Cited by 156Liver physiology and pathologyOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

To divide or not to divide: revisiting liver regeneration

Open access
Miyaoka, Yuichiro, Miyajima, Atsushi·2013·Cell Division

Abstract

The liver has a remarkable capacity to regenerate. Even with surgical removal (partial hepatectomy) of 70% of liver mass, the remnant tissue grows to recover the original mass and functions. Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy has been studied extensively since the 19th century, establishing the long-standing model that hepatocytes, which account for most of the liver weight, proliferate to recover the original mass of the liver. The basis of this model is the fact that almost all hepatocytes undergo S phase, as shown by the incorporation of radioactive nucleotides during liver regeneration. However, DNA replication does not necessarily indicate the execution of cell division, and a possible change in hepatocyte size is not considered in the model. In addition, as 15-30% of hepatocytes in adult liver are binuclear, the difference in nuclear number may affect the mode of cell division during regeneration. Thus, the traditional model seems to be oversimplified. Recently, we developed new techniques to investigate the process of liver regeneration, and revealed interesting features of hepatocytes. In this review, we first provide a historical overview of how the widely accepted model of liver regeneration was established and then discuss some overlooked observations together with our recent findings. Finally, we describe the revised model and perspectives on liver regeneration research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1747-1028-8-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Akt/mTORC1 pathway is a key mediator of cell growth in many cellular systems, including certain settings of liver regeneration.

    “However, The Akt/mTORC1 pathway is a key mediator of cell growth in many cellular systems, including certain settings of liver regeneration[55].”

    From Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: Triggers and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [55]

    In “Hepatocytes enlarge” (page unavailable), the paper says the Akt–mTOR axis regulates the size of various cell types and seems important for hepatocyte hypertrophy during liver regeneration. It discusses mTOR generally, however, and does not identify mTORC1 specifically as the mediator. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hyperplasia and hypertrophy do not equally affect all hepatocytes and all lobes after partial hepatectomy.

    “However, in the same study, Miyaoka and Miyajima note that the process of hyperplasia and hypertrophy does not equally affect all hepatocytes and all lobes.”

    From Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: Triggers and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [55]

    In the Introduction’s “A revised model of liver regeneration” (page unavailable), the paper says not all hepatocytes divide after partial hepatectomy, supporting unequal participation in hyperplasia. But Figure 5 says all hepatocytes enlarge, and the cited passages do not establish that hypertrophy or hyperplasia differs among the remaining lobes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Binucleated hepatocytes are commonly detected during liver regeneration, and their presence reflects ongoing mitotic activity not followed by cytokinesis.

    “In addition, binucleated hepatocytes are commonly detected during liver regeneration. Their presence reflects ongoing mitotic activity that is not followed by cytokinesis.”

    From Liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: Triggers and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [55]

    The section “Cell division of binuclear hepatocytes to produce mononuclear cells” confirms that binuclear hepatocytes are observed during regeneration. But it says their number decreases during regeneration and describes incomplete cytokinesis as a cause of binucleation during liver maturation, not as what their presence indicates during regeneration. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hepatocytes undergo not only hyperplasia but also hypertrophy during liver regeneration.

    “These data prove that hepatocytes undergo not only hyperplasia but also the hypertrophy, which during their proliferation is carried out by the pathway[55].”
  • After 70% hepatectomy, the number of hepatocytes in the remaining lobes increases 1.6 times and the mass of these lobes increases 2.4 times.

