Precise control of neural activity using dynamically optimized electrical stimulation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Neural implants have the potential to restore lost sensory function by electrically evoking the complex naturalistic activity patterns of neural populations. However, it can be difficult to predict and control evoked neural responses to simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation due to nonlinearity of the responses. We present a solution to this problem and demonstrate its utility in the context of a bidirectional retinal implant for restoring vision. A dynamically optimized stimulation approach encodes incoming visual stimuli into a rapid, greedily chosen, temporally dithered and spatially multiplexed sequence of simple stimulation patterns. Stimuli are selected to optimize the reconstruction of the visual stimulus from the evoked responses. Temporal dithering exploits the slow time scales of downstream neural processing, and spatial multiplexing exploits the independence of responses generated by distant electrodes. The approach was evaluated using an experimental laboratory prototype of a retinal implant: large-scale, high-resolution multi-electrode stimulation and recording of macaque and rat retinal ganglion cells ex vivo. The dynamically optimized stimulation approach substantially enhanced performance compared to existing approaches based on static mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude. The modular framework enabled parallel extensions to naturalistic viewing conditions, incorporation of perceptual similarity measures, and efficient implementation for an implantable device. A direct closed-loop test of the approach supported its potential use in vision restoration.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper presents a dynamically optimized electrical stimulation framework that encodes visual stimuli into greedily selected, temporally dithered, and spatially multiplexed single-electrode stimulation patterns to better reconstruct neural activity for retinal implants. In ex vivo macaque and rat retina, this approach substantially outperformed static pixel-wise mapping and approached the performance limit of the single-electrode interface.
Key findings
- Greedy temporal dithering produced more accurate visual stimulus reconstruction than static pixel-wise mapping approximating existing implants, likely by differentially activating ON and OFF RGCs over space.
- The greedy algorithm was nearly optimal for the single-electrode dictionary: the performance gap was <10%, whereas the gap to “perfect control” with independent cell activation was >40%.
- Spatial multiplexing was supported by a spatial exclusion radius: activation probability changed <5% in threshold for a secondary electrode 200 µm away.
- Restricting the dictionary to the most frequently used electrodes reduced reconstruction error by <5% even when up to 50% of electrodes were removed; in naturalistic simulations, fixational eye movements reduced the number of required saccades by ~4× for the same final reconstruction error.
Methods
- Design: framed stimulation as an optimization problem with a linear reconstruction objective, a dictionary of empirically calibrated single-electrode responses, and a greedy temporal dithering algorithm with spatial multiplexing.
- Data/sample: ex vivo macaque and rat retina recorded and stimulated with a 512-electrode array at 60 μm spacing; macaque analysis focused on ON/OFF parasol cells, rat validation on putative ON/OFF brisk transient cells. Single-electrode calibration used 512 electrodes individually at 40 amplitudes (0.1–4 µA), 27 times each.
- Analysis: compared greedy temporal dithering against static pixel-wise mapping, approximate joint optimization, and perfect-control bounds; tested spatial exclusion radius, electrode subsampling, naturalistic eye-movement simulations, and SSIM-based perceptual optimization.
Limitations
- Stated: the approach assumes slow downstream visual integration over tens of milliseconds, linear reconstruction of the visual image, and independence of responses from interleaved and distant electrodes; the linear reconstruction assumption is “almost certainly wrong in detail.”
- Stated: closed-loop evoked-response reconstructions were less accurate than calibrated-response reconstructions, attributed to possible ex vivo non-stationarity and/or failures of independence; validation at shorter, implant-relevant stimulation intervals requires better spike sorting.
- Stated and evident: the work is ex vivo in macaque and rat retina, not a chronic human implant; translational barriers include surgical stability, response non-stationarity, inferring receptive fields/cell types in blind retina, degeneration-related spontaneous activity, and testing in central retina. Evident: perceptual outcomes and patient feedback were not measured, and real-time SSIM optimization was not yet demonstrated.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The dynamically optimized stimulation approach substantially enhanced performance compared to existing approaches based on static mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude.
“The dynamically optimized stimulation approach substantially enhanced performance compared to existing approaches based on static mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“The method produced substantial improvements in stimulus reconstruction compared to existing methods, by appropriately activating ON and OFF RGCs over space.”
- Also stated in: § Greedy temporal dithering outperforms existing static methods · hedged
“Even using this generous upper bound, static pixel-wise mapping resulted in significantly less accurate reconstruction of the target image (Figure 3D, H), likely due to coactivation of overlapping ON and OFF cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Findingcitation
Many electrical stimuli simultaneously activated two or more cells, often due to axonal stimulation.
“In general, even though some electrical stimuli selectively activated one cell, many stimuli simultaneously activated two or more cells, often due to axonal stimulation (Figure 1C; Grosberg et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grosberg et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Examination of many electrode pairs over a range of distances and multiple cells revealed a systematic decrease of the interaction between stimulating electrodes as a function of distance.
“Examination of many electrode pairs over a range of distances and multiple cells (Figure 5B) revealed a systematic decrease of the interaction between stimulating electrodes as a function of distance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The reconstruction performance benefited from differential activation of ON and OFF cells over space in a way that reflected the spatial distribution of intensities in each target image.
“Importantly, the reconstruction performance benefited from differential activation of ON and OFF cells over space in a way that reflected the spatial distribution of intensities in each target image (Figure 4E, F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A minimal (<5%) increase in reconstruction error was observed if the number of available electrodes was reduced by up to 50%.
“However, a minimal (<5%) increase in reconstruction error was observed if the number of available electrodes was reduced by up to 50% (Figure 6B–F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Reconstructions using evoked RGC responses were less accurate than reconstructions based on calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation.
“However, these reconstructions were less accurate than the reconstructions based on the calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation (which were used to compute the temporal dithering stimulation sequence during the experiment).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The reconstruction error obtained using the RGC responses evoked by the stimulation sequence was higher than the error obtained using calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation.
“Second, the reconstruction error obtained using the RGC responses evoked by the stimulation sequence was higher than the error obtained using calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation (Figure 4G, bottom), presumably reflecting non-stationarity in the ex vivo recordings and/or failures of independence due to temporal dithering (Figure 4G, see Discussion).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The reconstructed visual scene was smoother and more accurate (lower reconstruction error) when fixational eye movements were simulated along with saccades.
“Interestingly, the reconstructed visual scene was smoother and more accurate (lower reconstruction error) when fixational eye movements were simulated along with saccades (Figure 7C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These reconstructions reached asymptotic quality with 225 ± 29 stimulations.
