Cited by 22Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

The value of three-dimensional photogrammetry in isolated sagittal synostosis: Impact of age and surgical technique on intracranial volume and cephalic index─a retrospective cohort study

Mertens, Christian, Wessel, Eline, Berger, Moritz, Ristow, Oliver, Hoffmann, Jürgen, Kansy, Katinka, Freudlsperger, Christian, Bächli, Heidrun +1 more·2017·Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intracranial volume (ICV) and cephalic index (CI) between two different techniques for surgical therapy of sagittal synostosis.Material and methods Between 2011 and 2015, all patients scheduled for surgical therapy of sagittal synostosis were consecutively enrolled. All patients younger than 6 months underwent early extended strip craniectomy (ESC group), and patients older than 6 months underwent late modified pi-procedure (MPP group). To measure ICV and CI, data acquisition was performed via three-dimensional photogrammetry, 1 day before (T0) and between 10 and 12 weeks after surgery (T1). Results were compared with an age-matched reference group of healthy children. Perioperative parameters, as duration of surgery and the amount of blood loss of both surgical procedures were analyzed.Results A total of 85 patients were enrolled. Of the patients, 48 underwent an extended strip craniotomy with parietal osteotomies and biparietal widening and 37 patients underwent a late modified pi-procedure. There was no significant difference between the ESC group and the MPP group regarding the efficacy of improving CI (p > 0.05). Both techniques were able to normalize CI and to improve head shape. ICV was normal compared to age-matched norm-groups with both techniques, pre- and postoperatively. However, duration of the surgical procedure and calculated blood loss were significantly lower in the ESC group (p < 0.05).Conclusion ESC and MPP were effective techniques to normalize cephalic index (CI) and improve head shape at their recommended time of surgery. Measurement of ICV and CI with 3D photogrammetry is a valid method to objectively evaluate patients before and after surgery without exposing pediatric patients to ionizing radiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.09.019

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mertens, C., Wessel, E., Berger, M., Ristow, O., Hoffmann, J., Kansy, K., Freudlsperger, C., Bächli, H., & Engel, M.
Affiliations
University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Engel, Michael
Venue
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
2010-2016
ISSN
1010-5182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2760177810
Cited by
22
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
sagittal synostosis, craniosynostosis, intracranial volume, cephalic index, 3D photogrammetry, surgical outcome assessment, blood loss, operative time
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Brain, Cephalometry, Craniosynostoses, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Organ Size, Photogrammetry, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review