The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intentions in Communication
Abstract
Intentions in Communication brings together major theorists from artificial intelligence and computer science, linguistics, philosophy, and psychology whose work develops the foundations for an account of the role of intentions in a comprehensive theory of communication. It demonstrates, for the first time, the emerging cooperation among disciplines concerned with the fundamental role of intention in communication. The fourteen contributions in this book address central questions about the nature of intention as it is understood in theories of communication, the crucial role of intention recognition in understanding utterances, the use of principles of rational interaction in interpreting speech acts, the contribution of intonation contours to intention recognition, and the need for more general models of intention that support a view of dialogue as a collaborative activity. Contributors Michael E. Bratman, Philip R. Cohen, Hector J. Levesque, Martha E. Pollack, Henry Kautz, Andrew J. I. Jones, C. Raymond Perrault, Daniel Vanderveken, Janet Pierrehumbert, Julia Hirschberg, Richmond H. Thomason, Diane J Litman, James F. Allen, John R. Searle, Barbara J. Grosz, Candace L. Sidner, Herbert H. Clark and Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs. The book also includes commentaries by James F. Allen, W. A Woods, Jerry Morgan, Jerrold M. Sadock Jerry R. Hobbs, and Kent Bach. Intentions in Communication is included in the System Development Foundation Benchmark Series. Bradford Books imprint
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving
Fikes, R. E., & Nilsson, N. J. (1971) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(71)90010-5 · Cited by 4,882
Circumscription—A form of non-monotonic reasoning
McCarthy, J. (1980) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90011-9 · Cited by 2,017
Cited by
Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_7 · Cited by 1,699
The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View
Tuomela, R. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001 · Cited by 840
Spoken dialogue technology: enabling the conversational user interface
McTear, M. F. (2002) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/505282.505285 · Cited by 571
Narrative Planning: Balancing Plot and Character
Riedl, M. O., & Young, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2989 · Cited by 522
Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead
Taboada, M., & Mann, W. C. (2006) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445606061881 · Cited by 451
Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K. (2008) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2007.06.005 · Cited by 256
Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue
Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2011) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2010.10.003 · Cited by 254
The J_ToBi Model of Japanese Intonation
Venditti, J. J. (2005) · Prosodic Typology · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0007 · Cited by 212
Towards a typology of focus realization
Büring, D. (2009) · Information Structure · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0008 · Cited by 182
Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S. (1999) · Applied Logic Series · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9204-8_10 · Cited by 177
Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English
Clopper, C. G., & Smiljanic, R. (2011) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.006 · Cited by 162
(1995) · Cited by 128
Speech and language markers of neurodegeneration: a call for global equity
García, A. M., de Leon, J., Tee, B. L., Blasi, D. E., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad253 · Cited by 102
Shport, I. A. (2015) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4922468 · Cited by 17
Planning for Collective Agency
Butterfill, S. A. (2015) · Collective Agency and Cooperation in Natural and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15515-9_8 · Cited by 13
Praxeology Approaches Technology: The Ontology and Epistemology of Our Technological Practices
Lawler, D. (2018) · Philosophy of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71958-0_2 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Venue
- The MIT Press eBooks
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 1990-06-28
- OpenAlex
- W2088284440
- Cited by
- 892
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 152.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.