“These reconstructions reached asymptotic quality with 225 ± 29 stimulations (not shown), a significantly smaller number than in tests obtained with macaque retina (Figure 3G), likely in part because of the smaller number of cells in the rat recordings (see Discussion).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Reconstructions using evoked RGC responses captured much of the spatial structure in each target image.
“The reconstructions using these evoked RGC responses captured much of the spatial structure in each target image.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The performance gap between the greedy algorithm and the optimal algorithm was low (<10%) across multiple target images.
“Across multiple target images, the gap was low (<10%, ‘optimal algorithm’ in Figure 3E, H), suggesting that the approximate nature of the greedy algorithm is not a substantial source of error in the present conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The reconstruction error obtained using calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation was higher than the error obtained under an assumption of 'perfect control'.
“First, the reconstruction error obtained using calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation was higher than the error obtained under an assumption of ‘perfect control’ (i.e. that all recorded cells can be activated independently), reflecting the limitations of single-electrode stimulation (Figure 4G, top), as shown earlier (Figure 3H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
High-amplitude stimuli tended to evoke spikes in cells with receptive fields off the electrode array via their axons.
“Also, high-amplitude stimuli tended to evoke spikes in cells with receptive fields off the electrode array via their axons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The reconstructions obtained with the evoked RGC responses captured much of the spatial structure in each target image.
“The reconstructions obtained with the evoked RGC responses captured much of the spatial structure in each target image (Figure 4A–D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The spatial structure of reconstructions using calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation and the RGC responses evoked by the stimulation sequence were similar.
“Notably, the spatial structure of reconstructions using the calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation (‘calibrated’ in Figure 4, similar to Figures 2 and 3) and the RGC responses evoked by the stimulation sequence (‘evoked’ in Figure 4) were similar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SSIM optimization produced higher-quality reconstructions when the number of electrical stimuli was limited.
“However, SSIM optimization produced higher-quality reconstructions when the number of electrical stimuli was limited (Figure 8C), a constraint that may be relevant with short visual integration times or low power limits in an implant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the same final reconstruction error, a ~4× reduction in the number of required saccades and hence the number of required electrical stimuli was observed in the presence of fixational eye movements.
“Specifically, for the same final reconstruction error, a ~4× reduction in the number of required saccades and hence the number of required electrical stimuli was observed in the presence of fixational eye movements (Figure 7D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SSIM and MSE metrics produced similar reconstructions when the number of electrical stimulation patterns was unlimited.
“The SSIM and MSE metrics produced similar reconstructions when the number of electrical stimulation patterns was unlimited (Figure 8B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The approach frequently exploits non-selective activation, in order to evoke desired spiking activity in fewer time steps.
“In fact, the approach frequently exploits non-selective activation, in order to evoke desired spiking activity in fewer time steps (Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
- Findingown data
The assembled visual scene closely matched the target, capturing many of its fine details.
“The assembled visual scene closely matched the target, capturing many of its fine details (Figure 7C, Figure 7—video 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing approach outperforms existing approaches.
“The greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing approach outperforms existing approaches (Figures 2—5) and enables efficient neural interface development (Figure 6), potentially incorporating naturalistic viewing with eye movements (Figure 7) and/or perceptual similarity metrics (Figure 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
- Findingown data
On average, the activation probability of a cell in response to single-electrode stimulation was affected relatively little (<5% fractional change in threshold) for a secondary electrode 200μm away.
“On average, the activation probability of a cell in response to single-electrode stimulation was affected relatively little (<5% fractional change in threshold) for a secondary electrode 200µm away.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The greedy temporal dithering algorithm chooses electrodes in a spatially non-uniform manner over the array.
“Because the greedy temporal dithering algorithm chooses electrodes in a spatially non-uniform manner over the array (Figure 6A), restricting stimulation to a more frequently chosen subset of electrodes could enhance efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The increase in reconstruction error with electrode subsampling was not due to the greedy nature of stimulation, because a lower bound computed for an optimal algorithm showed similar behavior.
“Note that this increase was not due to the greedy nature of stimulation, because a lower bound computed for an optimal algorithm showed similar behavior (Figure 6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The performance gap between a single-electrode dictionary and perfect control was substantial (>40%) across multiple targets.
“Across multiple targets, this gap was substantial (>40%, ‘perfect control’ in Figure 3F, H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
During the stimulation sequence, the reconstructed image slowly built up to a spatially smooth version of the target image.
“During the stimulation sequence, the reconstructed image slowly built up to a spatially smooth version of the target image (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The improvement of dynamic optimization over static methods is due to appropriately activating ON and OFF RGCs over space.
“The method produced substantial improvements in stimulus reconstruction compared to existing methods, by appropriately activating ON and OFF RGCs over space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The ex vivo lab prototype provides reliable experimental access to complete populations of ON and OFF parasol cell types in macaque retina.
“These data provide reliable experimental access to complete populations of ON and OFF parasol cell types in macaque retina, so these two cell types are the focus of the empirical analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Epiretinal implants electrically activate retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) that have survived degeneration, causing them to send artificial visual signals to the brain.
“Epiretinal implants electrically activate retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) that have survived degeneration, causing them to send artificial visual signals to the brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
A direct closed-loop test of the approach supported its potential use in vision restoration.
“A direct closed-loop test of the approach supported its potential use in vision restoration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Spatial multiplexing of stimuli outside a spatial exclusion radius is a practical strategy for high-throughput stimulation with temporal dithering.
“This suggests that spatial multiplexing of stimuli outside a spatial exclusion radius is a practical strategy for high-throughput stimulation with temporal dithering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The static pixel-wise mapping simulation provides a generous upper bound to the performance of existing retinal implants because it uses actual response probabilities to optimize each sigmoidal function rather than relying on limited patient feedback.
“This approach provides a generous upper bound to the performance of existing implants, because it uses actual response probabilities to optimize each sigmoidal function rather than relying on much more limited patient feedback, as is the case in existing retinal implants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The stimulus reconstruction filter approximation matches an optimal linear decoder only if the receptive fields of the cells are orthogonal.
“Note that because the stimulus reconstruction filter is proportional to the receptive field, this approximation matches an optimal linear decoder only if the receptive fields of the cells are orthogonal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Restricting stimulation to a more frequently chosen subset of electrodes could enhance efficiency.
“Because the greedy temporal dithering algorithm chooses electrodes in a spatially non-uniform manner over the array (Figure 6A), restricting stimulation to a more frequently chosen subset of electrodes could enhance efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Two electrodes more than 200μm apart were unlikely to substantially influence the activation probability of the same cell(s).
