Cited by 23Anatomy and Medical Technology3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageDigital Imaging in Medicine

Photogrammetry Applied to Neurosurgery: A Literature Review

Open access
Trandzhiev, Martin, Vezirska, Donika I, Maslarski, Ivan, Milev, Milko D, Laleva, Lili, Nakov, Vladimir, Cornelius, Jan F, Spiriev, Toma·2023·Cureus

Abstract

Photogrammetry refers to the process of creating 3D models and taking measurements through the use of photographs. Photogrammetry has many applications in neurosurgery, such as creating 3D anatomical models and diagnosing and evaluating head shape and posture deformities. This review aims to summarize the uses of the technique in the neurosurgical practice and showcase the systems and software required for its implementation. A literature review was done in the online database PubMed. Papers were searched using the keywords "photogrammetry", "neurosurgery", "neuroanatomy", "craniosynostosis" and "scoliosis". The identified articles were later put through primary (abstracts and titles) and secondary (full text) screening for eligibility for inclusion. In total, 86 articles were included in the review from 315 papers identified. The review showed that the main uses of photogrammetry in the field of neurosurgery are related to the creation of 3D models of complex neuroanatomical structures and surgical approaches, accompanied by the uses for diagnosis and evaluation of patients with structural deformities of the head and trunk, such as craniosynostosis and scoliosis. Additionally, three instances of photogrammetry applied for more specific aims, namely, cervical spine surgery, skull-base surgery, and radiosurgery, were identified. Information was extracted on the software and systems used to execute the method. With the development of the photogrammetric method, it has become possible to create accurate 3D models of physical objects and analyze images with dedicated software. In the neurosurgical setting, this has translated into the creation of anatomical teaching models and surgical 3D models as well as the evaluation of head and spine deformities. Through those applications, the method has the potential to facilitate the education of residents and medical students and the diagnosis of patient pathologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.46251

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The wide range of available scanning systems and algorithms, in the absence of robust comparative studies, presents a barrier to standardisation and widespread clinical acceptance.

    “Finally, the wide range of available scanning systems and algorithms, in the absence of robust comparative studies, presents a barrier to standardisation and widespread clinical acceptance [72].”

    From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Review (page not provided) describes several camera systems and software packages and says no study compared the camera systems used for cranial-deformity evaluation, leaving no consensus on the most suitable one. It does not establish that this lack of comparisons is a barrier to widespread clinical acceptance, or extend the comparison finding to all scanning algorithms. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [58]Non-ionizing method of screening adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in schoolchildren Cien Saude Colet Aroeira RM Leal JS Pertence AE Casas EB Greco M 523 534 24 2019 30726384

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trandzhiev, M., Vezirska, D. I., Maslarski, I., Milev, M. D., Laleva, L., Nakov, V., Cornelius, J. F., & Spiriev, T.
Affiliations
Lozenetz Hospital (BG)
Corresponding author
Trandzhiev, Martin
Venue
Cureus
Published
2023-09-30
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
e46251-e46251
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387217769
Cited by
23
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
Keywords
photogrammetry, neurosurgery, 3D anatomical models, craniosynostosis, scoliosis, surgical planning, cervical spine surgery, skull base surgery, radiosurgery, medical education, photogrammetric software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review