Cited by 41Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

D2 Dopamine Receptor Alleles Do Not Influence Severity of Tourette's Syndrome: Results From Four Large Kindreds

Gelernter, Joel·1994·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the recently proposed hypothesis that the A1 allele of the Taq I polymorphic system at the D2 dopamine receptor gene (DRD2) influences the severity of Tourette's syndrome (TS). We have previously demonstrated that DRD2 is not linked to TS, establishing that it cannot be the major locus determining the susceptibility to develop TS. METHOD: We studied alleles at the DRD2 A system in patients with TS or chronic multiple tics in four extended kindreds segregating TS. If this allelic system at DRD2 is associated with severity of TS, then among affected family members, those with the A1 allele should have more severe disease than those without it. Severity of disease was compared in affected members of the kindreds with A1 alleles and in those without A1 alleles. RESULTS: We evaluated disease severity in two ways. First, we evaluated 17 individuals from two families using a derivative of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale composed of subscales concerning number, frequency, and severity of motor and phonic tics, rated separately. We divided this sample (n = 17, nine with TS and eight with chronic multiple tics) by genotype at the A1/A2 system. The heterozygotes (n = 7) had an average severity score of 11.3; the A2 homozygotes had an average severity score of 14.2. (There were no A1 homozygotes.) Second, we evaluated 47 individuals from two different families (all with TS) using the TS symptomatology evaluation. We compared severity scores for these individuals by genotype at the A1/A2 system. The heterozygotes (n = 24) had a mean severity score of 3.0, and the A2 homozygotes (N = 21) had a mean severity score of 3.7. CONCLUSION: Our data do not support alleles at the A system of DRD2 as a factor associated with severity of TS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540160099012

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gelernter, J.
Affiliations
Veterans Health Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Gelernter, Joel
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1994-04-01
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
397
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094055942
Cited by
41
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH MH00931, NIMH MH-00508, NIMH MH30929)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
Tourette syndrome, dopamine D2 receptor, DRD2 gene, TaqI polymorphism, A1 allele, disease severity, tic severity, family segregation, genotype-phenotype correlation
MeSH terms
Alleles, Tourette Syndrome, Heterozygote, Homozygote, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Severity of Illness Index, Receptors, Dopamine D2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review