    “According to Miyaoka and Miyajima's calculations[55], the number of hepatocytes in the remaining lobes after 70% hepatectomy increases 1.6 times, and the mass of these lobes increases 2.4 times.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 122 · Cited by 156

Research works printed but not linked: 107

  1. Palmes D Spiegel HU Animal models of liver regeneration Biomaterials 2004 25 1601 1611 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00508-8 14697862 · DOI
  2. Alison MR Islam S Lim S Stem cells in liver regeneration, fibrosis and cancer: the good, the bad and the ugly J Pathol 2009 217 282 298 10.1002/path.2453 18991329 · DOI
  3. Si-Tayeb K Lemaigre FP Duncan SA Organogenesis and development of the liver Dev Cell 2010 18 175 189 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.01.011 20159590 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zaret KS Grompe M Generation and regeneration of cells of the liver and pancreas Science 2008 322 1490 1494 10.1126/science.1161431 19056973 PMC2641009 · DOI
  5. Tanaka M Itoh T Tanimizu N Miyajima A Liver stem/progenitor cells: their characteristics and regulatory mechanisms J Biochem 2011 149 231 239 10.1093/jb/mvr001 21217146 · DOI
  6. Court FG Wemyss-Holden SA Dennison AR Maddern GJ The mystery of liver regeneration Br J Surg 2002 89 1089 1095 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02166.x 12190672 · DOI
  7. Fausto N Liver regeneration J Hepatol 2000 32 19 31 10728791
  8. Michalopoulos GK DeFrances M Liver regeneration Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2005 93 101 134 15791946
  9. Brockes JP Kumar A Comparative aspects of animal regeneration Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2008 24 525 549 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175336 18598212 · DOI
  10. Milne LS The histology of liver tissue regeneration J Pathol Bacteriol 1909 13 127 160 10.1002/path.1700130121 · DOI
  11. Beams HW King RL The origin of binucleate and large mono nucleate cells in the liver of the rat Anat Rec 1942 83 281 297 10.1002/ar.1090830207 · DOI
  12. St Aubin PM Bucher NL A study of binucleate cell counts in resting and regenerating rat liver employing a mechanical method for the separation of liver cells Anat Rec 1952 112 797 809 10.1002/ar.1091120406 14924256 · DOI
  13. Jordan SW Electron Microscopy of Hepatic Regeneration Exp Mol Pathol 1964 86 183 200 14194319
  14. Stenger RJ Confer DB Hepatocellular ultrastructure during liver regeneration after subtotal hepatectomy Exp Mol Pathol 1966 5 455 474 10.1016/0014-4800(66)90026-8 5920447 · DOI
  15. Aterman K Electron microscopy of the rat liver cell after partial hepatectomy J Pathol Bacteriol 1961 82 367 369 10.1002/path.1700820215 13863078 · DOI
  16. Fisher ER Fisher B Ultrastructural Hepatic Changes Following Partial Hepatectomy and Portacaval Shunt in the Rat Lab Invest 1963 12 929 942 14063413
  17. Grisham JW A morphologic study of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis and cell proliferation in regenerating rat liver; autoradiography with thymidine-H3 Cancer Res 1962 22 842 849 13902009
  18. Bucher NL Swaffield MN The Rate of Incorporation of Labeled Thymidine into the Deoxyribonucleic Acid of Regenerating Rat Liver in Relation to the Amount of Liver Excised Cancer Res 1964 24 1611 1625 14234005
  19. Fabrikant JI The kinetics of cellular proliferation in regenerating liver J Cell Biol 1968 36 551 565 10.1083/jcb.36.3.551 5645547 PMC2107378 · DOI
  20. Bucher NL Swaffield MN Rate of incorporation of [6-14C]orotic acid into uridine 5′-triphosphate and cytidine 5′-triphosphate and nuclear ribonucleic acid in regenerating rat liver Biochim Biophys Acta 1965 108 551 567 10.1016/0005-2787(65)90052-3 5326539 · DOI
  21. Bucher NL Oakman NJ Thymidine triphosphate content of regenerating rat liver Biochim Biophys Acta 1969 186 13 20 10.1016/0005-2787(69)90485-7 4897211 · DOI
