Cited by 21Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementEcology and biodiversity studies

Wolves, elk and willow on Yellowstone National Park's northern range

Open access
Beyer, Hawthorne L·2006·University of Alberta Library

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.7939/r3-8j39-hy05

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elk avoided riparian areas during times when wolves were active.

    “Studies using tracking collars found that elk avoided riparian areas during times when wolves were active”

    From Tall willow thickets return to northern Yellowstone (2020) · cites this paper as Beyer 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beyer, H. L.
Corresponding author
Beyer, Hawthorne L
Venue
University of Alberta Library
Publisher
University of Alberta Library
Published
2006
OpenAlex
W2183483415
Cited by
21
References
11
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
wolf, elk, willow, predator-prey interactions, elk browsing, riparian vegetation, Yellowstone National Park, Northern Range, wildlife ecology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review