CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 693Social Media and PoliticsGender, Feminism, and MediaMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

#HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice

Open access
Jackson, Sarah J., Bailey, Moya, Foucault Welles, Brooke·2020·MIT Press
DOI 10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this book, Sarah Jackson, Moya Bailey, and Brooke Foucault Welles explore how and why Twitter has become an important platform for historically disenfranchised populations, including Black Americans, women, and transgender people. They show how marginalized groups, long excluded from elite media spaces, have used Twitter hashtags to advance counternarratives, preempt political spin, and build diverse networks of dissent. The authors describe how such hashtags as #MeToo, #SurvivorPrivilege, and #WhyIStayed have challenged the conventional understanding of gendered violence; examine the voices and narratives of Black feminism enabled by #FastTailedGirls, #YouOKSis, and #SayHerName; and explore the creation and use of #GirlsLikeUs, a network of transgender women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–632 of 632

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B.
ORCID
Venue
MIT Press
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2020-03-10
DOI
10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001
OpenAlex
W4251102464
Cited by
693
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 35
FWCI
48.85
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
hashtag activism, Twitter, social media activism, marginalized communities, counter-narratives, political spin, #MeToo, #BlackLivesMatter, gender-based violence, Black feminism, transgender women, racial justice, police killings, online mobilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review