Cited by 25Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Intracranial volume (ICV) in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis measured by 3D photocephalometry: A new perspective on a controversial issue

Seeberger, R., Hoffmann, J., Freudlsperger, C., Berger, M., Bodem, J., Horn, D., Engel, M.·2016·Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Background There are still controversies regarding the intracranial volumes in patients with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis compared to a healthy population. This study aimed to compare the intracranial volume of children with sagittal synostosis and scaphocephaly to an age- and gender-matched control cohort using three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry.Methods 62 boys and nine girls with sagittal craniosynostosis were included in this study. The intracranial volume was measured at the first clinical presentation. However, 3D photogrammetry was performed at children not younger than 3 months. The 3D photogrammetric data of 547 healthy boys and 287 healthy girls between the ages of 3-10 month was analyzed to establish an age- and gender-matched control group.Results Male patients with sagittal synostosis showed a significantly reduced intracranial volume compared to the reference group. For female patients, the intracranial volume was slightly lower compared to the norm group, but not significantly.Conclusions Male children with sagittal synostosis showed significantly decreased intracranial volume between the age of 3 and 10 months compared to an age- and gender-matched control group. Female patients in the same age group presented a lower intracranial volume compared to the norm group. Measuring intracranial volume using 3D photogrammetry is a comparable and valuable alternative to CT scans that leads to a significant reduction of radiation exposure to the growing brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.023

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intracranial volume in ISS between the third and tenth months of life is lower than in children of the same age without craniosynostosis.

    “Other studies [20] have shown partially different results, namely that the intracranial volume in ISS between the third and tenth months of life is lower than in children of the same age without craniosynostosis [20].”

    From Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seeberger, R., Hoffmann, J., Freudlsperger, C., Berger, M., Bodem, J., Horn, D., & Engel, M.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Engel, M.
Venue
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
626-631
ISSN
1010-5182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2281294563
Cited by
25
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
sagittal craniosynostosis, intracranial volume, scaphocephaly, 3D photogrammetry, sex differences, infants, radiation dose reduction, cranial growth
MeSH terms
Cephalometry, Craniosynostoses, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Photogrammetry, Retrospective Studies, Software, Case-Control Studies, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review