Cited by 2,262Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesDeep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Frontal-Subcortical Circuits and Human Behavior

Cummings, J. L.·1993·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This synthetic review was performed to demonstrate the utility of frontal-subcortical circuits in the explanation of a wide range of human behavioral disorders. DATA SOURCES: Reports of patients with degenerative disorders or focal lesions involving frontal lobe or linked subcortical structures were chosen from the English literature. Individual case reports and group investigations from peer-reviewed journals were evaluated. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they described patient behavior in detail or reported pertinent neuropsy-chological findings and had compelling evidence of a disorder affecting frontal-subcortical circuits. DATA EXTRACTION: Information was used if the report from which it was taken met study selection criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Five parallel segregated circuits link the frontal lobe and subcortical structures. Clinical syndromes observed with frontal lobe injury are recapitulated with lesions of subcortical member structures of the circuits. Each prefrontal circuit has a signature behavioral syndrome: executive function deficits occur with lesions of the dorsolateral prefrontal circuit, disinhibition with lesions of the orbitofrontal circuit, and apathy with injury to the anterior cingulate circuit. Depression, mania, and obsessive-compulsive disorder may also be mediated by frontal-subcotical circuits. Movement disorders identify involvement of the basal ganglia component of frontal-subcortical circuits. CONCLUSIONS: Frontal-subcortical circuits mediate many aspects of human behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540080076020

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,262

Metadata

Authors
Cummings, J. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Cummings, J. L.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1993-08-01
Volume
50
Issue
8
Pages
873-880
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038012828
Cited by
2,262
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 86
FWCI
27.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
Keywords
frontal-subcortical circuits, frontal lobe lesions, subcortical lesions, executive dysfunction, disinhibition, apathy, depression, mania, obsessive-compulsive disorder, basal ganglia, movement disorders, behavioral disorders, neuropsychology
MeSH terms
Behavior, Brain Diseases, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Neural Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review