“Thus, two electrodes more than this distance apart were unlikely to substantially influence the activation probability of the same cell(s).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Such a reduction in the set of stimulated electrodes could lead to reduced memory access and power consumption, with little loss in performance.
“Such a reduction in the set of stimulated electrodes could lead to reduced memory access and power consumption, with little loss in performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The physiological similarities between human and macaque retina, including their responses to electrical stimulation, suggest that the benefits of the present stimulation approach could translate from the ex vivo lab prototype with healthy macaque retina to an in vivo implant in the degenerated human retina.
“The physiological similarities between human and macaque retina (Cowan et al., 2019; Kling et al., 2020; Soto et al., 2020; Rodieck, 1998), including their responses to electrical stimulation (Madugula et al., 2022), suggest that the benefits of the present stimulation approach could translate from the ex vivo lab prototype with healthy macaque retina to an in vivo implant in the degenerated human”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
More accurate image reconstruction is possible with fixational eye movements.
“Hence, the performance of greedy temporal dithering translates to natural viewing conditions and reveals that more accurate image reconstruction is possible with fixational eye movements (Wu et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wu et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A single-electrode stimulus generally cannot create a pattern of activity across the RGC population that accurately encodes a visual image.
“Because a single-electrode stimulus generally cannot create a pattern of activity across the RGC population that accurately encodes a visual image, multiple stimuli must be combined, while also avoiding the nonlinear interactions mentioned above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The approach can effectively exploit non-selective activation.
“Second, the approach can effectively exploit non-selective activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
- Interpretationreasoning
The hardware requirements of the proposed closed-loop procedure are less stringent than those of a real-time closed-loop system.
“First, the hardware requirements of the proposed closed-loop procedure – calibration of single-electrode stimuli followed by dynamically optimized stimulation for encoding visual scenes – are less stringent than those of a real-time closed-loop system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing approach enables efficient neural interface development.
“The greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing approach outperforms existing approaches (Figures 2—5) and enables efficient neural interface development (Figure 6), potentially incorporating naturalistic viewing with eye movements (Figure 7) and/or perceptual similarity metrics (Figure 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.
- Interpretationown data
The choice of reconstruction error metric may not be important for an implant that can stimulate at high rates.
“This suggests that the choice of reconstruction error metric may not be important for an implant that can stimulate at high rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The approximate nature of the greedy algorithm is not a substantial source of error in the present conditions.
“Across multiple target images, the gap was low (<10%, ‘optimal algorithm’ in Figure 3E, H), suggesting that the approximate nature of the greedy algorithm is not a substantial source of error in the present conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Electrical stimulation which approximates naturalistic RGC responses is important in comparison with static pixel-wise approaches used in existing implants.
“This observation highlights the importance of electrical stimulation which approximates naturalistic RGC responses, in comparison with the static pixel-wise approaches used in existing implants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The performance of greedy temporal dithering translates to natural viewing conditions.
“Hence, the performance of greedy temporal dithering translates to natural viewing conditions and reveals that more accurate image reconstruction is possible with fixational eye movements (Wu et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wu et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
The optimization problem is NP complete due to the integer constraints on w.
“The optimization problem is NP complete due to the integer constraints on w.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Both studies only considered simple visual stimuli which can be described by lines (such as English letters and numbers) or a few dots.
“However, both studies only considered simple visual stimuli which can be described by lines (such as English letters and numbers) or a few dots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The less accurate reconstruction by static pixel-wise mapping is likely due to coactivation of overlapping ON and OFF cell types.
“Even using this generous upper bound, static pixel-wise mapping resulted in significantly less accurate reconstruction of the target image (Figure 3D, H), likely due to coactivation of overlapping ON and OFF cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing address the challenges of precisely controlling the activity of diverse cell types in a neural population by rapidly delivering a sequence of simple electrical stimuli with independent effects within a visual integration window.
“Greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing address the challenges of precisely controlling the activity of diverse cell types in a neural population by rapidly delivering a sequence of simple electrical stimuli with independent effects within a visual integration window.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
- Interpretationreasoning
The greedy dithering approach with a perceptually accurate reconstruction metric could lead to higher performance in an implanted device.
“Thus, the greedy dithering approach with a perceptually accurate reconstruction metric could lead to higher performance in an implanted device, though additional developments will be needed before such an optimization can be performed in real time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A strategy for efficient implant operation is to identify the most frequently used ~50% of electrodes during calibration and permanently turn off the remaining electrodes during run-time usage.
“These observations suggest a strategy for efficient implant operation in a retina-specific manner: identify the most frequently used ~50% of electrodes during calibration and permanently turn off the remaining electrodes during run-time usage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
RGC receptive fields form a uniform mosaic sampling the visual field with little overlap.
“This is approximately true: RGC receptive fields form a uniform mosaic sampling the visual field with little overlap (Devries and Baylor, 1997; Chichilnisky and Kalmar, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Devries and Baylor, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chichilnisky and Kalmar, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
One study deployed a dynamic stimulation approach that demonstrated impressive performance in human participants.
“Electrical stimulation of the visual cortex has also been tested for vision restoration (Chen et al., 2020), and one study (Beauchamp et al., 2020) deployed a dynamic stimulation approach that demonstrated impressive performance in human participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beauchamp et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Applying the algorithmic framework to the ex vivo lab prototype leads to insights relevant to the development of an in vivo implant.
“Thus, applying the algorithmic framework to the ex vivo lab prototype leads to insights relevant to the development of an in vivo implant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Each evoked spike influences the reconstruction at multiple subsequent time steps.
“Hence, each evoked spike influences the reconstruction at multiple subsequent time steps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
- May combine two claims. 16
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenON (OFF) parasol cells were stimulated more than OFF (ON) parasol cells in bright (dark) regions of the target stimulus.
“Not surprisingly, ON (OFF) parasol cells were stimulated more than OFF (ON) parasol cells in bright (dark) regions of the target stimulus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn the rat retina, putative ON brisk transient and OFF brisk transient cells formed reasonably complete mosaics covering the region recorded and had properties broadly resembling those of ON and OFF parasol cells in the macaque retina.
“In the rat retina, analysis was restricted to two RGC types – putative ON brisk transient and OFF brisk transient cells identified by their receptive fields and spiking autocorrelation (Ravi et al., 2018) – which formed reasonably complete mosaics covering the region recorded and had properties broadly resembling those of ON and OFF parasol cells in the macaque retina.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ravi et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe reconstruction for individual trials was similar to the average across multiple trials, indicating that the noise from inter-trial response variation was relatively small.
