Cited by 116Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Weight Loss in Overweight Adults and the Long-term Risk of Hypertension: The Framingham Study

Moore, Lynn L., Visioni, Agostino J., Qureshi, M. Mustafa, Bradlee, M. Loring, Ellison, R. Curtis, D’Agostino, Ralph·2005·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies address long-term effects of weight loss on risk of incident hypertension among overweight adults. METHODS: We evaluated weight loss among 623 overweight (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters] >/=25) middle-aged (aged 30-49 years) and 605 overweight older (aged 50-65 years) adults in Framingham, Mass. Subjects were classified first according to amount of weight lost over 4 years: (1) weight changed by less than 1.8 kg (stable weight), (2) lost 1.8 to less than 3.6 kg, (3) lost 3.6 to less than 6.8 kg, and (4) lost 6.8 kg or more. We also classified weight loss according to whether it was sustained during the next 4 years. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex, education, baseline body mass index, height, activity, smoking, and alcohol intake, weight loss of 6.8 kg or more led to a 21% to 29% reduction in long-term hypertension risk. After adjusting for cancer or cardiovascular disease occurring during follow-up, weight loss of 6.8 kg or more led to a 28% reduction in risk (relative risk [95% confidence interval], 0.72 [0.49-1.05]) for middle-aged adults and a 37% reduction (0.63 [0.42-0.95]) for older adults. Sustained weight loss led to a 22% reduction in hypertension risk (0.78 [0.60-1.03]) among middle-aged and a 26% reduction (0.74 [0.56-0.97]) in older adults. This risk reduction was strengthened by adjustment for prevalent cancer or cardiovascular disease during follow-up. CONCLUSION: A modest weight loss, particularly when sustained, substantially lowers the long-term risk of hypertension in overweight adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.165.11.1298

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore, L. L., Visioni, A. J., Qureshi, M. M., Bradlee, M. L., Ellison, R. C., & D’Agostino, R.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2005-06-13
Volume
165
Issue
11
Pages
1298
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053159513
Cited by
116
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01‐HC25195)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight loss, overweight, hypertension, sustained weight loss, body mass index, middle-aged adults, older adults, cancer, cardiovascular disease, Framingham Heart Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Massachusetts, Obesity, Risk, Time Factors, Weight Loss, Incidence, Overnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review