Cited by 54Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationAsthma and respiratory diseasesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Controlling Asthma Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Zhao, Jie, Zhai, Yun-kai, Zhu, Wei-jun, Sun, Dong-xu·2015·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of telemedicine for the management of chronic diseases is unclear. This study examined the effectiveness of telemedicine in relieving asthma symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases was conducted until December 31, 2013 using the following key words: "asthma," "telemedicine," "telehealth," "e-health," "mobile health," "Internet," "telecommunication," "telemanagement," "remote," and "short message service." Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trial, a diagnosis of asthma, the majority of the patients were ≥18 years of age, and intervention involved any format of telemedicine. A meta-analysis of eligible studies was conducted with the primary outcome being change of asthma symptoms. RESULTS: Of 813 articles identified, 11 were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 6 were included in the meta-analysis. Among the 11 studies, there were 1,460 patients in the intervention groups and 1,349 in the control groups, and the total numbers of participants ranged from 12 to 481 in the intervention groups and from 12 to 487 in the control groups. The mean age of patients ranged in the intervention groups from 34.4 to 54.6 years and in the control groups from 30.7 to 56.4 years. The treatment duration ranged from 0.5 to 12 months. The meta-analysis of six eligible studies revealed no significant difference in asthma symptom score change between the telemedicine and control groups (pooled Hedges's g=0.34, 95% confidence interval=-0.05 to 0.74, Z=1.69, p=0.090). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine interventions do not appear to improve asthma function scores, but other benefits may be present.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2014.0119

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, J., Zhai, Y.-K., Zhu, W.-J., & Sun, D.-X.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
  • Henan Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Corresponding author
Zhao, Jie
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2015-06
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
484-492
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W1529773899
Cited by
54
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
telemedicine, asthma, asthma symptom control, mobile health, remote patient care, chronic disease management
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Asthma, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Telemedicine, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review