  22. Stocker E Pfeifer U [On the manner of proliferation of the liver parenchyma after partial hepatectomy. Autoradiography studies using 3H-thymidine] Naturwissenschaften 1965 52 663 5873906
  23. Fausto N Campbell JS Riehle KJ Liver regeneration Hepatology 2006 43 S45 S53 10.1002/hep.20969 16447274 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Duncan AW Dorrell C Grompe M Stem cells and liver regeneration Gastroenterology 2009 137 466 481 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.044 19470389 PMC3136245 · DOI
  25. Koller BH Hagemann LJ Doetschman T Hagaman JR Huang S Williams PJ First NL Maeda N Smithies O Germ-line transmission of a planned alteration made in a hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989 86 8927 8931 10.1073/pnas.86.22.8927 2573070 PMC298403 · DOI
  26. Schwartzberg PL Goff SP Robertson EJ Germ-line transmission of a c-abl mutation produced by targeted gene disruption in ES cells Science 1989 246 799 803 10.1126/science.2554496 2554496 · DOI
  27. Thompson S Clarke AR Pow AM Hooper ML Melton DW Germ line transmission and expression of a corrected HPRT gene produced by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells Cell 1989 56 313 321 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90905-7 2912572 · DOI
  28. Tan X Behari J Cieply B Michalopoulos GK Monga SP Conditional deletion of beta-catenin reveals its role in liver growth and regeneration Gastroenterology 2006 131 1561 1572 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.042 17101329 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Chen L Zeng Y Yang H Lee TD French SW Corrales FJ Garcia-Trevijano ER Avila MA Mato JM Lu SC Impaired liver regeneration in mice lacking methionine adenosyltransferase 1A FASEB J 2004 18 914 916 15033934
  30. Nakamura K Nonaka H Saito H Tanaka M Miyajima A Hepatocyte proliferation and tissue remodeling is impaired after liver injury in oncostatin M receptor knockout mice Hepatology 2004 39 635 644 10.1002/hep.20086 14999682 · DOI
  31. Beyer TA Xu W Teupser D Auf Dem Keller U Bugnon P Hildt E Thiery J Kan YW Werner S Impaired liver regeneration in Nrf2 knockout mice: role of ROS-mediated insulin/IGF-1 resistance EMBO J 2008 27 212 223 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601950 18059474 PMC2206132 · DOI
  32. Factor VM Seo D Ishikawa T Kaposi-Novak P Marquardt JU Andersen JB Conner EA Thorgeirsson SS Loss of c-Met disrupts gene expression program required for G2/M progression during liver regeneration in mice PLoS One 2010 5 e12739 10.1371/journal.pone.0012739 20862286 PMC2940888 · DOI
  33. Geschwind II Alfert M Schooley C Liver regeneration and hepatic polyploidy in the hypophysectomized rat Exp Cell Res 1958 15 232 235 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90080-6 13574177 · DOI
  34. Miyaoka Y Ebato K Kato H Arakawa S Shimizu S Miyajima A Hypertrophy and unconventional cell division of hepatocytes underlie liver regeneration Curr Biol 2012 22 1166 1175 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.016 22658593 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Herweijer H Wolff JA Gene therapy progress and prospects: hydrodynamic gene delivery Gene Ther 2007 14 99 107 17167496
  36. Wooddell CI Reppen T Wolff JA Herweijer H Sustained liver-specific transgene expression from the albumin promoter in mice following hydrodynamic plasmid DNA delivery J Gene Med 2008 10 551 563 18330848
  37. Mitchell C Nivison M Jackson LF Fox R Lee DC Campbell JS Fausto N Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor links hepatocyte priming with cell cycle progression during liver regeneration J Biol Chem 2005 280 2562 2568 15536070
  38. Conlon I Raff M Size control in animal development Cell 1999 96 235 244 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80563-2 9988218 · DOI
  39. Su AI Guidotti LG Pezacki JP Chisari FV Schultz PG Gene expression during the priming phase of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in mice Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002 99 11181 11186 10.1073/pnas.122359899 12177410 PMC123230 · DOI