“Moreover, the reconstruction for individual trials was similar to the average across multiple trials, indicating that the noise from inter-trial response variation was relatively small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe absolute change in activation threshold with increasing distance between stimulating electrodes was summarized (Figure 5B).
“Figure 5B summarizes the absolute change in threshold with increasing distance between stimulating electrodes, generated by computing the weighted mean and the resampled standard error of the weighted mean for test pairs near each distance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSubsequent analysis was restricted to two numerically dominant ON and OFF cell types, which each formed nearly complete mosaics across the array.
“Subsequent analysis was restricted to two numerically dominant ON and OFF cell types, which each formed nearly complete mosaics across the array.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe algorithm was useful in identifying a subset of the most effective electrodes for a particular retina, which could substantially reduce power consumption in an implant.
“The algorithm was useful in identifying a subset of the most effective electrodes for a particular retina, which could substantially reduce power consumption in an implant.”
- Also stated in: § Dynamic optimization framework enables data-driven hardware design · hedged
“These observations suggest a strategy for efficient implant operation in a retina-specific manner: identify the most frequently used ~50% of electrodes during calibration and permanently turn off the remaining electrodes during run-time usage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Dynamic optimization framework enables data-driven hardware design · hedged
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe effect of stimulation with many closely spaced electrodes on neural activity is generally complex and nonlinear, which severely limits the ability to produce desired spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity for sensory restoration.
“However, the effect of stimulation with many closely spaced electrodes on neural activity is generally complex and nonlinear, which severely limits the ability to produce the desired spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity for sensory restoration.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“However, it can be difficult to predict and control evoked neural responses to simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation due to nonlinearity of the responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jepson et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe higher error with evoked responses is presumably due to non-stationarity in the ex vivo recordings and/or failures of independence due to temporal dithering.
“Second, the reconstruction error obtained using the RGC responses evoked by the stimulation sequence was higher than the error obtained using calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation (Figure 4G, bottom), presumably reflecting non-stationarity in the ex vivo recordings and/or failures of independence due to temporal dithering (Figure 4G, see Discussion).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe dynamic optimization framework presented here could provide a way to precisely control neural activity for arbitrarily complex stimuli and improve the performance of a range of cortical sensory implants.
“The dynamic optimization framework presented here could provide a way to precisely control neural activity for arbitrarily complex stimuli and improve the performance of a range of cortical sensory implants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough the greedy algorithm is nearly optimal for a single-electrode dictionary, the reconstruction performance of an artificial retina could be improved by enhancing the dictionary (e.g. by using calibrated, optimized multi-electrode stimulation patterns).
“Thus, although the greedy algorithm is nearly optimal for a single-electrode dictionary, the reconstruction performance of an artificial retina could be improved by enhancing the dictionary (e.g. by using calibrated, optimized multi-electrode stimulation patterns; Jepson et al., 2014; Vasireddy et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenA fourth method approximates the function of present-day retinal implants by optimizing a mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude for each electrode.
“Finally, a fourth method approximates the function of present-day retinal implants by optimizing a mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude for each electrode.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe dynamic optimization framework extends naturally to naturalistic viewing conditions with eye movements.
“The dynamic optimization framework extends naturally to this situation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe second method provides an upper bound on the optimal solution by jointly optimizing a vector of the number of times each dictionary element is used.
“The second method provides an upper bound on the optimal solution by jointly optimizing a vector of the number of times each dictionary element is used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Neural responses are generated independently across time steps.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough this procedure exceeds the capabilities of current devices, two features of the approach support implementation on implantable hardware with a limited size and power budget.
“Although this procedure exceeds the capabilities of current devices, two features of the approach support implementation on implantable hardware with a limited size and power budget.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing approach relies on the ability to efficiently compute and deliver optimal electrical stimuli in a bidirectional electronic implant.
“The greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing approach relies on the ability to efficiently compute and deliver optimal electrical stimuli in a bidirectional electronic implant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe number of stimulations to reach asymptotic quality in rat retina was significantly smaller than in macaque retina, likely in part because of the smaller number of cells in the rat recordings.
“These reconstructions reached asymptotic quality with 225 ± 29 stimulations (not shown), a significantly smaller number than in tests obtained with macaque retina (Figure 3G), likely in part because of the smaller number of cells in the rat recordings (see Discussion).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe first method provides a greedy solution which can be deployed in real time and handles dependencies between successive stimuli.
“The first method provides a greedy solution which can be deployed in real time and handles dependencies between successive stimuli.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Neural responses are generated independently across time steps.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMSE does not accurately capture perceived differences in image content, whereas SSIM more closely parallels perception.
“Specifically, the mean squared error (MSE) measure of reconstruction accuracy, while convenient, does not accurately capture perceived differences in image content, whereas error metrics such as Structural Similarity (SSIM) more closely parallel perception (Wang et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationElectrical stimulation of the visual cortex has been tested for vision restoration.
“Electrical stimulation of the visual cortex has also been tested for vision restoration (Chen et al., 2020), and one study (Beauchamp et al., 2020) deployed a dynamic stimulation approach that demonstrated impressive performance in human participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationCustom circuitry disconnected the recording amplifiers during stimulation, reducing stimulation artifacts and making it possible to identify elicited spikes on the stimulating electrode as well as nearby electrodes.
“Custom circuitry disconnected the recording amplifiers during stimulation, reducing stimulation artifacts and making it possible to identify elicited spikes on the stimulating electrode as well as nearby electrodes (Hottowy et al., 2012; Jepson et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenA third method relaxes the above objective to provide an upper bound on performance with no electrical stimulation constraints by directly optimizing the number of spikes for each cell.
“A third method relaxes the above objective to provide an upper bound on performance with no electrical stimulation constraints by directly optimizing the number of spikes for each cell.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Neural responses are generated independently across time steps.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationFor each identified RGC type, the receptive fields formed a regular mosaic covering the region of retina recorded, confirming the correspondence to a morphologically distinct RGC type.
“For each identified RGC type, the receptive fields formed a regular mosaic covering the region of retina recorded (Devries and Baylor, 1997; Field and Chichilnisky, 2007), confirming the correspondence to a morphologically distinct RGC type (Dacey, 1993; Wässle et al., 1981), and in some cases revealing complete recordings from the population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Devries and Baylor, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Field and Chichilnisky, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dacey, 1993 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningSeveral technical innovations are required to enable chronic in vivo recording and stimulation.
“However, several technical innovations are required to enable chronic in vivo recording and stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis approach avoids nonlinear interactions resulting from simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation while providing enough flexibility to elicit rich spatiotemporal response patterns using a sequence of single-electrode stimulation patterns.
