Cited by 27Asthma and respiratory diseasesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Internet-Based Self-management Plus Education Compared With Usual Care in Asthma: A Randomized Trial

van der Meer, Victor, Bakker, Moira J., van den Hout, Wilbert B., Rabe, Klaus F., Sterk, Peter J., Kievit, Job, Assendelft, Willem J.J., Sont, Jacob K. +1 more·2009·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: The Internet may support patient self-management of chronic conditions, such as asthma. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Internet-based asthma self-management. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: 37 general practices and 1 academic outpatient department in the Netherlands. Patients: 200 adults with asthma who were treated with inhaled corticosteroids for 3 months or more during the previous year and had access to the Internet. Measurements: Asthma-related quality of life at 12 months (minimal clinically significant difference of 0.5 on the 7-point scale), asthma control, symptom-free days, lung function, and exacerbations. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned by using a computer-generated permuted block scheme to Internet-based self-management (n = 101) or usual care (n = 99). The Internet-based self-management program included weekly asthma control monitoring and treatment advice, online and group education, and remote Web communications. Results: Asthma-related quality of life improved by 0.56 and 0.18 points in the Internet and usual care groups, respectively (adjusted between-group difference, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.56]). An improvement of 0.5 point or more occurred in 54% and 27% of Internet and usual care patients, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 2.00 [CI, 1.38 to 3.04]). Asthma control improved more in the Internet group than in the usual care group (adjusted difference, −0.47 [CI, −0.64 to −0.30]). At 12 months, 63% of Internet patients and 52% of usual care patients reported symptom-free days in the previous 2 weeks (adjusted absolute difference, 10.9% [CI, 0.05% to 21.3%]). Prebronchodilator FEV1 changed with 0.24 L and −0.01 L for Internet and usual care patients, respectively (adjusted difference, 0.25 L [CI, 0.03 to 0.46 L]). Exacerbations did not differ between groups. Limitation: The study was unblinded and lasted only 12 months. Conclusion: Internet-based self-management resulted in improvements in asthma control and lung function but did not reduce exacerbations, and improvement in asthma-related quality of life was slightly less than clinically significant. Primary Funding Source: Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, ZonMw, and Netherlands Asthma Foundation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-00008

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Meer, V., Bakker, M. J., van den Hout, W. B., Rabe, K. F., Sterk, P. J., Kievit, J., Assendelft, W. J. J., Sont, J. K., & for the SMASHING (Self-Management in Asthma Supported by Hospitals, I.
Affiliations
  • From Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2009-07-21
Volume
151
Issue
2
Pages
110-120
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W1485871038
Cited by
6
References
32
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
asthma, patient education, asthma control, asthma quality of life, lung function, asthma exacerbations, inhaled corticosteroids, online health education, adult asthma, usual care comparison, general practitioner care, outpatient care, symptom-free days, FEV1, online intervention, chronic disease self-management, telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review