Cited by 98Cell Image Analysis TechniquesMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesDigital Image Processing Techniques

A versatile pipeline for the multi-scale digital reconstruction and quantitative analysis of 3D tissue architecture

Open access
Morales-Navarrete, Hernán, Segovia-Miranda, Fabián, Klukowski, Piotr, Meyer, Kirstin, Nonaka, Hidenori, Marsico, Giovanni, Chernykh, Mikhail, Kalaidzidis, Alexander +2 more·2015·eLife

Abstract

A prerequisite for the systems biology analysis of tissues is an accurate digital three-dimensional reconstruction of tissue structure based on images of markers covering multiple scales. Here, we designed a flexible pipeline for the multi-scale reconstruction and quantitative morphological analysis of tissue architecture from microscopy images. Our pipeline includes newly developed algorithms that address specific challenges of thick dense tissue reconstruction. Our implementation allows for a flexible workflow, scalable to high-throughput analysis and applicable to various mammalian tissues. We applied it to the analysis of liver tissue and extracted quantitative parameters of sinusoids, bile canaliculi and cell shapes, recognizing different liver cell types with high accuracy. Using our platform, we uncovered an unexpected zonation pattern of hepatocytes with different size, nuclei and DNA content, thus revealing new features of liver tissue organization. The pipeline also proved effective to analyse lung and kidney tissue, demonstrating its generality and robustness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.11214

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In uninjured adult mouse livers, hepatocyte volume ranges from 3,126 μm3 to 10,606 μm3.

    “In uninjured adult mouse livers, hepatocyte volume ranges from 3,126 μm3 to 10,606 μm3.28”

    From Distinct hepatocyte identities in liver homeostasis and regeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

    In Results, “New insights into liver tissue organization from the geometrical model” (page not provided), the paper reports 3,126 ± 1,302 and 10,606 ± 1,532 µm³ as mean volumes of two hepatocyte subpopulations measured in adult mice. They are not the minimum and maximum hepatocyte volumes, so describing them as the endpoints of a range misstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Normal ploidies observed among adult mouse hepatocytes are diploid (2n), tetraploid (4n) and octaploid (8n); and 4n and 8n hepatocytes often have two nuclei (bi-nucleated).

    “Normal ploidies observed among adult mouse hepatocytes are diploid (2n), tetraploid (4n) and octaploid (8n); and 4n and 8n hepatocytes often have two nuclei (bi-nucleated).28”
  • In uninjured mouse livers, 2n mononuclear diploid and 2x2n binuclear tetraploid hepatocytes are more frequent in zone 1 and zone 3, while 2x4n binuclear octaploid hepatocytes are more frequent in zone 2, with 4n mononuclear hepatocytes distributed evenly across the lobule.

    “In uninjured mouse livers, there is some correlation between hepatocyte size and ploidy and their location within the lobule. 2n mononuclear diploid and 2x2n binuclear tetraploid hepatocytes are more frequent in zone 1 and zone 3, while 2x4n binuclear octaploid hepatocytes are more frequent in zone 2, with 4n mononuclear hepatocytes distributed evenly across the lobule.28”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. Amat F Lemon W Mossing DP McDole K Wan Y Branson K Myers EW Keller PJ 2014 Fast, accurate reconstruction of cell lineages from large-scale fluorescence microscopy data Nature Methods 11 951 958 10.1038/nmeth.3036 25042785 · DOI
  2. Asahina K Shiokawa M Ueki T Yamasaki C Aratani A Tateno C Yoshizato K 2006 Multiplicative mononuclear small hepatocytes in adult rat liver: their isolation as a homogeneous population and localization to periportal zone Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 342 1160 1167 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.02.076 16516159 · DOI