  40. Haga S Ogawa W Inoue H Terui K Ogino T Igarashi R Takeda K Akira S Enosawa S Furukawa H Compensatory recovery of liver mass by Akt-mediated hepatocellular hypertrophy in liver-specific STAT3-deficient mice J Hepatol 2005 43 799 807 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.03.027 16083985 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Minamishima YA Nakayama K Recovery of liver mass without proliferation of hepatocytes after partial hepatectomy in Skp2-deficient mice Cancer Res 2002 62 995 999 11861371
  42. Wirth KG Wutz G Kudo NR Desdouets C Zetterberg A Taghybeeglu S Seznec J Ducos GM Ricci R Firnberg N Separase: a universal trigger for sister chromatid disjunction but not chromosome cycle progression J Cell Biol 2006 172 847 860 10.1083/jcb.200506119 16533945 PMC2063729 · DOI
  43. Diril MK Ratnacaram CK Padmakumar VC Du T Wasser M Coppola V Tessarollo L Kaldis P Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is essential for cell division and suppression of DNA re-replication but not for liver regeneration Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 109 3826 3831 10.1073/pnas.1115201109 22355113 PMC3309725 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Nagy P Teramoto T Factor VM Sanchez A Schnur J Paku S Thorgeirsson SS Reconstitution of liver mass via cellular hypertrophy in the rat Hepatology 2001 33 339 345 10.1053/jhep.2001.21326 11172335 · DOI
  45. Trotter NL A Fine Structure Study of Lipid in Mouse Liver Regenerating after Partial Hepatectomy J Cell Biol 1964 21 233 244 10.1083/jcb.21.2.233 14153484 PMC2106433 · DOI
  46. Trotter NL Electron-opaque, lipid-containing bodies in mouse liver at early intervals after partial hepatectomy and sham operation J Cell Biol 1965 25 Suppl 41 52 5840801
  47. Murray AB Strecker W Silz S Ultrastructural changes in rat hepatocytes after partial hepatectomy, and comparison with biochemical results J Cell Sci 1981 50 433 448 7320075
  48. Kozma SC Thomas G Regulation of cell size in growth, development and human disease: PI3K, PKB and S6K Bioessays 2002 24 65 71 10.1002/bies.10031 11782951 · DOI
  49. Kim S Li Q Dang CV Lee LA Induction of ribosomal genes and hepatocyte hypertrophy by adenovirus-mediated expression of c-Myc in vivo Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000 97 11198 11202 10.1073/pnas.200372597 11005843 PMC17177 · DOI
  50. Beer S Zetterberg A Ihrie RA McTaggart RA Yang Q Bradon N Arvanitis C Attardi LD Feng S Ruebner B Developmental context determines latency of MYC-induced tumorigenesis PLoS Biol 2004 2 e332 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020332 15455033 PMC519000 · DOI
  51. Ruvinsky I Meyuhas O Ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation: from protein synthesis to cell size Trends Biochem Sci 2006 31 342 348 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.04.003 16679021 · DOI
  52. Jorgensen P Tyers M How cells coordinate growth and division Curr Biol 2004 14 R1014 R1027 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.027 15589139 · DOI
  53. Gentric G Desdouets C Celton-Morizur S Hepatocytes polyploidization and cell cycle control in liver physiopathology Int J Hepatol 2012 2012 282430 23150829 PMC3485502
  54. Satyanarayana A Wiemann SU Buer J Lauber J Dittmar KEJ Wustefeld T Blasco MA Manns MP Rudolph KL Telomere shortening impairs organ regeneration by inhibiting cell cycle re-entry of a subpopulation of cells EMBO J 2003 22 4003 4013 10.1093/emboj/cdg367 12881434 PMC169040 · DOI
  55. Enserink JM Kolodner RD An overview of Cdk1-controlled targets and processes Cell Div 2010 5 11 10.1186/1747-1028-5-11 20465793 PMC2876151 · DOI
  56. Bloom J Cross FR Multiple levels of cyclin specificity in cell-cycle control Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007 8 149 160 10.1038/nrm2105 17245415 · DOI
  57. Norbury C Blow J Nurse P Regulatory phosphorylation of the p34cdc2 protein kinase in vertebrates EMBO J 1991 10 3321 3329 1655417 PMC453058