“This approach avoids nonlinear interactions resulting from simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation while providing enough flexibility to elicit rich spatiotemporal response patterns using a sequence of single-electrode stimulation patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationDictionary elements that involved activating distant cells along their axons were removed due to the unknown receptive field locations and thus uncertain contribution to stimulus reconstruction.
“Dictionary elements that involved activating distant cells along their axons were removed due to the unknown receptive field locations and thus uncertain contribution to stimulus reconstruction (Grosberg et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grosberg et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningA single dictionary element that did not activate any cell was included to avoid stimulation when any real stimulation pattern would increase error.
“A single dictionary element that did not activate any cell was included to avoid stimulation when any real stimulation pattern would increase error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe simplified formulation for perceptual similarity does not account for inter-trial variability.
“Note that unlike the algorithm presented above, this formulation does not account for inter-trial variability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe expanded stimulation interval was necessary to determine evoked RGC response probabilities for each target.
“The expanded stimulation interval was necessary to determine evoked RGC response probabilities for each target, which were identified using the same custom template matching approach used for the single-electrode stimulation scan.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenDictionary elements that elicited axon bundle activity or had at least one cell with a poor sigmoid fit were permanently removed from the dictionary.
“Dictionary elements that elicited axon bundle activity or had at least one cell with a poor sigmoid fit were permanently removed from the dictionary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The brain reconstructs the visual image from neural responses.
“In either case, the neural responses are eventually processed by the brain to elicit perception, through a process assumed to involve reconstruction of the image.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Linear reconstruction is assumed for the objective.
“For simplicity, linear reconstruction is assumed, and the objective is the minimum squared error between the target image and the reconstructed image.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
If many single-electrode stimuli are provided in rapid succession, they evoke visual sensations similar to those that would be produced by simultaneous stimulation, because of long visual integration times in the brain.
“The effectiveness of this method relies on assuming that if many such stimuli are provided in rapid succession (e.g. 0.1-ms interval), they evoke visual sensations similar to those that would be produced by simultaneous stimulation (Figure 1D), because of long visual integration times in the brain (e.g. tens of ms, see Discussion).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The total expected spike count evoked by a sequence of electrical stimuli is the sum of the expected spikes for all the individual stimuli.
“A crucial assumption of the algorithm is that the total expected spike count evoked by a sequence of electrical stimuli is the sum of the expected spikes for all the individual stimuli.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Temporal dithering maintains the independence of the responses evoked by single-electrode stimuli.
“Then, the visual target was linearly reconstructed from the stimulation sequence using samples drawn from the single-electrode calibration data, under the assumption that temporal dithering maintains the independence of the responses evoked by single-electrode stimuli. Note that this assumption was later tested (see below).”
The paper relies on this without support.
When a cell is repeatedly stimulated, the activation probabilities associated with later stimuli are reduced because of biophysical refractoriness.
“However, when a cell is repeatedly stimulated, the activation probabilities associated with later stimuli are reduced, because of biophysical refractoriness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Progress toward restoring high-fidelity natural vision using epiretinal implants has slowed, likely in part due to indiscriminate activation of many RGCs of different cell types and a resulting inaccurate neural representation of the target stimulus.
“After initial successes, progress toward restoring high-fidelity natural vision using this approach has slowed, likely in part due to indiscriminate activation of many RGCs of different cell types and a resulting inaccurate neural representation of the target stimulus.”
The paper relies on this without support.
One reason for indiscriminate activation is the difficulty of predicting the neural activity evoked by multi-electrode stimulation based on the activity evoked by single-electrode stimulation.
“One reason for this indiscriminate activation is the difficulty of predicting the neural activity evoked by multi-electrode stimulation based on the activity evoked by single-electrode stimulation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.
“A major assumption is that downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so that perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Visual sensations produced in the brain are based on linear reconstruction of the incident image from retinal inputs.
“Another important assumption is that visual sensations produced in the brain are based on linear reconstruction of the incident image from retinal inputs.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies.
“First, the brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies (e.g. 0.73 ± 0.05 ms Sekirnjak et al., 2011), in part because the mechanism of activation is direct depolarization rather than network-mediated excitation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.
“Second, electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses (Talaminos-Barroso et al., 2020), making temporal dithering possible.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
“Third, distant electrodes generate independent responses (Figure 5), making spatial multiplexing possible.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
It is possible to deliver a sufficiently large number of electrical stimuli within a visual integration time to produce high quality artificial vision.
“Finally, the approach relies on the assumption that it is possible to deliver a sufficiently large number of electrical stimuli within a visual integration time to produce high quality artificial vision.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Neural responses are generated independently across time steps.
“The responses are stochastic with ri∼Bernoulli(pci) and we assume that responses are generated independently across time steps.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alternative stimulation strategies have not been validated in vivo in humans using perceptually relevant pulse-train stimulation, and most do not address the substantial day-to-day variability in cortical responses that limits clinical reliability.
“While alternative stimulation strategies have been proposed [25–39], none have been validated in vivo in humans using perceptually relevant pulse-train stimulation, and most do not address the substantial day-to-day variability in cortical responses that limits clinical reliability.”
From Deep Learning–Based Control of Electrically Evoked Activity in Human Visual Cortex (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrevious attempts at electrically evoking targeted neural activity have shown varied success, often limited to simulations, retinal explants, or prefrontal cortex brain states in non-human primates, yet never in awake humans.
“Previous attempts at electrically evoking targeted neural activity have shown varied success, often limited to simulations [33, 39], retinal explants [27], or prefrontal cortex brain states in non-human primates [49], yet never in awake humans.”
