Cited by 487Face Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysisVisual perception and processing mechanisms

What's lost in inverted faces?

Open access
Rhodes, Gillian, Brake, Susan, Atkinson, Anthony P.·1993·Cognition

Abstract

Disproportionate inversion decrements for recognizing faces and other homogeneous stimuli are often interpreted as evidence that experts use relational features to recognize stimuli that share a configuration. However, it has never directly been shown that inversion disrupts the coding of relational features more than isolated features. Here we report three studies that compare inversion decrements for detecting changes that span the isolated-relational features continuum. Relatively large inversion decrements occurred for relational features (Thatcher illusion changes, internal feature spacing), with smaller decrements for isolated features (presence/absence of facial hair or glasses). The one discrepancy was a relatively large inversion decrement for detecting changes to the eyes and mouth, which we had classified as an isolated feature change. However, this decrement disappeared when the features were presented out of the face context (Experiments 2 and 3), suggesting that it occurs because subjects spontaneously code relations between the features and the rest of the face. Although the results support the interpretation of disproportionate inversion effects as evidence of relational coding, the difficulty of classifying changes as isolated or relational highlights an undesirable ambiguity in the isolated-relational feature distinction. We therefore consider alternative construals of the configural coding notion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90061-y

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhodes, G., Brake, S., & Atkinson, A. P.
Affiliations
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Corresponding author
Rhodes, Gillian
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
25-57
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970653464
Cited by
487
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
face inversion, face recognition (cognition), relational features
MeSH terms
Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review