  3. Baratta JL Ngo A Lopez B Kasabwalla N Longmuir KJ Robertson RT 2009 Cellular organization of normal mouse liver: a histological, quantitative immunocytochemical, and fine structural analysis Histochemistry and Cell Biology 131 713 726 10.1007/s00418-009-0577-1 19255771 PMC2761764 · DOI
  4. Barbier de Reuille P Routier-Kierzkowska AL Kierzkowski D Bassel GW Schüpbach T Tauriello G Bajpai N Strauss S Weber A Kiss A Burian A Hofhuis H Sapala A Lipowczan M Heimlicher MB Robinson S Bayer EM Basler K Koumoutsakos P Roeder AH Aegerter-Wilmsen T Nakayama N Tsiantis M Hay A Kwiatkowska D Xenarios I Kuhlemeier C Smith RS 2015 MorphoGraphX: a platform for quantifying morphogenesis in 4D eLife 4 10.7554/eLife.05864 PMC4421794 25946108 · DOI
  5. Beck A Teboulle M 2009 Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems IEEE Transactions on Image Processing: A Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society 18 2419 2434 10.1109/TIP.2009.2028250 19635705 · DOI
  6. Bilgin CC Kim S Leung E Chang H Parvin B 2013 Integrated profiling of three dimensional cell culture models and 3D microscopy Bioinformatics 29 3087 3093 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt535 24045773 PMC3834800 · DOI
  7. Bock M Tyagi AK Kreft JU Alt W 2010 Generalized voronoi tessellation as a model of two-dimensional cell tissue dynamics Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 72 1696 1731 10.1007/s11538-009-9498-3 20082148 · DOI
  8. Boehm B Westerberg H Lesnicar-Pucko G Raja S Rautschka M Cotterell J Swoger J Sharpe J 2010 The role of spatially controlled cell proliferation in limb bud morphogenesis PLoS Biology 8 e11214 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000420 PMC2903592 20644711 · DOI
  9. Bouwens L De Bleser P Vanderkerken K Geerts B Wisse E 1992 Liver cell heterogeneity: functions of non-parenchymal cells Enzyme 46 155 168 1289080
  10. Bria A Iannello G 2012 TeraStitcher - a tool for fast automatic 3D-stitching of teravoxel-sized microscopy images BMC Bioinformatics 13 10.1186/1471-2105-13-316 PMC3582611 23181553 · DOI
  11. Brink AD 1996 Using spatial information as an aid to maximum entropy image threshold selection Pattern Recognition Letters 17 29 36 10.1016/0167-8655(95)00096-8 · DOI
  12. Brown M Lowe DG 2003 Recognising panoramas Ninth Ieee International Conference on Computer Vision, Vols I and Ii 1218 1225
  13. Burt PJ Adelson EH 1983 A multiresolution spline with application to image mosaics ACM Transactions on Graphics 2 217 236 10.1145/245.247 · DOI
  14. Burton GJ Ingram SC Palmer ME 1987 The influence of mode of fixation on morphometrical data derived from terminal villi in the human placenta at term: a comparison of immersion and perfusion fixation Placenta 8 37 51 10.1016/0143-4004(87)90038-5 3295856 · DOI
  15. Chittajallu DR Florian S Kohler RH Iwamoto Y Orth JD Weissleder R Danuser G Mitchison TJ 2015 In vivo cell-cycle profiling in xenograft tumors by quantitative intravital microscopy Nature Methods 12 577 585 10.1038/nmeth.3363 25867850 PMC4579269 · DOI
  16. Chung K Deisseroth K 2013 CLARITY for mapping the nervous system Nature Methods 10 508 513 10.1038/nmeth.2481 23722210 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Coleman AW Maguire MJ Coleman JR 1981 Mithramycin- and 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (dAPI)-DNA staining for fluorescence microspectrophotometric measurement of DNA in nuclei, plastids, and virus particles Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry 29 959 968 10.1177/29.8.6168681 6168681 · DOI
  18. Collins T 2007 ImageJ for microscopy BioTechniques 43 S25 S30 10.2144/000112517 17936939 · DOI
  19. de Chaumont F Dallongeville S Chenouard N Hervé N Pop S Provoost T Meas-Yedid V Pankajakshan P Lecomte T Le Montagner Y Lagache T Dufour A Olivo-Marin JC 2012 Icy: an open bioimage informatics platform for extended reproducible research Nature Methods 9 690 696 10.1038/nmeth.2075 22743774 · DOI
  20. Dima AA Elliott JT Filliben JJ Halter M Peskin A Bernal J Kociolek M Brady MC Tang HC Plant AL 2011 Comparison of segmentation algorithms for fluorescence microscopy images of cells Cytometry Part A 79A 545 559 10.1002/cyto.a.21079 21674772 · DOI
