Cited by 15Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeural dynamics and brain function

Precise control of neural activity using dynamically optimized electrical stimulation

Open access
Shah, Nishal Pradeepbhai, Phillips, AJ, Madugula, Sasidhar, Lotlikar, Amrith, Gogliettino, Alex R, Hays, Madeline Rose, Grosberg, Lauren, Brown, Jeff +8 more·2024·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Neural implants have the potential to restore lost sensory function by electrically evoking the complex naturalistic activity patterns of neural populations. However, it can be difficult to predict and control evoked neural responses to simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation due to nonlinearity of the responses. We present a solution to this problem and demonstrate its utility in the context of a bidirectional retinal implant for restoring vision. A dynamically optimized stimulation approach encodes incoming visual stimuli into a rapid, greedily chosen, temporally dithered and spatially multiplexed sequence of simple stimulation patterns. Stimuli are selected to optimize the reconstruction of the visual stimulus from the evoked responses. Temporal dithering exploits the slow time scales of downstream neural processing, and spatial multiplexing exploits the independence of responses generated by distant electrodes. The approach was evaluated using an experimental laboratory prototype of a retinal implant: large-scale, high-resolution multi-electrode stimulation and recording of macaque and rat retinal ganglion cells ex vivo. The dynamically optimized stimulation approach substantially enhanced performance compared to existing approaches based on static mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude. The modular framework enabled parallel extensions to naturalistic viewing conditions, incorporation of perceptual similarity measures, and efficient implementation for an implantable device. A direct closed-loop test of the approach supported its potential use in vision restoration.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper presents a dynamically optimized electrical stimulation framework that encodes visual stimuli into greedily selected, temporally dithered, and spatially multiplexed single-electrode stimulation patterns to better reconstruct neural activity for retinal implants. In ex vivo macaque and rat retina, this approach substantially outperformed static pixel-wise mapping and approached the performance limit of the single-electrode interface.

Key findings

  • Greedy temporal dithering produced more accurate visual stimulus reconstruction than static pixel-wise mapping approximating existing implants, likely by differentially activating ON and OFF RGCs over space.
  • The greedy algorithm was nearly optimal for the single-electrode dictionary: the performance gap was <10%, whereas the gap to “perfect control” with independent cell activation was >40%.
  • Spatial multiplexing was supported by a spatial exclusion radius: activation probability changed <5% in threshold for a secondary electrode 200 µm away.
  • Restricting the dictionary to the most frequently used electrodes reduced reconstruction error by <5% even when up to 50% of electrodes were removed; in naturalistic simulations, fixational eye movements reduced the number of required saccades by ~4× for the same final reconstruction error.

Methods

  • Design: framed stimulation as an optimization problem with a linear reconstruction objective, a dictionary of empirically calibrated single-electrode responses, and a greedy temporal dithering algorithm with spatial multiplexing.
  • Data/sample: ex vivo macaque and rat retina recorded and stimulated with a 512-electrode array at 60 μm spacing; macaque analysis focused on ON/OFF parasol cells, rat validation on putative ON/OFF brisk transient cells. Single-electrode calibration used 512 electrodes individually at 40 amplitudes (0.1–4 µA), 27 times each.
  • Analysis: compared greedy temporal dithering against static pixel-wise mapping, approximate joint optimization, and perfect-control bounds; tested spatial exclusion radius, electrode subsampling, naturalistic eye-movement simulations, and SSIM-based perceptual optimization.

Limitations

  • Stated: the approach assumes slow downstream visual integration over tens of milliseconds, linear reconstruction of the visual image, and independence of responses from interleaved and distant electrodes; the linear reconstruction assumption is “almost certainly wrong in detail.”
  • Stated: closed-loop evoked-response reconstructions were less accurate than calibrated-response reconstructions, attributed to possible ex vivo non-stationarity and/or failures of independence; validation at shorter, implant-relevant stimulation intervals requires better spike sorting.
  • Stated and evident: the work is ex vivo in macaque and rat retina, not a chronic human implant; translational barriers include surgical stability, response non-stationarity, inferring receptive fields/cell types in blind retina, degeneration-related spontaneous activity, and testing in central retina. Evident: perceptual outcomes and patient feedback were not measured, and real-time SSIM optimization was not yet demonstrated.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.83424

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The dynamically optimized stimulation approach substantially enhanced performance compared to existing approaches based on static mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude.

