Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes
Abstract
Why do human beings move? In this lucid portrayal of human behavior, Fred Dretske provides an original account of the way reasons function in the causal explanation of behavior. Biological science investigates what makes our bodies move in the way they do. Psychology is interested in why persons—agents with reasons—move in the way they do. Dretske attempts to reconcile these different points of view by showing how reasons operate in a world of causes. He reveals in detail how the character of our inner states—what we believe, desire, and intend—determines what we do. Bradford Books imprint
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A more substantive notion of agency can be defined by adding three conditions to Russell and Norvig's account: the system's outputs affect its subsequent inputs; agents pursue goals; and the system must learn to produce goal-conducive outputs.
“A more substantive notion of agency can be defined by adding three conditions to Russell and Norvig's account.”
From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Dretske 1988
Zombie-Jackson has intentional states.
“Contrary to Searle, a good case can be made that zombie-Jackson does have intentional states.”
From Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind-Body Problem (1999) · cites this paper as Dretske 1988
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How People Explain Behavior: A New Theoretical Framework
Malle, B. F. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_2 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind-Body Problem
Balog, K. (1999) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2998286 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness
Butlin, P., Long, R., Elmoznino, E., Bengio, Y., Birch, J., Constant, A., Deane, G., Fleming, S. M., Frith, C., Ji, X., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08708 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00057678 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Empirical perspectives from the self-model theory of subjectivity: a brief summary with examples
Metzinger, T. (2007) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(07)68018-2 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
SCARANTINO, A., & PICCININI, G. (2010) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2010.01632.x · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Plantinga on functions and the theory of evolution
Levin, M. (1997) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048409712347691 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Reinforcement learning and artificial agency
Butlin, P. (2024) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12458 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Apples and oranges: The pitfalls of comparative intelligence
Savage, A., & Snowdon, C. T. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00057897 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Dennett's realisation theory of the relation between folk and scientific psychology
Cussins, A. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058659 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Traces of thinking: a stigmergic approach to 4E cognition
Sims, R. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05074-8 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dretske, F.
- Corresponding author
- Dretske, Fred
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1988-04-28
- OpenAlex
- W4245007993
- Cited by
- 1,512
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 88.86
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
- Keywords
- reason, causal explanation, human behavior, intentional action, agency, belief and desire, intention, philosophy of action, psychology of action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review