  21. Dmitrieva NI Cui K Kitchaev DA Zhao K Burg MB 2011 DNA double-strand breaks induced by high NaCl occur predominantly in gene deserts Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 20796 20801 10.1073/pnas.1114677108 22106305 PMC3251130 · DOI
  22. Duda R Hart P Stork D 2001 Pattern Classification New York John Wiley & Sons
  23. Einstein AJ Wu H-S Sanchez M Gil J 1998 Fractal characterization of chromatin appearance for diagnosis in breast cytology The Journal of Pathology 185 366 381 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199808)185:4<366::AID-PATH122>3.0.CO;2-C 9828835 · DOI
  24. Emmenlauer M Ronneberger O Ponti A Schwarb P Griffa A Filippi A Nitschke R Driever W Burkhardt H 2009 XuvTools: free, fast and reliable stitching of large 3D datasets Journal of Microscopy 233 42 60 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.03094.x 19196411 · DOI
  25. Faggioli F Vezzoni P Montagna C 2011 Single-cell analysis of ploidy and centrosomes underscores the peculiarity of normal hepatocytes PloS One 6 e11214 10.1371/journal.pone.0026080 PMC3192148 22022514 · DOI
  26. Fisher RA 1936 The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems Annals of Eugenics 7 179 188 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x · DOI
  27. Fonseca CG Backhaus M Bluemke DA Britten RD Chung JD Cowan BR Dinov ID Finn JP Hunter PJ Kadish AH Lee DC Lima JA Medrano-Gracia P Shivkumar K Suinesiaputra A Tao W Young AA 2011 The cardiac atlas project--an imaging database for computational modeling and statistical atlases of the heart Bioinformatics 27 2288 2295 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr360 21737439 PMC3150036 · DOI
  28. Font-Burgada J Shalapour S Ramaswamy S Hsueh B Rossell D Umemura A Taniguchi K Nakagawa H Valasek MA Ye L Kopp JL Sander M Carter H Deisseroth K Verma IM Karin M 2015 Hybrid periportal hepatocytes regenerate the injured liver without giving rise to cancer Cell 162 766 779 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.026 26276631 PMC4545590 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Friebel A Neitsch J Johann T Hammad S Hengstler JG Drasdo D Hoehme S 2015 TiQuant: software for tissue analysis, quantification and surface reconstruction Bioinformatics 31 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv346 26040455 · DOI
  30. Friedman N Geiger D Goldszmidt M 1997 Bayesian network classifiers Machine Learning 29 131 163 10.1023/A:1007465528199 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Friedman N Nachman I Peer D 1999 Learning bayesian network structure from massive datasets: the "sparse candidate" algorithm Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings 206 215
  32. Gage GJ Kipke DR Shain W 2012 Whole animal perfusion fixation for rodents Journal of Visualized Experiments 10.3791/3564 PMC3476408 22871843 · DOI
  33. Gandillet A Alexandre E Holl V Royer C Bischoff P Cinqualbre J Wolf P Jaeck D Richert L 2003 Hepatocyte ploidy in normal young rat Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A, Molecular & Integrative Physiology 134 665 673 12600676
  34. Gentric G Desdouets C 2014 Polyploidization in liver tissue The American Journal of Pathology 184 322 331 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.06.035 24140012 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Girish V Vijayalakshmi A 2004 Affordable image analysis using NIH Image/ImageJ Indian Journal of Cancer 41 15105580
  36. Griffiths TR Nerukh DA Eremenko SA 1999 The application of theoretical models of complex shape to the fitting of experimental spectra having closely overlapping bands Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 1 3199 3208 10.1039/a902569c · DOI
  37. Hammad S Hoehme S Friebel A von Recklinghausen I Othman A Begher-Tibbe B Reif R Godoy P Johann T Vartak A Golka K Bucur PO Vibert E Marchan R Christ B Dooley S Meyer C Ilkavets I Dahmen U Dirsch O Böttger J Gebhardt R Drasdo D Hengstler JG 2014 Protocols for staining of bile canalicular and sinusoidal networks of human, mouse and pig livers, three-dimensional reconstruction and quantification of tissue microarchitecture by image processing and analysis Archives of Toxicology 88 1161 1183 10.1007/s00204-014-1243-5 24748404 PMC3996365 · DOI
