Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increased Caudate Dopamine D2 Receptor Availability as a Genetic Marker for Schizophrenia

Hirvonen, Jussi, van Erp, Theo G. M., Huttunen, Jukka, Aalto, Sargo, Någren, Kjell, Huttunen, Matti, Lönnqvist, Jouko, Kaprio, Jaakko, Hietala, Jarmo, Cannon, Tyrone D.·2005·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: Schizophrenia has a heritability of about 80%, but the detailed molecular genetic basis of the disorder has remained elusive. Relative hyperfunction of the subcortical dopamine system has been previously suggested to be one of the key pathophysiologic mechanisms in schizophrenic psychosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the contributions of genetic vulnerability for schizophrenia to the dopamine system in the human brain. DESIGN: Population-based twin cohort study. SETTING: Finland. PARTICIPANTS: Six monozygotic and 5 dizygotic unaffected co-twins of patients with schizophrenia were ascertained, along with 4 monozygotic and 3 dizygotic healthy control twins with no family history of psychotic disorders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Striatal dopamine D(2) receptor availability estimated with positron emission tomographic imaging and carbon 11 ((11)C)-labeled raclopride, and performance on neuropsychological tests sensitive to frontal lobe functioning and to schizophrenia vulnerability. RESULTS: Unaffected monozygotic co-twins had increased caudate D(2) density compared with unaffected dizygotic co-twins and healthy control twins. Higher D(2) receptor binding in caudate was associated with a poor performance on cognitive tasks related to schizophrenia vulnerability in the whole sample. CONCLUSIONS: The caudate dopamine D(2) receptor up-regulation is related to genetic risk for schizophrenia. Higher dopamine D(2) receptor density in caudate is also associated with poorer performance on cognitive tasks involving corticostriatal pathways. This finding suggests that caudate dopamine dysregulation is also a trait phenomenon related to psychosis vulnerability. This pattern of results provides a theoretical rationale for early pharmacologic intervention approaches using dopamine D(2) receptor blocking drugs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.371

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Hirvonen, J., van Erp, T. G. M., Huttunen, J., Aalto, S., Någren, K., Huttunen, M., Lönnqvist, J., Kaprio, J., Hietala, J., & Cannon, T. D.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2005-04-01
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
371
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112630389
Cited by
162
References
9
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Caudate Dopamine D2 Receptor Availability as a Genetic Marker for Schizophrenia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.371
The paper
Hirvonen, J., van Erp, T. G. M., Huttunen, J., Aalto, S., Någren, K., Huttunen, M., Lönnqvist, J., Kaprio, J., Hietala, J., & Cannon, T. D. (2005). Increased Caudate Dopamine D2 Receptor Availability as a Genetic Marker for Schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.371

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.