From Deep Learning–Based Control of Electrically Evoked Activity in Human Visual Cortex (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · see citing works
Yarbus, A. L. (1967) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7 · Cited by 3,304 · see citing works
(1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,212 · see citing works
Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change
Merabet, L. B., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2758 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex
Flesher, S. N., Collinger, J. L., Foldes, S. T., Weiss, J. M., Downey, J. E., Tyler-Kabara, E. C., Bensmaia, S. J., Schwartz, A. B., Boninger, M. L., & Gaunt, R. A. (2016) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8083 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis
Humayun, M. S., Dorn, J. D., da Cruz, L., Dagnelie, G., Sahel, J.-A., Stanga, P. E., Cideciyan, A. V., Duncan, J. L., Eliott, D., Filley, E., et al. (2012) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.028 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Cell Types of the Human Retina and Its Organoids at Single-Cell Resolution
Cowan, C. S., Renner, M., De Gennaro, M., Gross-Scherf, B., Goldblum, D., Hou, Y., Munz, M., Rodrigues, T. M., Krol, J., Szikra, T., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.013 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
(1998) · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Precisely correlated firing in cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus
Alonso, J., Usrey, W. M., & Reid, R. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/383815a0 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
The structure and precision of retinal spike trains
Berry, M. J., Warland, D. K., & Meister, M. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.10.5411 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
The mosaic of midget ganglion cells in the human retina
Dacey, D. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-12-05334.1993 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS
Stingl, K., Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Besch, D., Braun, A., Bruckmann, A., Gekeler, F., Greppmaier, U., Hipp, S., Hörtdörfer, G., Kernstock, C., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0077 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
The Speed of Alpha-Band Oscillations Predicts the Temporal Resolution of Visual Perception
Samaha, J., & Postle, B. R. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.007 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Functional Asymmetries in ON and OFF Ganglion Cells of Primate Retina
Chichilnisky, E. J., & Kalmar, R. S. (2002) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-07-02737.2002 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Self-citationDecoding Visual Information From a Population of Retinal Ganglion Cells
Warland, D. K., Reinagel, P., & Meister, M. (1997) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1997.78.5.2336 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Refractoriness and Neural Precision
Berry, M. J., & Meister, M. (1998) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-06-02200.1998 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Information Processing in the Primate Retina: Circuitry and Coding
Field, G. D., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094252 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Self-citationKeat, J., Reinagel, P., Reid, R. C., & Meister, M. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00322-1 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Mosaic Arrangement of Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields in Rabbit Retina
DeVries, S. H., & Baylor, D. A. (1997) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1997.78.4.2048 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Dendritic territories of cat retinal ganglion cells
Wässle, H., Peichl, L., & Boycott, B. B. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/292344a0 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators
Rouger, J., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Denève, S., Déguine, O., & Barone, P. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609419104 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Litke, A. M., Bezayiff, N., Chichilnisky, E. J., Cunningham, W. R., Dąbrowski, W., Grillo, A. A., Grivich, M., Gryboś, P., Hottowy, P., Kachiguine, S., et al. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · doi:10.1109/tns.2004.832706 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Self-citationCochlear Implantation in Adults
Gaylor, J. M., Raman, G., Chung, M. C., Lee, J., Rao, M., Lau, J., & Poe, D. S. (2013) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1744 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Proprioceptive and cutaneous sensations in humans elicited by intracortical microstimulation
Armenta Salas, M., Bashford, L., Kellis, S., Jafari, M., Jo, H., Kramer, D., Shanfield, K., Pejsa, K., Lee, B., Liu, C. Y., et al. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.32904 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Dynamic Stimulation of Visual Cortex Produces Form Vision in Sighted and Blind Humans
Beauchamp, M. S., Oswalt, D., Sun, P., Foster, B. L., Magnotti, J. F., Niketeghad, S., Pouratian, N., Bosking, W. H., & Yoshor, D. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.033 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Shape perception via a high-channel-count neuroprosthesis in monkey visual cortex
Chen, X., Wang, F., Fernandez, E., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abd7435 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Perge, J. A., Homer, M. L., Malik, W. Q., Cash, S., Eskandar, E., Friehs, G., Donoghue, J. P., & Hochberg, L. R. (2013) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036004 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Photovoltaic Restoration of Central Vision in Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Palanker, D., Le Mer, Y., Mohand-Said, S., Muqit, M., & Sahel, J. A. (2020) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.024 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Mobility performance with a pixelized vision system.
Cha, K., Horch, K. W., & Normann, R. A. (1992) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90229-c · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Response Variability and Timing Precision of Neuronal Spike Trains In Vivo
Reich, D. S., Victor, J. D., Knight, B. W., Ozaki, T., & Kaplan, E. (1997) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1997.77.5.2836 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Precision of Spike Trains in Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells
Uzzell, V., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01171.2003 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Self-citationIntracortical recording stability in human brain–computer interface users
Downey, J. E., Schwed, N., Chase, S. M., Schwartz, A. B., & Collinger, J. L. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aab7a0 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
A model of ganglion axon pathways accounts for percepts elicited by retinal implants
Beyeler, M., Nanduri, D., Weiland, J. D., Rokem, A., Boynton, G. M., & Fine, I. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45416-4 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Temporal Integration Windows in Neural Processing and Perception Aligned to Saccadic Eye Movements
Wutz, A., Muschter, E., van Koningsbruggen, M. G., Weisz, N., & Melcher, D. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.070 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance
Loudin, J., Simanovskii, D. M., Vijayraghavan, K., Sramek, C., Butterwick, A., Huie, P., McLean, G. Y., & Palanker, D. (2007) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/4/1/s09 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Fidelity of the Ensemble Code for Visual Motion in Primate Retina
Frechette, E. S., Sher, A., Grivich, M. I., Petrusca, D., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01175.2004 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnson, L., Wander, J. D., Sarma, D., Su, D. K., Fetz, E. E., & Ojemann, J. G. (2013) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036021 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Spatially patterned electrical stimulation to enhance resolution of retinal prostheses
Jepson, L. H., Hottowy, P., Mathieson, K., Gunning, D. E., Dąbrowski, W., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2882-13.2014 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationChanges in physiological properties of rat ganglion cells during retinal degeneration
Sekirnjak, C., Jepson, L. H., Hottowy, P., Sher, A., Dąbrowski, W., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01061.2010 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationJepson, L. H., Hottowy, P., Mathieson, K., Gunning, D. E., Dąbrowski, W., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4967-12.2013 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationOrigins of spontaneous activity in the degenerating retina
Trenholm, S., & Awatramani, G. B. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00277 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Activation of ganglion cells and axon bundles using epiretinal electrical stimulation