  38. Haralick RM Shanmugam K Dinstein Its'Hak 1973 Textural features for image classification IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 3 610 621 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hardman RC Volz DC Kullman SW Hinton DE 2007 An in vivo look at vertebrate liver architecture: three-dimensional reconstructions from medaka (oryzias latipes) Anatomical Record 290 770 782 10.1002/ar.20524 17516461 · DOI
  40. Hayworth KJ Xu CS Lu Z Knott GW Fetter RD Tapia JC Lichtman JW Hess HF 2015 Ultrastructurally smooth thick partitioning and volume stitching for large-scale connectomics Nature Methods 12 10.1038/nmeth.3292 PMC4382383 25686390 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Heckerman D Geiger D Chickering DM 1995 Learning bayesian networks: the combination of knowledge and statistical data Machine Learning 20 197 243 10.1007/BF00994016 · DOI
  42. Hoehme S Brulport M Bauer A Bedawy E Schormann W Hermes M Puppe V Gebhardt R Zellmer S Schwarz M Bockamp E Timmel T Hengstler JG Drasdo D 2010 Prediction and validation of cell alignment along microvessels as order principle to restore tissue architecture in liver regeneration Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 10371 10376 10.1073/pnas.0909374107 20484673 PMC2890786 · DOI
  43. Huisman A Ploeger LS Dullens HF Jonges TN Belien JA Meijer GA Poulin N Grizzle WE van Diest PJ 2007 Discrimination between benign and malignant prostate tissue using chromatin texture analysis in 3-d by confocal laser scanning microscopy The Prostate 67 248 254 10.1002/pros.20507 17075809 · DOI
  44. Hunter PJ Crampin EJ Nielsen PM 2008 Bioinformatics, multiscale modeling and the IUPS physiome project Briefings in Bioinformatics 9 333 343 10.1093/bib/bbn024 18477639 · DOI
  45. Irvin CG Bates JH 2003 Measuring the lung function in the mouse: the challenge of size Respiratory Research 4 PMC184039 12783622
  46. Kapur JN Sahoo PK Wong AKC 1985 A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 29 273 285 10.1016/0734-189X(85)90125-2 · DOI
  47. Ke MT Fujimoto S Imai T 2013 SeeDB: a simple and morphology-preserving optical clearing agent for neuronal circuit reconstruction Nature Neuroscience 16 1154 1161 10.1038/nn.3447 23792946 · DOI
  48. Kmieć Z 2001 Cooperation of liver cells in health and disease Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology 161 1 151 10.1007/978-3-642-56553-3 11729749 · DOI
  49. Kuntz E Kuntz H-D 2006 Hepatology Principles and Practice History - Morphology - Biochemistry - Diagnostics Clinic - Therapy Berlin Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg
  50. Lee SC Bajcsy P 2006 Intensity correction of fluorescent confocal laser scanning microscope images by mean-weight filtering Journal of Microscopy 221 122 136 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01546.x 16499551 · DOI
  51. Levitt JJ Westin C-F Nestor PG Estepar RSJ Dickey CC Voglmaier MM Seidman LJ Kikinis R Jolesz FA McCarley RW Shenton ME 2004 Shape of caudate nucleus and its cognitive correlates in neuroleptic-naive schizotypal personality disorder Biological Psychiatry 55 177 184 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.08.005 14732598 PMC2793335 · DOI
  52. Lin G Chawla MK Olson K Barnes CA Guzowski JF Bjornsson C Shain W Roysam B 2007 A multi-model approach to simultaneous segmentation and classification of heterogeneous populations of cell nuclei in 3D confocal microscope images Cytometry. Part a: The Journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology 71 724 736 10.1002/cyto.a.20430 17654650 · DOI
  53. Lopes R Betrouni N 2009 Fractal and multifractal analysis: a review Medical Image Analysis 13 634 649 10.1016/j.media.2009.05.003 19535282 · DOI
  54. Lorensen WE Cline HE 1987 Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 21 163 169 10.1145/37402.37422 · DOI
  55. Luisier F Vonesch C Blu T Unser M 2010 Fast interscale wavelet denoising of poisson-corrupted images Signal Processing 90 415 427 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.07.009 · DOI