  58. Lee HO Davidson JM Duronio RJ Endoreplication: polyploidy with purpose Genes Dev 2009 23 2461 2477 10.1101/gad.1829209 19884253 PMC2779750 · DOI
  59. Harrison MF Percentage of binucleate cells in the livers of adult rats Nature 1953 171 611 10.1038/171611a0 13054653 · DOI
  60. Wheatley DN Binucleation in mammalian liver. Studies on the control of cytokinesis in vivo Exp Cell Res 1972 74 455 465 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90401-6 4343021 · DOI
  61. Gerlyng P Abyholm A Grotmol T Erikstein B Huitfeldt HS Stokke T Seglen PO Binucleation and polyploidization patterns in developmental and regenerative rat liver growth Cell Prolif 1993 26 557 565 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1993.tb00033.x 9116122 · DOI
  62. Yu JT Foster RG Dean DC Transcriptional repression by RB-E2F and regulation of anchorage-independent survival Mol Cell Biol 2001 21 3325 3335 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3325-3335.2001 11313458 PMC100254 · DOI
  63. Brennan P Babbage JW Burgering BM Groner B Reif K Cantrell DA Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase couples the interleukin-2 receptor to the cell cycle regulator E2F Immunity 1997 7 679 689 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80388-X 9390691 · DOI
  64. Ruchaud S Carmena M Earnshaw WC Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007 8 798 812 10.1038/nrm2257 17848966 · DOI
  65. Duncan AW Taylor MH Hickey RD Hanlon Newell AE Lenzi ML Olson SB Finegold MJ Grompe M The ploidy conveyor of mature hepatocytes as a source of genetic variation Nature 2010 467 707 710 10.1038/nature09414 20861837 PMC2967727 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Thornburg K Jonker S O'Tierney P Chattergoon N Louey S Faber J Giraud G Regulation of the cardiomyocyte population in the developing heart Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2011 106 289 299 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.11.010 21147149 PMC3110537 · DOI
  67. Liu Z Yue S Chen X Kubin T Braun T Regulation of cardiomyocyte polyploidy and multinucleation by CyclinG1 Circ Res 2010 106 1498 1506 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.211888 20360255 · DOI
  68. Sedmera D Thompson RP Myocyte proliferation in the developing heart Dev Dyn 2011 240 1322 1334 10.1002/dvdy.22650 21538685 PMC3271704 · DOI
  69. Bersell K Arab S Haring B Kuhn B Neuregulin1/ErbB4 signaling induces cardiomyocyte proliferation and repair of heart injury Cell 2009 138 257 270 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.060 19632177 · DOI
  70. Duncan AW Hanlon Newell AE Smith L Wilson EM Olson SB Thayer MJ Strom SC Grompe M Frequent aneuploidy among normal human hepatocytes Gastroenterology 2012 142 25 28 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.029 22057114 PMC3244538 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Lu P Prost S Caldwell H Tugwood JD Betton GR Harrison DJ Microarray analysis of gene expression of mouse hepatocytes of different ploidy Mamm Genome 2007 18 617 626 10.1007/s00335-007-9048-y 17726633 · DOI
  72. Anatskaya OV Vinogradov AE Genome multiplication as adaptation to tissue survival: evidence from gene expression in mammalian heart and liver Genomics 2007 89 70 80 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.08.014 17029690 · DOI
  73. Martin NC McCullough CT Bush PG Sharp L Hall AC Harrison DJ Functional analysis of mouse hepatocytes differing in DNA content: volume, receptor expression, and effect of IFNgamma J Cell Physiol 2002 191 138 144 10.1002/jcp.10057 12064456 · DOI
  74. Sigal SH Rajvanshi P Gorla GR Sokhi RP Saxena R Gebhard DR Jr Reid LM Gupta S Partial hepatectomy-induced polyploidy attenuates hepatocyte replication and activates cell aging events Am J Physiol 1999 276 G1260 G1272 10330018
  75. Fankhauser G Maintenance of normal structure in heteroploid salamander larvae, through compensation of changes in cell size by adjustment of cell number and cell shape J Exp Zool 1945 100 445 455 10.1002/jez.1401000310 21010861 · DOI
