Cited by 97DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryCancer therapeutics and mechanismsMetal complexes synthesis and properties

Transcription-associated topoisomerase 2α (TOP2A) activity is a major effector of cytotoxicity induced by G-quadruplex ligands

Open access
Bossaert, Madeleine, Pipier, Angélique, Riou, Jean-Francois, Noirot, Céline, Nguyên, Linh-Trang, Serre, Remy-Felix, Bouchez, Olivier, Defrancq, Eric +3 more·2021·eLife

Abstract

G-quadruplexes (G4) are non-canonical DNA structures found in the genome of most species including human. Small molecules stabilizing these structures, called G4 ligands, have been identified and, for some of them, shown to induce cytotoxic DNA double-strand breaks. Through the use of an unbiased genetic approach, we identify here topoisomerase 2α (TOP2A) as a major effector of cytotoxicity induced by two clastogenic G4 ligands, pyridostatin and CX-5461, the latter molecule currently undergoing phase I/II clinical trials in oncology. We show that both TOP2 activity and transcription account for DNA break production following G4 ligand treatments. In contrast, clastogenic activity of these G4 ligands is countered by topoisomerase 1 (TOP1), which limits co-transcriptional G4 formation, and by factors promoting transcriptional elongation. Altogether our results support that clastogenic G4 ligands act as DNA structure-driven TOP2 poisons at transcribed regions bearing G4 structures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.65184

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent genome-wide investigations underscore that these effects are not confined to promotors, but are rather observed across the genome.

    “Recent genome-wide investigations underscore that these effects are not confined to promotors, but are rather observed across the genome (68–70).”

    From G-quadruplex-mediated genomic instability drives SNVs in cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says G-quadruplexes are present throughout the human genome and reports genome-wide associations with RNA polymerase pausing and R-loop-forming regions. The paper also describes G4-ligand effects at transcribed genomic regions, but the passages do not establish that those effects were observed across the genome rather than at promoters alone. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bossaert, M., Pipier, A., Riou, J.-F., Noirot, C., Nguyên, L.-T., Serre, R.-F., Bouchez, O., Defrancq, E., Calsou, P., Britton, S., & Gomez, D.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Structure et Instabilité des Génomes, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • INRAE, US 1426, GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul, Castanet-Tolosan, France
  • Département de Chimie Moléculaire, UMR CNRS 5250, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
  • Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
Corresponding author
  • Calsou, Patrick
  • Britton, Sébastien
Venue
eLife
Published
2021-06-28
Volume
10
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177139153
Cited by
97
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE18-0002-01, ANR-16-CE11-0006-01, ANR-10-INBS-09)
  • Cancéropôle Grand Ouest (Emergence funding "CX-Break")
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer (Equipe Labellisée 2018)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Metal complexes synthesis and properties
Keywords
G-quadruplex ligands, TOP2A, DNA double-strand breaks, clastogenicity, pyridostatin, CX-5461, topoisomerase I, transcription elongation, cytotoxicity
MeSH terms
Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins, RNA-Seq, Aminoquinolines, Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Colony-Forming Units Assay, DNA Topoisomerases, Type II, DNA Topoisomerases, Type I, Humans, Naphthyridines, Picolinic Acids, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, RNA Interference, Cell Proliferation, Benzothiazoles, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, G-Quadruplexes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review