  56. Malik R Selden C Hodgson H 2002 The role of non-parenchymal cells in liver growth Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 13 425 431 10.1016/S1084952102001301 12468243 · DOI
  57. Margall-Ducos G Celton-Morizur S Couton D Brégerie O Desdouets C 2007 Liver tetraploidization is controlled by a new process of incomplete cytokinesis Journal of Cell Science 120 3633 3639 10.1242/jcs.016907 17895361 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Martin NC McCullough CT Bush PG Sharp L Hall AC Harrison DJ 2002 Functional analysis of mouse hepatocytes differing in DNA content: volume, receptor expression, and effect of IFNgamma Journal of Cellular Physiology 191 138 144 10.1002/jcp.10057 12064456 · DOI
  59. Mayer J Swoger J Ozga AJ Stein JV Sharpe J 2012 Quantitative measurements in 3-dimensional datasets of mouse lymph nodes resolve organ-wide functional dependencies Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2012 1 8 10.1155/2012/128431 PMC3461256 23049616 · DOI
  60. McCuskey RS 2008 The hepatic microvascular system in health and its response to toxicants Anatomical Record 291 661 671 10.1002/ar.20663 18484612 · DOI
  61. Megason SG Fraser SE 2007 Imaging in systems biology Cell 130 784 795 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.031 17803903 · DOI
  62. Miyaoka Y Miyajima A 2013 To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration Cell Division 8 10.1186/1747-1028-8-8 PMC3695844 23786799 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Morales-Navarrete H Segovia-Miranda F Klukowski P Meyer K Nonaka H Marsico G Chernykh M Kalaidzidis A Zerial M Kalaidzidis Y 2016 Data from: a versatile pipeline for the multi-scale digital reconstruction and quantitative analysis of 3D tissue architecture Dryad Digital Repository 10.5061/dryad.m67r6 PMC4764584 26673893 · DOI
  64. Mosaliganti K Janoos F Gelas F Noche F Obholzer F Machiraju F Megason F 2010 Anisotropic plate diffusion filtering for detection of cell membranes in 3d microscopy images 2010 7th Ieee International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 588 591 PMC3136121 21766060
  65. Mosaliganti KR Noche RR Xiong F Swinburne IA Megason SG 2012 ACME: automated cell morphology extractor for comprehensive reconstruction of cell membranes PLoS Computational Biology 8 e11214 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002780 PMC3516542 23236265 · DOI
  66. Nasse MJ Woehl JC 2010 Realistic modeling of the illumination point spread function in confocal scanning optical microscopy Journal of the Optical Society of America A 27 295 302 10.1364/JOSAA.27.000295 20126241 · DOI
  67. Nasse MJ Woehl JC Huant S 2007 High-resolution mapping of the three-dimensional point spread function in the near-focus region of a confocal microscope Applied Physics Letters 90 031106 10.1063/1.2431764 · DOI
  68. Nyengaard JR Flyvbjerg A Rasch R 1993 The impact of renal growth, regression and regrowth in experimental diabetes mellitus on number and size of proximal and distal tubular cells in the rat kidney Diabetologia 36 1126 1131 10.1007/BF00401056 8270126 · DOI
  69. O'Gorman L Sanderson AC Preston K 1985 A system for automated liver tissue image analysis: methods and results IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 32 696 706 10.1109/TBME.1985.325587 4054933 · DOI
  70. Oda M Yokomori H Han JY 2003 Regulatory mechanisms of hepatic microcirculation Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation 29 167 182 14724338
  71. Ohtani O Ohtani Y 2008 Lymph circulation in the liver Anatomical Record (Hoboken, N.J.: 2007) 291 643 652 10.1002/ar.20681 18484610 · DOI
  72. Pal NR Pal SK 1993 A review on image segmentation techniques Pattern Recognition 26 1277 1294 10.1016/0031-3203(93)90135-J · DOI
  73. Pecot T Singh S Caserta E Huang K Machiraju R Leone G 2012 Non parametric cell nuclei segmentation based on a tracking over depth from 3d fluorescence confocal images 9th Ieee International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (Isbi) 170 173
