Cited by 32Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionTechnostress in Professional SettingsCOVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing

Exploring the impact of security technologies on mental health: a comprehensive review

Open access
Malik, Adwait S, Acharya, Sourya, Humane, Sonal·2024·Cureus

Abstract

This comprehensive review explores the intricate relationship between security technologies and mental health. Security technologies, including physical security, cybersecurity, and surveillance measures, are integral components of our modern world, designed to protect individuals, organizations, and society from various threats. While they are vital in enhancing safety, they also have profound implications for mental well-being. The review delves into the positive impacts of security technologies, including their capacity to enhance personal safety, reduce anxiety and fear, and instill a sense of security. However, it also reveals the negative consequences, such as privacy invasion, surveillance-related stress, paranoia, and ethical concerns, which can erode mental health. User perception and trust are central to understanding how individuals experience security technologies. The review emphasizes the importance of ethical guidelines, user education, and technological advancements in mitigating negative impacts. By embracing an ethical-by-design approach, empowering users, and promoting public awareness, a balanced equilibrium between security and mental health can be achieved. The conclusion highlights the significance of ongoing research and interdisciplinary collaboration to navigate this intricate relationship effectively. By prioritizing ethical considerations and fostering a dialogue that values security and individual well-being, we can ensure a safer and more mentally healthy future in our technologically interconnected world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7759/cureus.53664

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fear of surveillance or loss of control over personal information can contribute to increased anxiety among students and staff, impacting their well-being.

    “The fear of surveillance or loss of control over personal information can contribute to increased anxiety among students and staff, thus impacting their well-being (Malik et al., 2024).”

    From Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence on student and academic well-being in higher education: a mini-review (2025) · cites this paper as Malik et al., 2024

    The Review passages on surveillance-related stress and perceived control say that surveillance and lack of control over personal information can heighten anxiety and harm well-being. Those passages discuss individuals generally, not students and staff specifically. The Review’s passage on educational facilities discusses students and staff, but describes security technologies as reducing their anxiety rather than examining the privacy-related fear claimed here. Page numbers were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [53]Cultural, social, and legal considerations. In: biometric recognition: challenges and opportunities Cultural, Social, and Legal Considerations. In: Biometric Recognition: Challenges and Opportunities National Research Council (US) Whither Biometrics Committee Washington (DC) National Academies Press (US) 2010 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219893/ 25032357

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malik, A. S., Acharya, S., & Humane, S.
Affiliations
Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Humane, Sonal
Venue
Cureus
Published
2024-02-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
e53664-e53664
ISSN
2168-8184 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391571276
Cited by
32
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cureus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Keywords
security technology, mental health, physical security, cybersecurity, surveillance, privacy violations, paranoia, user perception, fear and anxiety, personal safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review