Grosberg, L. E., Ganesan, K., Goetz, G. A., Madugula, S. S., Bhaskhar, N., Fan, V., Li, P., Hottowy, P., Dabrowski, W., Sher, A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00750.2016 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Hottowy, P., Skoczeń, A., Gunning, D. E., Kachiguine, S., Mathieson, K., Sher, A., Wiącek, P., Litke, A. M., & Dąbrowski, W. (2012) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/9/6/066005 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationPathway-specific asymmetries between on and off visual signals
Ravi, S., Ahn, D., Greschner, M., Chichilnisky, E. J., & Field, G. D. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2008-18.2018 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationAnatomical Identification of Extracellularly Recorded Cells in Large-Scale Multielectrode Recordings
Li, P. H., Gauthier, J. L., Schiff, M. L., Sher, A., Ahn, D., Field, G. D., Greschner, M., Callaway, E. M., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3675-14.2015 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationUnusual Physiological Properties of Smooth Monostratified Ganglion Cell Types in Primate Retina
Rhoades, C. E., Shah, N. P., Manookin, M. B., Brackbill, N., Kling, A., Goetz, G., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.036 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationReconstruction of natural images from responses of primate retinal ganglion cells
Brackbill, N., Rhoades, C., Kling, A., Shah, N. P., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.58516 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient Coding by Midget and Parasol Ganglion Cells in the Human Retina
Soto, F., Hsiang, J.-C., Rajagopal, R., Piggott, K., Harocopos, G. J., Couch, S. M., Custer, P. L., Morgan, J., & Kerschensteiner, D. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.030 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
End-to-end optimization of prosthetic vision
de Ruyter van Steveninck, J., Güçlü, U., van Wezel, R., & van Gerven, M. (2022) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.22.2.20 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Neural Networks for Efficient Bayesian Decoding of Natural Images from Retinal NeuronsPreprint
Parthasarathy, N., Batty, E., Falcon, W., Rutten, T., Rajpal, M., Chichilnisky, E. J., & Paninski, L. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/153759 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationElectrical stimulus artifact cancellation and neural spike detection on large multi-electrode arrays
Mena, G. E., Grosberg, L. E., Madugula, S. S., Hottowy, P., Litke, A. M., Cunningham, J. P., Chichilnisky, E. J., & Paninski, L. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005842 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationGoo, Y. S., Park, D. J., Ahn, J. R., & Senok, S. S. (2016) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00512 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Epiretinal stimulation with local returns enhances selectivity at cellular resolution
Fan, V. H., Grosberg, L. E., Madugula, S. S., Hottowy, P., Dąbrowski, W., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aaeef1 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationLieby, P., Barnes, N. M., McCarthy, C., Liu, N., Dennett, H., Walker, J. G., Botea, V., & Scott, A. F. (2011) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6091977 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Category selectivity for animals and man-made objects: Beyond low- and mid-level visual features
He, C., & Cheung, O. S. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.12.22 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Eliciting naturalistic cortical responses with a sensory prosthesis via optimized microstimulation
Choi, J. S., Brockmeier, A. J., McNiel, D., von Kraus, L. M., Príncipe, J. C., & Francis, J. T. (2016) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/13/5/056007 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Temporal Limits of Visual Motion Processing: Psychophysics and Neurophysiology
Borghuis, B. G., Tadin, D., Lankheet, M. J., Lappin, J. S., & van de GRIND, W. A. (2019) · Vision · doi:10.3390/vision3010005 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Learning to control the brain through adaptive closed-loop patterned stimulation
Tafazoli, S., MacDowell, C. J., Che, Z., Letai, K. C., Steinhardt, C. R., & Buschman, T. J. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abb860 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Ground surface segmentation for navigation with a low resolution visual prosthesis
McCarthy, C., Barnes, N., & Lieby, P. (2011) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2011.6091105 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
The argus ii retinal prosthesis system
Bloch, E., & da Cruz, L. (2020) · Prosthesis · doi:10.5772/intechopen.84947 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Simplification of Visual Rendering in Simulated Prosthetic Vision Facilitates Navigation
Vergnieux, V., Macé, M. J. ‐., & Jouffrais, C. (2017) · Artificial Organs · doi:10.1111/aor.12868 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
High-Fidelity Reproduction of Visual Signals by Electrical Stimulation in the Central Primate Retina
Gogliettino, A. R., Madugula, S. S., Grosberg, L. E., Vilkhu, R. S., Brown, J., Nguyen, H., Kling, A., Hottowy, P., Dąbrowski, W., Sher, A., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1091-22.2023 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationHottowy, P., Dąbrowski, W., Skoczeń, A., & Wiacek, P. K. (2007) · Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/s10470-007-9125-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationNonlinear Decoding of Natural Images From Large-Scale Primate Retinal Ganglion Recordings
Kim, Y. J., Brackbill, N., Batty, E., Lee, J., Mitelut, C., Tong, W. L., Chichilnisky, E. J., & Paninski, L. (2021) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01395 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationFocal electrical stimulation of human retinal ganglion cells for vision restoration
Madugula, S. S., Gogliettino, A. R., Zaidi, M., Aggarwal, G., Kling, A., Shah, N. P., Brown, J. B., Vilkhu, R., Hays, M. R., Nguyen, H., et al. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aca5b5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationPerformance of complex visual tasks using simulated prosthetic vision via augmented-reality glasses
Ho, E., Boffa, J., & Palanker, D. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.13.22 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Functional organization of midget and parasol ganglion cells in the human retina
Kling, A., Gogliettino, A. R., Shah, N. P., Wu, E. G., Brackbill, N., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Silva, R. A., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.07.240762 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationHigh temporal precision for perceiving event offsets
Tadin, D., Lappin, J. S., Blake, R., & Glasser, D. M. (2010) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.005 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Spatially patterned bi-electrode epiretinal stimulation for axon avoidance at cellular resolution
Vilkhu, R. S., Madugula, S. S., Grosberg, L. E., Gogliettino, A. R., Hottowy, P., Dąbrowski, W., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Mitra, S., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac3450 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep Learning–Based Perceptual Stimulus Encoder for Bionic Vision
Relic, L., Zhang, B., Tuan, Y.-L., & Beyeler, M. (2022) · Augmented Humans International Conference (AHs) · doi:10.1145/3519391.3524034 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Wu, E. G., Brackbill, N., Rhoades, C. E., Kling, A., Gogliettino, A. R., Shah, N. P., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Simoncelli, E. P., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52304-7 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationHybrid Neural Autoencoders for Stimulus Encoding in Visual and Other Sensory Neuroprostheses
Granley, J., Relic, L., & Beyeler, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.13623 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Automatic Identification of Axon Bundle Activation for Epiretinal Prosthesis
Tandon, P., Bhaskhar, N., Shah, N. P., Madugula, S. S., Grosberg, L. E., Fan, V. H., Hottowy, P., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Chichilnisky, E. J., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2021.3128486 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, E. G., Brackbill, N., Rhoades, C. E., Kling, A., Gogliettino, A. R., Shah, N. P., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Simoncelli, E. P., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.12.552902 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationHaji Ghaffari, D., Akwaboah, A. D., Mirzakhalili, E., & Weiland, J. D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2021.3138297 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Models based on cellular automata for the analysis of biomedical systems
Taláminos-Barroso, A., Reina‐Tosina, J., & Roa-Romero, L. M. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817461-6.00014-7 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Inferring light responses of primate retinal ganglion cells using intrinsic electrical signatures
Zaidi, M. H., Aggarwal, G., Shah, N. P., Karniol-Tambour, O., Goetz, G. A., Madugula, S. S., Gogliettino, A. R., Wu, E. G., Kling, A., Brackbill, N., et al. (2023) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ace657 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationHybrid Neural Autoencoders for Stimulus Encoding in Visual and Other Sensory Neuroprostheses.