  74. Peng H Ruan Z Long F Simpson JH Myers EW 2010 V3D enables real-time 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of large-scale biological image data sets Nature Biotechnology 28 348 353 10.1038/nbt.1612 PMC2857929 20231818 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Powers DMW 2011 Evaluation: from precision, recall and f-factor to roc, informedne, markedness & correlation Journal of Machine Learning Technologies 2 37
  76. Preibisch S Saalfeld S Tomancak P 2009 Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions Bioinformatics 25 1463 1465 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp184 19346324 PMC2682522 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Rasch R Dørup J 1997 Quantitative morphology of the rat kidney during diabetes mellitus and insulin treatment Diabetologia 40 802 809 10.1007/s001250050752 9243101 · DOI
  78. Ray K 2015 Developmental biology: on the origin of liver regeneration Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 12 549 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.147 26323875 · DOI
  79. Saalfeld S Fetter R Cardona A Tomancak P 2012 Elastic volume reconstruction from series of ultra-thin microscopy sections Nature Methods 9 717 720 10.1038/nmeth.2072 22688414 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Sbalzarini IF 2013 Modeling and simulation of biological systems from image data BioEssays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 35 482 490 10.1002/bies.201200051 PMC3674526 23533152 · DOI
  81. Sivia DS 1996 Dealing with duff data MAXENT96 - Proceedings of the Maximum Entropy Conference
  82. Smith N Waters S Hunter P Clayton R 2011 The cardiac physiome: foundations and future prospects for mathematical modelling of the heart Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 104 1 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.12.006 21216338 · DOI
  83. Stegmaier J Otte JC Kobitski A Bartschat A Garcia A Nienhaus GU Strähle U Mikut R 2014 Fast segmentation of stained nuclei in terabyte-scale, time resolved 3D microscopy image stacks PloS One 9 e11214 10.1371/journal.pone.0090036 PMC3937404 24587204 · DOI
  84. Wisse E De Zanger RB Charels K Van Der Smissen P McCuskey RS 1985 The liver sieve: considerations concerning the structure and function of endothelial fenestrae, the sinusoidal wall and the space of disse Hepatology 5 683 692 10.1002/hep.1840050427 3926620 · DOI
  85. Wolberg G Zokai S 2000 Robust image registration using log-polar transform International Conference on Image Processing, Vol 1, Proceedings 493 496
  86. Xing YG Lawrence JB 1991 Preservation of specific RNA distribution within the chromatin-depleted nuclear substructure demonstrated by in situ hybridization coupled with biochemical fractionation The Journal of Cell Biology 112 1055 1063 10.1083/jcb.112.6.1055 1705562 PMC2288899 · DOI
  87. Zaret KS 2015 Regenerative biology: maintaining liver mass Nature 524 165 166 10.1038/nature15201 26245376 · DOI
  88. Zhao H Darzynkiewicz Z 2013 Biomarkers of cell senescence assessed by imaging cytometry Methods in Molecular Biology 965 83 92 10.1007/978-1-62703-239-1_5 23296652 PMC3541526 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morales-Navarrete, H., Segovia-Miranda, F., Klukowski, P., Meyer, K., Nonaka, H., Marsico, G., Chernykh, M., Kalaidzidis, A., Zerial, M., & Kalaidzidis, Y.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
  • Rohto Pharmaceutical (Japan) (JP)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Corresponding author
  • Zerial, Marino
  • Kalaidzidis, Yannis
Venue
eLife
Published
2015-12-17
Volume
4
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2200588194
Cited by
98
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
tissue structure, quantitative morphometry, image processing pipeline, liver tissue, hepatocyte zonation, liver sinusoids, bile canaliculi, cell shape analysis, lung tissue, kidney tissue, tissue organization
MeSH terms
Animals, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Liver, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Microscopy, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Optical Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review