    “The dynamically optimized stimulation approach substantially enhanced performance compared to existing approaches based on static mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “The method produced substantial improvements in stimulus reconstruction compared to existing methods, by appropriately activating ON and OFF RGCs over space.”
    • Also stated in: § Greedy temporal dithering outperforms existing static methods · hedged
      “Even using this generous upper bound, static pixel-wise mapping resulted in significantly less accurate reconstruction of the target image (Figure 3D, H), likely due to coactivation of overlapping ON and OFF cell types.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Many electrical stimuli simultaneously activated two or more cells, often due to axonal stimulation.

    “In general, even though some electrical stimuli selectively activated one cell, many stimuli simultaneously activated two or more cells, often due to axonal stimulation (Figure 1C; Grosberg et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grosberg et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    Examination of many electrode pairs over a range of distances and multiple cells revealed a systematic decrease of the interaction between stimulating electrodes as a function of distance.

    “Examination of many electrode pairs over a range of distances and multiple cells (Figure 5B) revealed a systematic decrease of the interaction between stimulating electrodes as a function of distance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The reconstruction performance benefited from differential activation of ON and OFF cells over space in a way that reflected the spatial distribution of intensities in each target image.

    “Importantly, the reconstruction performance benefited from differential activation of ON and OFF cells over space in a way that reflected the spatial distribution of intensities in each target image (Figure 4E, F).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A minimal (<5%) increase in reconstruction error was observed if the number of available electrodes was reduced by up to 50%.

    “However, a minimal (<5%) increase in reconstruction error was observed if the number of available electrodes was reduced by up to 50% (Figure 6B–F).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    ON (OFF) parasol cells were stimulated more than OFF (ON) parasol cells in bright (dark) regions of the target stimulus.

    “Not surprisingly, ON (OFF) parasol cells were stimulated more than OFF (ON) parasol cells in bright (dark) regions of the target stimulus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In the rat retina, putative ON brisk transient and OFF brisk transient cells formed reasonably complete mosaics covering the region recorded and had properties broadly resembling those of ON and OFF parasol cells in the macaque retina.

    “In the rat retina, analysis was restricted to two RGC types – putative ON brisk transient and OFF brisk transient cells identified by their receptive fields and spiking autocorrelation (Ravi et al., 2018) – which formed reasonably complete mosaics covering the region recorded and had properties broadly resembling those of ON and OFF parasol cells in the macaque retina.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ravi et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The reconstruction for individual trials was similar to the average across multiple trials, indicating that the noise from inter-trial response variation was relatively small.

    “Moreover, the reconstruction for individual trials was similar to the average across multiple trials, indicating that the noise from inter-trial response variation was relatively small.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The absolute change in activation threshold with increasing distance between stimulating electrodes was summarized (Figure 5B).

    “Figure 5B summarizes the absolute change in threshold with increasing distance between stimulating electrodes, generated by computing the weighted mean and the resampled standard error of the weighted mean for test pairs near each distance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Subsequent analysis was restricted to two numerically dominant ON and OFF cell types, which each formed nearly complete mosaics across the array.

    “Subsequent analysis was restricted to two numerically dominant ON and OFF cell types, which each formed nearly complete mosaics across the array.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The algorithm was useful in identifying a subset of the most effective electrodes for a particular retina, which could substantially reduce power consumption in an implant.

    “The algorithm was useful in identifying a subset of the most effective electrodes for a particular retina, which could substantially reduce power consumption in an implant.”
    • Also stated in: § Dynamic optimization framework enables data-driven hardware design · hedged
      “These observations suggest a strategy for efficient implant operation in a retina-specific manner: identify the most frequently used ~50% of electrodes during calibration and permanently turn off the remaining electrodes during run-time usage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The effect of stimulation with many closely spaced electrodes on neural activity is generally complex and nonlinear, which severely limits the ability to produce desired spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity for sensory restoration.

    “However, the effect of stimulation with many closely spaced electrodes on neural activity is generally complex and nonlinear, which severely limits the ability to produce the desired spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity for sensory restoration.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “However, it can be difficult to predict and control evoked neural responses to simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation due to nonlinearity of the responses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jepson et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The higher error with evoked responses is presumably due to non-stationarity in the ex vivo recordings and/or failures of independence due to temporal dithering.

