Cited by 1,982Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility

Open access
Group, WHO ASSIST Working·2002·Addiction

Abstract

Aims: The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) was developed for the World Health Organization (WHO) by an international group of substance abuse researchers to detect psychoactive substance use and related problems in primary care patients. This report describes the new instrument as well as a study of its reliability and feasibility. Setting: The study was conducted at participating sites in Australia, Brazil, Ireland, India, Israel, the Palestinian Territories, Puerto Rico, the United Kingdom and Zimbabwe. Sixty per cent of the sample was recruited from alcohol and drug abuse treatment facilities; the remainder was drawn from general medical settings and psychiatric facilities. Methods: The study was concerned primarily with test item reliability, using a simple test–retest procedure to determine whether subjects would respond consistently to the same items when presented in an interview format on two different occasions. Qualitative and quantitative data were also collected to evaluate the feasibility of the screening items and rating format. Participants: A total of 236 volunteer participants completed test and retest interviews at nine collaborating sites. Slightly over half of the sample (53.6%) was male. The mean age of the sample was 34 years and they had completed, on average, 10 years of education. Results: The average test–retest reliability coefficients (kappas) ranged from a high of 0.90 (consistency of reporting ‘ever’ use of substance) to a low of 0.58 (regretted what was done under influence of substance). The average kappas for substance classes ranged from 0.61 for sedatives to 0.78 for opioids. In general, the reliabilities were in the range of good to excellent, with the following items demonstrating the highest kappas across all drug classes: use in the last 3 months, preoccupied with drug use, concern expressed by others, troubled by problems related to drug use, intravenous drug use. Qualitative data collected at the end of the retest interview suggested that the questions were not difficult to answer and were consistent with patients’ expectations for a health interview. The data were used to guide the selection of a smaller set of items that can serve as the basis for more extensive validation research. Conclusion: The ASSIST items are reliable and feasible to use as part of an international screening test. Further evaluation of the screening test should be conducted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00185.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The WHO ASSIST V3 was developed and validated in primary care public clinics in high-, middle- and low-income countries including in Southern Africa.

    “We used this instrument for assessment because it was designed for medical settings, and because it was developed and validated in primary care public clinics in high-, middle- and low-income countries including in Southern Africa (WHO ASSIST Working Group, 2002).”

    From Effectiveness of Nurse-Practitioner-Delivered Brief Motivational Intervention for Young Adult Alcohol and Drug Use in Primary Care in South Africa: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2014) · cites this paper as WHO ASSIST Working Group, 2002

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says ASSIST was developed for primary-care patients and studied at international sites including Zimbabwe. But the Discussion (page unavailable) says this study tested ASSIST 1.0 and 2.0, did not assess their concurrent or predictive validity, and did not evaluate the preliminary instrument under typical primary-care conditions. The paper therefore does not support the claim that ASSIST V3 was validated in primary-care public clinics across the stated income groups. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Allen, J. P., Litten, R. Z., Fertig, J. B. & Babor, T. F. (1997) A review of research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test 13600443, 2002, 9, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00185.x by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [14/01/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License (AUDIT). Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 21, 613-619. · DOI
  2. Babor, T. F. (2002) Is there a need for an international screening test? The Middle East as a case in point. In: Isralowitz, R. & Rawson, R., eds. Drug Problems, Cross-Cultural Policy and Program Development, pp. 165-179. Westport, CT: Auburn House.
  3. Babor, T. F. & Del Boca, F. K. (1992) Just the facts. Enhancing measurement of alcohol consumption using self-report methods. In: Litten, R. Z. & Allen, J. P., eds. Measuring Alcohol Consumption Psychosocial and Biochemical Methods, pp. 3-19. New Jersey: Humana Press.
  4. Brown, R. L. & Rounds, L. A. (1995) Conjoint screening ques- tionnaires for alcohol and other drug abuse: criterion validity in a primary care practice. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 94, 135-140.
  5. MacAndrew, C. (1965) The differentiation of male alcoholic out- patients from non-alcoholic psychiatric outpatients by means of the MMPI. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 26, 238-246.
  6. McPherson, T. L. & Hersch, R. (2000) Brief substance use screening instruments for primary care settings: a review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 193-202.
  7. Sudman, S. & Bradburn, N. M. (1982) Asking Questions. A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. United Nations Drug Control Programme (UNDCP) (1997) World Drug Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Ustun, T. B. & Sartorius, N. (1995) Mental Illness in General Health Care An International Study. London: John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Wolff, K., Farrell, M., Marsden, J., Monteiro, M., Ali, R., Welch, S. & Strang, J. (1999) A review of biological indicators of illicit drug use, practical considerations and clinical usefulness. Addiction, 94, 1279-1298.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Group, W. A. W.
Affiliations
UConn Health (US)
Corresponding author
Group, WHO ASSIST Working
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08-30
Volume
97
Issue
9
Pages
1183-1194
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2617126691
Cited by
1,982
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 132 · 2025: 176 · 2024: 187 · 2023: 168 · 2022: 184 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 135 · 2019: 119 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 49
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HRB National Drugs Library (Health Research Board) (acceptedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • University of Connecticut
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA03510-24, AA-03510)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
ASSIST, substance use screening, alcohol consumption, smoking, drug use, test-retest reliability, screening tool development, primary care, international validation
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Research Design, Sensitivity and Specificity, Smoking, Substance Abuse Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review