The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the US Population
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American, and other racial/ethnic groups. DESIGN: A US nationally representative, population-based, cross-sectional study involving a total of 5553 persons aged 40 years and older from the 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The main outcome measure was AMD determined by the grading of 45° digital images from both eyes using a standardized protocol. RESULTS: In the civilian, noninstitutionalized, US population aged 40 years and older, the estimated prevalence of any AMD was 6.5% (95% confidence interval, 5.5-7.6) and the estimated prevalence of late AMD was 0.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.3). Non-Hispanic black persons aged 60 years and older had a statistically significantly lower prevalence of any AMD than non-Hispanic white persons aged 60 years and older (odds ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the prevalence of any AMD in the 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey was 6.5%, which is lower than the 9.4% prevalence reported in the 1988-1994 Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. While this finding might be explained in part by possible methodological differences, these estimates are consistent with a decreasing incidence of AMD and suggest important public health care implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Causes and Prevalence of Visual Impairment Among Adults in the UnitedStates
(2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.477 · Cited by 2,616
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Knudtson, M. D., Wong, T. Y., Cotch, M. F., Liu, K., Burke, G., Saad, M. F., & Jacobs, D. R. (2006) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.013 · Cited by 399
Self-citationRacial differences in the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration
Friedman, D. S., Katz, J., Bressler, N. M., Rahmani, B., & Tielsch, J. M. (1999) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90267-1 · Cited by 304
Knudtson, M. D., Klein, R., & Klein, B. E. K. (2006) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.103796 · Cited by 115
Self-citation
Cited by
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(2010) · Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_6177 · Cited by 2,087
Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Europe
Colijn, J. M., Buitendijk, G. H. S., Prokofyeva, E., Alves, D., Cachulo, M. L., Khawaja, A. P., Cougnard-Gregoire, A., Merle, B. M. J., Korb, C., Erke, M. G., et al. (2017) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.035 · Cited by 486
Deng, Y., Qiao, L., Du, M., Qu, C., Wan, L., Li, J., & Huang, L. (2022) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2021.02.009 · Cited by 411
Incidence of Legal Blindness From Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Denmark: Year 2000 to 2010
Bloch, S. B., Larsen, M., & Munch, I. C. (2012) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.016 · Cited by 377
Dysfunctional autophagy in RPE, a contributing factor in age-related macular degeneration
Golestaneh, N., Chu, Y., Xiao, Y.-Y., Stoleru, G. L., & Theos, A. C. (2017) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2016.453 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, R.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2011-01-10
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104764481
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 44.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the US Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.318
- The paper
- Klein, R. (2011). Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the US Population. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.