    “Second, the reconstruction error obtained using the RGC responses evoked by the stimulation sequence was higher than the error obtained using calibrated responses to single-electrode stimulation (Figure 4G, bottom), presumably reflecting non-stationarity in the ex vivo recordings and/or failures of independence due to temporal dithering (Figure 4G, see Discussion).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The dynamic optimization framework presented here could provide a way to precisely control neural activity for arbitrarily complex stimuli and improve the performance of a range of cortical sensory implants.

    “The dynamic optimization framework presented here could provide a way to precisely control neural activity for arbitrarily complex stimuli and improve the performance of a range of cortical sensory implants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the greedy algorithm is nearly optimal for a single-electrode dictionary, the reconstruction performance of an artificial retina could be improved by enhancing the dictionary (e.g. by using calibrated, optimized multi-electrode stimulation patterns).

    “Thus, although the greedy algorithm is nearly optimal for a single-electrode dictionary, the reconstruction performance of an artificial retina could be improved by enhancing the dictionary (e.g. by using calibrated, optimized multi-electrode stimulation patterns; Jepson et al., 2014; Vasireddy et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jepson et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vasireddy et al., 2023 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    A fourth method approximates the function of present-day retinal implants by optimizing a mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude for each electrode.

    “Finally, a fourth method approximates the function of present-day retinal implants by optimizing a mapping between visual stimulus intensity and current amplitude for each electrode.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The dynamic optimization framework extends naturally to naturalistic viewing conditions with eye movements.

    “The dynamic optimization framework extends naturally to this situation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The second method provides an upper bound on the optimal solution by jointly optimizing a vector of the number of times each dictionary element is used.

    “The second method provides an upper bound on the optimal solution by jointly optimizing a vector of the number of times each dictionary element is used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Neural responses are generated independently across time steps.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Although this procedure exceeds the capabilities of current devices, two features of the approach support implementation on implantable hardware with a limited size and power budget.

    “Although this procedure exceeds the capabilities of current devices, two features of the approach support implementation on implantable hardware with a limited size and power budget.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing approach relies on the ability to efficiently compute and deliver optimal electrical stimuli in a bidirectional electronic implant.

    “The greedy temporal dithering and spatial multiplexing approach relies on the ability to efficiently compute and deliver optimal electrical stimuli in a bidirectional electronic implant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The number of stimulations to reach asymptotic quality in rat retina was significantly smaller than in macaque retina, likely in part because of the smaller number of cells in the rat recordings.

    “These reconstructions reached asymptotic quality with 225 ± 29 stimulations (not shown), a significantly smaller number than in tests obtained with macaque retina (Figure 3G), likely in part because of the smaller number of cells in the rat recordings (see Discussion).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The first method provides a greedy solution which can be deployed in real time and handles dependencies between successive stimuli.

    “The first method provides a greedy solution which can be deployed in real time and handles dependencies between successive stimuli.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Neural responses are generated independently across time steps.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MSE does not accurately capture perceived differences in image content, whereas SSIM more closely parallels perception.

    “Specifically, the mean squared error (MSE) measure of reconstruction accuracy, while convenient, does not accurately capture perceived differences in image content, whereas error metrics such as Structural Similarity (SSIM) more closely parallel perception (Wang et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Electrical stimulation of the visual cortex has been tested for vision restoration.

    “Electrical stimulation of the visual cortex has also been tested for vision restoration (Chen et al., 2020), and one study (Beauchamp et al., 2020) deployed a dynamic stimulation approach that demonstrated impressive performance in human participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Beauchamp et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Custom circuitry disconnected the recording amplifiers during stimulation, reducing stimulation artifacts and making it possible to identify elicited spikes on the stimulating electrode as well as nearby electrodes.

    “Custom circuitry disconnected the recording amplifiers during stimulation, reducing stimulation artifacts and making it possible to identify elicited spikes on the stimulating electrode as well as nearby electrodes (Hottowy et al., 2012; Jepson et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hottowy et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jepson et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    A third method relaxes the above objective to provide an upper bound on performance with no electrical stimulation constraints by directly optimizing the number of spikes for each cell.

