The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do No Harm
Abstract
This essay considers at length some ethical, philosophical implications of the medical maxim, "Do no harm" (or "Primum non nocere"). It helps to designate the practice of medicine as a moral enterprise. It implies that the physician will render due care, but that "due care" will take into account both the risk-benefit ratio and the benefit-detriment equation. The essay closes with a brief discussion of euthanasia considered in the light of the maxim.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00029.x · Cited by 959
Hulley, S. B., Rosenman, R. H., Bawol, R. D., & Brand, R. J. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198006193022503 · Cited by 702
Exploiting the curative potential of adoptive T‐cell therapy for cancer
Hinrichs, C. S., & Rosenberg, S. A. (2014) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12132 · Cited by 466
Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making
Bartels, D. M. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001 · Cited by 435
When 'Do No Harm' Is Not Enough: The Ethics of Research with Refugees and Other Vulnerable Groups
Hugman, R., Pittaway, E., & Bartolomei, L. (2011) · British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr013 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- JONSEN, A. R.
- Venue
- Annals of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American College of Physicians
- Published
- 1978-06-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 827-832
- ISSN
- 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-3704
- OpenAlex
- W1988679281
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do No Harm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0003-4819-88-6-827
- The paper
- JONSEN, A. R. (1978). Do No Harm. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-88-6-827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.