The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Single-Question Screening Test for Drug Use in Primary Care
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Drug use (illicit drug use and nonmedical use of prescription drugs) is common but underrecognized in primary care settings. We validated a single-question screening test for drug use and drug use disorders in primary care. METHODS: Adult patients recruited from primary care waiting rooms were asked the single screening question, "How many times in the past year have you used an illegal drug or used a prescription medication for nonmedical reasons?" A response of at least 1 time was considered positive for drug use. They were also asked the 10-item Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10). The reference standard was the presence or absence of current (past year) drug use or a drug use disorder (abuse or dependence) as determined by a standardized diagnostic interview. Drug use was also determined by oral fluid testing for common drugs of abuse. RESULTS: Of 394 eligible primary care patients, 286 (73%) completed the interview. The single screening question was 100% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.6%-100%) and 73.5% specific (95% CI, 67.7%-78.6%) for the detection of a drug use disorder. It was less sensitive for the detection of self-reported current drug use (92.9%; 95% CI, 86.1%-96.5%) and drug use detected by oral fluid testing or self-report (81.8%; 95% CI, 72.5%-88.5%). Test characteristics were similar to those of the DAST-10 and were affected very little by participant demographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: The single screening question accurately identified drug use in this sample of primary care patients, supporting the usefulness of this brief screen in primary care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Group, W. A. W. (2002) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00185.x · Cited by 1,982
Primary Care: Is There Enough Time for Prevention?
Yarnall, K. S. H., Pollak, K. I., Østbye, T., Krause, K. M., & Michener, J. L. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.4.635 · Cited by 1,641 · cited 1×
“Time constraints in the primary care setting have been cited as a reason for failure to provide screening and prevention in general (according to one estimate, providing all recommended preventive services to an average primary care panel would require 7.4 hours out of each work day)18.”
BackgroundInfluentialBerman, A. H., Bergman, H., Palmstierna, T., & Schlyter, F. (2005) · European Addiction Research · doi:10.1159/000081413 · Cited by 977
A comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test
Yudko, E., Lozhkina, O., & Fouts, A. (2007) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.08.002 · Cited by 906
Madras, B. K., Compton, W. M., Avula, D., Stegbauer, T., Stein, J. B., & Clark, H. W. (2009) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.08.003 · Cited by 663
Kessler, R. C., Abelson, J., Demler, O., Escobar, J. I., Gibbon, M., Guyer, M. E., Howes, M. J., Jin, R., Vega, W. A., Walters, E. E., et al. (2004) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.169 · Cited by 489
Primary Care Validation of a Single-Question Alcohol Screening Test
Smith, P. C., Schmidt, S. M., Allensworth-Davies, D., & Saitz, R. (2009) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0928-6 · Cited by 416
Self-citationOral fluid testing for drugs of abuse
Bosker, W. M., & Huestis, M. A. (2009) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.108670 · Cited by 378
A two-item conjoint screen for alcohol and other drug problems.
Brown, R. L., Leonard, T., Saunders, L. A., & Papasouliotis, O. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 237
Cited by
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016
Dowell, D., Haegerich, T. M., & Chou, R. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1464 · Cited by 5,161
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain — United States, 2016
Dowell, D., Haegerich, T. M., & Chou, R. (2016) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1 · Cited by 2,697
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain — United States, 2022
Dowell, D., Ragan, K. R., Jones, C. M., Baldwin, G. T., & Chou, R. (2022) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1 · Cited by 1,886
Opioid Abuse in Chronic Pain — Misconceptions and Mitigation Strategies
Volkow, N. D., & McLellan, A. T. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1507771 · Cited by 1,305
Management of opioid use disorder in the USA: present status and future directions
Blanco, C., & Volkow, N. D. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33078-2 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, P. C., Schmidt, S. M., Allensworth-Davies, D., & Saitz, R.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-07-12
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1155-60
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171293769
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Single-Question Screening Test for Drug Use in Primary Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.140
- The paper
- Smith, P. C., Schmidt, S. M., Allensworth-Davies, D., & Saitz, R. (2010). A Single-Question Screening Test for Drug Use in Primary Care. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.