    “A third method relaxes the above objective to provide an upper bound on performance with no electrical stimulation constraints by directly optimizing the number of spikes for each cell.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Neural responses are generated independently across time steps.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    For each identified RGC type, the receptive fields formed a regular mosaic covering the region of retina recorded, confirming the correspondence to a morphologically distinct RGC type.

    “For each identified RGC type, the receptive fields formed a regular mosaic covering the region of retina recorded (Devries and Baylor, 1997; Field and Chichilnisky, 2007), confirming the correspondence to a morphologically distinct RGC type (Dacey, 1993; Wässle et al., 1981), and in some cases revealing complete recordings from the population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Devries and Baylor, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Field and Chichilnisky, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dacey, 1993 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Several technical innovations are required to enable chronic in vivo recording and stimulation.

    “However, several technical innovations are required to enable chronic in vivo recording and stimulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This approach avoids nonlinear interactions resulting from simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation while providing enough flexibility to elicit rich spatiotemporal response patterns using a sequence of single-electrode stimulation patterns.

    “This approach avoids nonlinear interactions resulting from simultaneous multi-electrode stimulation while providing enough flexibility to elicit rich spatiotemporal response patterns using a sequence of single-electrode stimulation patterns.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Distant electrodes generate independent responses.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Dictionary elements that involved activating distant cells along their axons were removed due to the unknown receptive field locations and thus uncertain contribution to stimulus reconstruction.

    “Dictionary elements that involved activating distant cells along their axons were removed due to the unknown receptive field locations and thus uncertain contribution to stimulus reconstruction (Grosberg et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grosberg et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    A single dictionary element that did not activate any cell was included to avoid stimulation when any real stimulation pattern would increase error.

    “A single dictionary element that did not activate any cell was included to avoid stimulation when any real stimulation pattern would increase error.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The simplified formulation for perceptual similarity does not account for inter-trial variability.

    “Note that unlike the algorithm presented above, this formulation does not account for inter-trial variability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The expanded stimulation interval was necessary to determine evoked RGC response probabilities for each target.

    “The expanded stimulation interval was necessary to determine evoked RGC response probabilities for each target, which were identified using the same custom template matching approach used for the single-electrode stimulation scan.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Dictionary elements that elicited axon bundle activity or had at least one cell with a poor sigmoid fit were permanently removed from the dictionary.

    “Dictionary elements that elicited axon bundle activity or had at least one cell with a poor sigmoid fit were permanently removed from the dictionary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
29 of 29
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The brain reconstructs the visual image from neural responses.

    “In either case, the neural responses are eventually processed by the brain to elicit perception, through a process assumed to involve reconstruction of the image.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Linear reconstruction is assumed for the objective.

    “For simplicity, linear reconstruction is assumed, and the objective is the minimum squared error between the target image and the reconstructed image.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    If many single-electrode stimuli are provided in rapid succession, they evoke visual sensations similar to those that would be produced by simultaneous stimulation, because of long visual integration times in the brain.

    “The effectiveness of this method relies on assuming that if many such stimuli are provided in rapid succession (e.g. 0.1-ms interval), they evoke visual sensations similar to those that would be produced by simultaneous stimulation (Figure 1D), because of long visual integration times in the brain (e.g. tens of ms, see Discussion).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The total expected spike count evoked by a sequence of electrical stimuli is the sum of the expected spikes for all the individual stimuli.

    “A crucial assumption of the algorithm is that the total expected spike count evoked by a sequence of electrical stimuli is the sum of the expected spikes for all the individual stimuli.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Temporal dithering maintains the independence of the responses evoked by single-electrode stimuli.

    “Then, the visual target was linearly reconstructed from the stimulation sequence using samples drawn from the single-electrode calibration data, under the assumption that temporal dithering maintains the independence of the responses evoked by single-electrode stimuli. Note that this assumption was later tested (see below).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When a cell is repeatedly stimulated, the activation probabilities associated with later stimuli are reduced because of biophysical refractoriness.

    “However, when a cell is repeatedly stimulated, the activation probabilities associated with later stimuli are reduced, because of biophysical refractoriness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Progress toward restoring high-fidelity natural vision using epiretinal implants has slowed, likely in part due to indiscriminate activation of many RGCs of different cell types and a resulting inaccurate neural representation of the target stimulus.