  76. Henery CC Bard JB Kaufman MH Tetraploidy in mice, embryonic cell number, and the grain of the developmental map Dev Biol 1992 152 233 241 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90131-Y 1644218 · DOI
  77. Holland AJ Cleveland DW Losing balance: the origin and impact of aneuploidy in cancer EMBO Rep 2012 13 501 514 10.1038/embor.2012.55 22565320 PMC3367240 · DOI
  78. Pfau SJ Amon A Chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in cancer: from yeast to man EMBO Rep 2012 13 515 527 10.1038/embor.2012.65 22614003 PMC3367249 · DOI
  79. Lazzerini Denchi E Celli G de Lange T Hepatocytes with extensive telomere deprotection and fusion remain viable and regenerate liver mass through endoreduplication Genes Dev 2006 20 2648 2653 10.1101/gad.1453606 17015429 PMC1578691 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Raff MC Size control: the regulation of cell numbers in animal development Cell 1996 86 173 175 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80087-2 8706120 · DOI
  81. Savage VM Allen AP Brown JH Gillooly JF Herman AB Woodruff WH West GB Scaling of number, size, and metabolic rate of cells with body size in mammals Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 104 4718 4723 10.1073/pnas.0611235104 17360590 PMC1838666 · DOI
  82. Liu B Preisig PA Compensatory renal hypertrophy is mediated by a cell cycle-dependent mechanism Kidney Int 2002 62 1650 1658 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00620.x 12371965 · DOI
  83. Harvey PA Leinwand LA The cell biology of disease: cellular mechanisms of cardiomyopathy J Cell Biol 2011 194 355 365 10.1083/jcb.201101100 21825071 PMC3153638 · DOI
  84. Watkins H Ashrafian H Redwood C Inherited cardiomyopathies N Engl J Med 2011 364 1643 1656 10.1056/NEJMra0902923 21524215 · DOI
  85. Dong J Feldmann G Huang J Wu S Zhang N Comerford SA Gayyed MF Anders RA Maitra A Pan D Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals Cell 2007 130 1120 1133 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019 17889654 PMC2666353 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Song H Mak KK Topol L Yun K Hu J Garrett L Chen Y Park O Chang J Simpson RM Mammalian Mst1 and Mst2 kinases play essential roles in organ size control and tumor suppression Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010 107 1431 1436 10.1073/pnas.0911409107 20080598 PMC2824397 · DOI
  87. Tumaneng K Russell RC Guan KL Organ size control by Hippo and TOR pathways Curr Biol 2012 22 R368 R379 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.003 22575479 PMC3601681 · DOI
  88. Pan D Hippo signaling in organ size control Genes Dev 2007 21 886 897 10.1101/gad.1536007 17437995 · DOI
  89. Tordjmann T Hippo signalling: liver size regulation and beyond Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2011 35 344 346 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.01.012 21377440 · DOI
  90. Tumaneng K Schlegelmilch K Russell RC Yimlamai D Basnet H Mahadevan N Fitamant J Bardeesy N Camargo FD Guan KL YAP mediates crosstalk between the Hippo and PI(3)K-TOR pathways by suppressing PTEN via miR-29 Nat Cell Biol 2012 14 1322 1329 10.1038/ncb2615 23143395 PMC4019071 · DOI · Paper page
  91. Wang HH Lautt WW Evidence of nitric oxide, a flow-dependent factor, being a trigger of liver regeneration in rats Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1998 76 1072 1079 10.1139/y98-128 10326828 · DOI
  92. Schoen JM Wang HH Minuk GY Lautt WW Shear stress-induced nitric oxide release triggers the liver regeneration cascade Nitric Oxide 2001 5 453 464 10.1006/niox.2001.0373 11587560 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Macedo MP Lautt WW Shear-induced modulation of vasoconstriction in the hepatic artery and portal vein by nitric oxide Am J Physiol 1998 274 G253 G260 9486177
