Cited by 69Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Eco-HAB as a fully automated and ecologically relevant assessment of social impairments in mouse models of autism

Open access
Puścian, Alicja, Łęski, Szymon, Kasprowicz, Grzegorz, Winiarski, Maciej, Borowska, Joanna, Nikolaev, Tomasz, Boguszewski, Paweł M, Lipp, Hans-Peter +1 more·2016·eLife

Abstract

Eco-HAB is an open source, RFID-based system for automated measurement and analysis of social preference and in-cohort sociability in mice. The system closely follows murine ethology. It requires no contact between a human experimenter and tested animals, overcoming the confounding factors that lead to irreproducible assessment of murine social behavior between laboratories. In Eco-HAB, group-housed animals live in a spacious, four-compartment apparatus with shadowed areas and narrow tunnels, resembling natural burrows. Eco-HAB allows for assessment of the tendency of mice to voluntarily spend time together in ethologically relevant mouse group sizes. Custom-made software for automated tracking, data extraction, and analysis enables quick evaluation of social impairments. The developed protocols and standardized behavioral measures demonstrate high replicability. Unlike classic three-chambered sociability tests, Eco-HAB provides measurements of spontaneous, ecologically relevant social behaviors in group-housed animals. Results are obtained faster, with less manpower, and without confounding factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.19532

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the laboratory, mice are more often than rats kept in large groups (more than 10 animals), which facilitates studying high-order social behaviors such as emergence of social networks.

    “Finally, in the laboratory, mice are more often than rats kept in large groups (ie, more than 10 animals), which facilitates studying high-order social behaviors which cannot be reduced to interactions within dyads, for example, emergence of social networks.1,2,72”
  • Some strains of mice are more 'social' than others; some tend to group together more and/or engage in more social interactions.

    “There is compelling evidence that some strains are more”
  • Mice are usually harder to habituate, but easier to house in big groups and complex environments.

    “Mice are usually harder to habituate, but on the other hand easier to house in big groups and complex environments.1,51”
  • Automated systems for measuring social interactions in group-living animals are becoming more and more popular.

    “Such systems are becoming more and more popular.1,2,179”
  • The Eco-HAB system offers an easy and fast way of investigating between-strain and between-genotype differences in sociability in mice.

    “The system, which is equipped with software for data acquisition and analysis, offers the easy and fast way of investigating between-strain and between-genotype differences in sociability in mice.1”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nature Challenges in irreproducible research Nature News and Comment http://www.nature.com/news/reproducibility-1.17552 December 14, 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puścian, A., Łęski, S., Kasprowicz, G., Winiarski, M., Borowska, J., Nikolaev, T., Boguszewski, P. M., Lipp, H.-P., & Knapska, E.
Affiliations
  • Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego (PL)
  • Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Knapska, Ewelina
Venue
eLife
Published
2016-10-12
Volume
5
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2530742534
Cited by
69
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Swiss Contribution to the enlarged European Union (PSPB-210)
  • Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2013/08/W/NZ4/00691)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
mouse models of autism, social behavior assessment, social preferences, sociability, RFID tracking, automated behavioral analysis, group-housed mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Social Behavior Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Automation, Laboratory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review