    “After initial successes, progress toward restoring high-fidelity natural vision using this approach has slowed, likely in part due to indiscriminate activation of many RGCs of different cell types and a resulting inaccurate neural representation of the target stimulus.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    One reason for indiscriminate activation is the difficulty of predicting the neural activity evoked by multi-electrode stimulation based on the activity evoked by single-electrode stimulation.

    “One reason for this indiscriminate activation is the difficulty of predicting the neural activity evoked by multi-electrode stimulation based on the activity evoked by single-electrode stimulation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.

    “A major assumption is that downstream processing of RGC responses is slow, integrating over tens of milliseconds, so that perception depends primarily on the total number of evoked spikes within this time interval.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Visual sensations produced in the brain are based on linear reconstruction of the incident image from retinal inputs.

    “Another important assumption is that visual sensations produced in the brain are based on linear reconstruction of the incident image from retinal inputs.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies.

    “First, the brief (150 µs) and low (<4 µA) current pulses used in this study typically evoke a single spike with low and precise latencies (e.g. 0.73 ± 0.05 ms Sekirnjak et al., 2011), in part because the mechanism of activation is direct depolarization rather than network-mediated excitation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses.

    “Second, electrical stimuli at the same electrode separated by at least 10 ms generate approximately independent responses (Talaminos-Barroso et al., 2020), making temporal dithering possible.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Distant electrodes generate independent responses.

    “Third, distant electrodes generate independent responses (Figure 5), making spatial multiplexing possible.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    It is possible to deliver a sufficiently large number of electrical stimuli within a visual integration time to produce high quality artificial vision.

    “Finally, the approach relies on the assumption that it is possible to deliver a sufficiently large number of electrical stimuli within a visual integration time to produce high quality artificial vision.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Neural responses are generated independently across time steps.

    “The responses are stochastic with ri∼Bernoulli(pci) and we assume that responses are generated independently across time steps.”
15 of 15

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternative stimulation strategies have not been validated in vivo in humans using perceptually relevant pulse-train stimulation, and most do not address the substantial day-to-day variability in cortical responses that limits clinical reliability.

    “While alternative stimulation strategies have been proposed [25–39], none have been validated in vivo in humans using perceptually relevant pulse-train stimulation, and most do not address the substantial day-to-day variability in cortical responses that limits clinical reliability.”

    From Deep Learning–Based Control of Electrically Evoked Activity in Human Visual Cortex (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous attempts at electrically evoking targeted neural activity have shown varied success, often limited to simulations, retinal explants, or prefrontal cortex brain states in non-human primates, yet never in awake humans.

    “Previous attempts at electrically evoking targeted neural activity have shown varied success, often limited to simulations [33, 39], retinal explants [27], or prefrontal cortex brain states in non-human primates [49], yet never in awake humans.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Richard, 2015, Recognizing Retinal Ganglion Cells in the Dark, 2476

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, N. P., Phillips, A., Madugula, S., Lotlikar, A., Gogliettino, A. R., Hays, M. R., Grosberg, L., Brown, J., Dusi, A., Tandon, P., Hottowy, P., Dabrowski, W., Sher, A., Litke, A. M., Mitra, S., & Chichilnisky, E.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Department of Electrical Engineering
  • AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Shah, Nishal Pradeepbhai
Venue
eLife
Published
2024-11-07
Volume
13
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404142089
Cited by
15
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ALS Association
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (2146755)
  • National Science Foundation (1828993, NSF/CRCNS)
  • National Eye Institute (F30-EY-030776-03, F31-EY-033636, R01-EY021271, R01-EY029247, P30-EY019005)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH-020016)
  • The Fondation Bertarelli
  • The Stanford Neurosciences Graduate Program
  • Polish Academy of Sciences (DEC-2013/10/M/NZ4/00268)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
neurostimulation, retinal prosthesis, vision restoration, multi-electrode stimulation, spatial multiplexing, stimulus reconstruction, retinal ganglion cells, closed-loop stimulation, sensory recovery, macaque retina, rat retina
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Macaca, Macaca mulatta, Photic Stimulation, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Rats, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review