  94. Sato Y Tsukada K Hatakeyama K Role of shear stress and immune responses in liver regeneration after a partial hepatectomy Surg Today 1999 29 1 9 10.1007/BF02482962 9934824 · DOI
  95. Niiya T Murakami M Aoki T Murai N Shimizu Y Kusano M Immediate increase of portal pressure, reflecting sinusoidal shear stress, induced liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1999 6 275 280 10.1007/s005340050118 10526063 · DOI · Paper page
  96. Huang W Ma K Zhang J Qatanani M Cuvillier J Liu J Dong B Huang X Moore DD Nuclear receptor-dependent bile acid signaling is required for normal liver regeneration Science 2006 312 233 236 10.1126/science.1121435 16614213 · DOI · Paper page
  97. Meng Z Liu N Fu X Wang X Wang YD Chen WD Zhang L Forman BM Huang W Insufficient bile acid signaling impairs liver repair in CYP27(−/−) mice J Hepatol 2011 55 885 895 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.12.037 21334403 · DOI
  98. Holecek M Nutritional modulation of liver regeneration by carbohydrates, lipids, and amino acids: a review Nutrition 1999 15 784 788 10.1016/S0899-9007(99)00158-6 10501293 · DOI
  99. Simek J Chmelar V Melka J Pazderka Charvat Z Influence of protracted infusion of glucose and insulin on the composition and regeneration activity of liver after partial hepatectomy in rats Nature 1967 213 910 911 10.1038/213910a0 6030054 · DOI
  100. Simek J Melka J Pospisil M Neradilkova M Effect of protracted glucose infusion on the development of early biochemical changes and initiation of regeneration in rat liver after partial hepatectomy Physiol Bohemoslov 1965 14 366 370 5836366
  101. Weymann A Hartman E Gazit V Wang C Glauber M Turmelle Y Rudnick DA p21 is required for dextrose-mediated inhibition of mouse liver regeneration Hepatology 2009 50 207 215 10.1002/hep.22979 19441104 PMC2705473 · DOI
  102. Carr BI Hayashi I Branum EL Moses HL Inhibition of DNA synthesis in rat hepatocytes by platelet-derived type beta transforming growth factor Cancer Res 1986 46 2330 2334 3008986
  103. Apte U Gkretsi V Bowen WC Mars WM Luo JH Donthamsetty S Orr A Monga SP Wu C Michalopoulos GK Enhanced liver regeneration following changes induced by hepatocyte-specific genetic ablation of integrin-linked kinase Hepatology 2009 50 844 851 10.1002/hep.23059 19575460 PMC2914599 · DOI
  104. Liu B Paranjpe S Bowen WC Bell AW Luo JH Yu YP Mars WM Michalopoulos GK Investigation of the role of glypican 3 in liver regeneration and hepatocyte proliferation Am J Pathol 2009 175 717 724 10.2353/ajpath.2009.081129 19574424 PMC2716967 · DOI
  105. Yamamoto Y Ono T Dhar DK Yamanoi A Tachibana M Tanaka T Nagasue N Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) during liver regeneration in rats J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008 23 930 937 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05370.x 18565023 · DOI
  106. Nygard IE Mortensen KE Hedegaard J Conley LN Kalstad T Bendixen C Revhaug A The genetic regulation of the terminating phase of liver regeneration Comp Hepatol 2012 11 3 10.1186/1476-5926-11-3 23164283 PMC3558440 · DOI
  107. Rychtrmoc D Hubalkova L Viskova A Libra A Buncek M Cervinkova Z Transcriptome temporal and functional analysis of liver regeneration termination Physiol Res 2012 61 Suppl 2 S77 S92 23130906

Authors
Miyaoka, Y., & Miyajima, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Miyajima, Atsushi
Venue
Cell Division
Published
2013
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
8
ISSN
1747-1028 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166192049
Cited by
156
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cell Division (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (CREST)
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (CREST)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (CREST)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
liver regeneration, partial hepatectomy, hepatocyte proliferation, binuclear hepatocytes, hepatocyte size, DNA replication, nuclear number

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review