Cited by 150Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records SystemsPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

A Comparison of Care at E-visits and Physician Office Visits for Sinusitis and Urinary Tract Infection

Open access
Mehrotra, Ateev, Paone, Suzanne, Martich, G. Daniel, Albert, Steven M., Shevchik, Grant J.·2013·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Internet capabilities create the opportunity for eVisits, in which physicians and patients interact virtually instead of face-to-face. In an eVisit, a patient logs into her secure personal health record internet portal and answers a series of questions about her condition. This written information is sent to the physician, who makes a diagnosis, orders necessary care, puts a note in the patient’s electronic medical record (EMR), and replies to the patient via the secure portal within several hours. eVisits are offered by numerous health systems and are commonly reimbursed by health plans.1,2 eVisits typically focus on care for acute conditions, such as minor infections. There are several potential advantages of eVisits, including convenience and efficiency (avoiding travel and time) and lower costs.3 Further, eVisits can be provided by the patient’s primary care physician (PCP) instead of a physician at an emergency department or urgent care center. The main concerns about eVisits center on quality issues: whether physicians can make accurate diagnoses without a face-to-face interview or physical exam,4 whether use of tests and follow-up visits is appropriate, and whether antibiotics might be overprescribed. No studies have characterized the differences between eVisits and office visits. To fill this knowledge gap, we compared the care at eVisits and office visits for two conditions--sinusitis and urinary tract infection (UTI).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.305

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehrotra, A., Paone, S., Martich, G. D., Albert, S. M., & Shevchik, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • UPMC Health System (US)
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2013-01-14
Volume
173
Issue
1
Pages
72
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054939175
Cited by
150
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000146)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI097759)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2 RR24154-6, KL2RR024154)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
e-visits, telemedicine, physician visits, sinusitis, urinary tract infection, acute infection, primary care, antibiotic overprescription, diagnostic accuracy, health care costs, quality of care
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Office Visits, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Physical Examination, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Product Line Management, Sinusitis, Urinary Tract Infections, Remote Consultation, Internet, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review