Granley, J., Relic, L., & Beyeler, M. (2022) · PubMed · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Wu, E. G., Brackbill, N., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Simoncelli, E. P., & Chichilnisky, E. J. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.19.492737 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationInferring light responses of primate retinal ganglion cells using intrinsic electrical signaturesPreprint
Zaidi, M. H., Aggarwal, G., Shah, N. P., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.29.493858 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient Modeling and Calibration of Multi-Electrode Stimuli for Epiretinal Implants
Vasireddy, P. K., Gogliettino, A. R., Brown, J. B., Vilkhu, R. S., Madugula, S. S., Phillips, A. J., Mitral, S., Hottowy, P., Sher, A., Litke, A., et al. (2023) · 2023 11th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) · doi:10.1109/ner52421.2023.10123907 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationPartitioned Temporal Dithering for Efficient Epiretinal Electrical Stimulation
Lotlikar, A., Shah, N. P., Gogliettino, A. R., Vilkhu, R. S., Madugula, S. S., Grosberg, L. E., Hottowy, P., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Chichilnisky, E. J., et al. (2023) · International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · doi:10.1109/ner52421.2023.10123787 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationDeep Learning-Based Perceptual Stimulus Encoder for Bionic VisionPreprint
Relic, L., Zhang, B., Tuan, Y.-L., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.05604 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Richard, 2015, Recognizing Retinal Ganglion Cells in the Dark, 2476
Cited by
Sorted by citations
High-Fidelity Reproduction of Visual Signals by Electrical Stimulation in the Central Primate Retina
Gogliettino, A. R., Madugula, S. S., Grosberg, L. E., Vilkhu, R. S., Brown, J., Nguyen, H., Kling, A., Hottowy, P., Dąbrowski, W., Sher, A., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1091-22.2023 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review
Pawlak, W. A., & Howard, N. (2025) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1570104 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Restoration of Sight with Electronic Retinal Prostheses
Palanker, D., Weiland, J. D., Rosin, B., & Sahel, J. (2025) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-110323-025244 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Lu, Z., Gui, L., Sun, X., Wang, K., Lan, Y., Deng, Y., Cao, S., & Xu, K. (2024) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.150363 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Visual Prostheses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence Technology
Sarbout, I., Gungor, A., Ounissi, M., Zaher, S., Ptito, M., Kupers, R., Racoceanu, D., & Milea, D. (2025) · Eye and Brain · doi:10.2147/eb.s524322 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Vasireddy, P. K., Vilkhu, R. S., Lotlikar, A., Brown, J. B., Phillips, A., Gogliettino, A. R., Hays, M. R., Baum, C., Kato, E. J., Sharon, A., et al. (2026) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116917 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural population dynamics of direct electrical stimulation of neocortex
Hickman, J. L., Hughes, G., Sahai, E., Miles, M., & Denman, D. J. (2026) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117420 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Spontaneous Dynamics Predict the Effects of Targeted Intervention in Hippocampal Neuronal CulturesPreprint
Tentori, E., Kastellakis, G., Maschietto, M., Leparulo, A., Poirazi, P., Bernardi, D., Mazzucato, L., Allegra, M., & Vassanelli, S. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.04.29.651327
Material Strategies for Stimulation and Recording in Neural Biocomputing Platforms
Kang, S., Park, J., Joshi, A., Haque, R., Hwang, G. W., & Kong, H. (2026) · Advanced Electronic Materials · doi:10.1002/aelm.70363
A Dynamic Virtual Channel Approach to Enhance Retinal Prosthetic Precision
Liu, Z., Guo, T., He, Y., Zheng, S., Song, X., Dai, C., Li, J., Chai, X., Chen, Y., & Li, L. (2026) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics11050307
Phillips, A., Lotlikar, A., Kling, A., Hays, M. R., Vasireddy, P. K., Hofflich, B., Sharon, A., Sommeling, M., Brown, J. B., Baum, C., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.04.721188
Self-citationRetinal ganglion cell function: ON and OFF pathways
Field, G. D. (2026) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-22193-4.00015-9
Stimulus Optimization Using the Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Visual Neuroprostheses
Pratiwi, A. M., Jara-Balsera, J., Guzmán-Miranda, H., Suaning, G. J., & Barriga‐Rivera, A. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2026.3706302
Nguyen, C. K., Azami, A., Nguyen, M. A., Negi, S., & Cogan, S. F. (2025) · International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · doi:10.1109/ner61569.2025.11589125
Deep Learning–Based Control of Electrically Evoked Activity in Human Visual Cortex
Moure, P., Granley, J., Grani, F., Soo, L., Lozano, A., López-Peco, R., Villamarin-Ortiz, A., Soto-Sanchez, C., Liu, S.-C., Beyeler, M., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.09.24.678361
- Authors
- Shah, N. P., Phillips, A., Madugula, S., Lotlikar, A., Gogliettino, A. R., Hays, M. R., Grosberg, L., Brown, J., Dusi, A., Tandon, P., Hottowy, P., Dabrowski, W., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Mitra, S., & Chichilnisky, E.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Department of Electrical Engineering
- AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shah, Nishal Pradeepbhai
- ORCID
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2024-11-07
- Volume
- 13
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11542921
- OpenAlex
- W4404142089
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ALS Association
- National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (2146755)
- National Science Foundation (1828993, NSF/CRCNS)
- National Eye Institute (F30-EY-030776-03, F31-EY-033636, R01-EY021271, R01-EY029247, P30-EY019005)
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH-020016)
- The Fondation Bertarelli
- The Stanford Neurosciences Graduate Program
- Polish Academy of Sciences (DEC-2013/10/M/NZ4/00268)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- neurostimulation, retinal prosthesis, vision restoration, multi-electrode stimulation, spatial multiplexing, stimulus reconstruction, retinal ganglion cells, closed-loop stimulation, sensory recovery, macaque retina, rat retina
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Macaca, Macaca mulatta, Photic Stimulation, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Rats, Visual Prosthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review