The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sunlight and Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Beaver Dam Eye Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of sunlight exposure with age-related maculopathy. This was investigated in the population-based Beaver Dam Eye Study. DESIGN: In this cross-sectional population-based study, questionnaire data about sunlight exposure were obtained. Stereoscopic color fundus photographs were graded to determine the presence of age-related maculopathy. PARTICIPANTS: People aged 43 through 84 years who resided in Beaver Dam, Wis, between 1987 and 1988 were examined between 1988 and 1990. RESULTS: Light exposure was not associated with early age-related maculopathy in women. In men, after adjusting for age, the amount of time spent outdoors in summer was associated with increased retinal pigment (odds ratio [OR], 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 2.04). Wearing eyeglasses was inversely associated with increased retinal pigment (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97), and the use of hats and sunglasses was inversely associated with soft indistinct drusen (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.98). The amount of leisure time spent outdoors in summer was significantly associated with exudative macular degeneration (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.06 to 4.81) and late maculopathy (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.25). There were no associations between estimated ambient UV-B exposure and age-related maculopathy. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that exposure to sunlight may be associated with age-related maculopathy. However, longitudinal studies of these associations are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevalence of age-related maculopathy
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., & Linton, K. L. P. (1992) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31871-8 · Cited by 1,845
Senile macular degeneration: a case-control study
HYMAN, L. G., LILIENFELD, A. M., FERRIS, F. L., & FINE, S. L. (1983) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113629 · Cited by 587
Cited by
The Role of Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Beatty, S., Koh, H.-H., Phil, M., Henson, D., & Boulton, M. (2000) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00140-5 · Cited by 2,051
Prevalence of age-related maculopathy in Australia
Mitchell, P., Smith, W., Attebo, K., & Wang, J. J. (1995) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30846-9 · Cited by 1,062
Age-related macular degeneration: etiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies
Ambati, J., Ambati, B. K., Yoo, S. H., Ianchulev, S., & Adamis, A. P. (2003) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(03)00030-4 · Cited by 959
The epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration
Klein, R., Peto, T., Bird, A., & Vannewkirk, M. R. (2004) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.11.069 · Cited by 932
Risk factors associated with age-related macular degeneration
(2000) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00409-7 · Cited by 633
Metadata
- Authors
- Cruickshanks, K. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-04-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 514
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027716003
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.