corresponding author
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2009-03-17
Volume
150
Issue
6
Pages
396-404
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2599856343
Cited by
533
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 71
FWCI
45.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
aspirin, cardiovascular disease prevention, primary prevention, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, sex differences, benefit-harm balance, USPSTF recommendations
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aspirin, Cardiovascular Diseases, Brain Ischemia, Female, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Primary Prevention, Cost of Illness, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review