The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuropsychological Prediction of Conversion to Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: The likelihood of conversion to Alzheimer disease (AD) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the "optimal" early markers of conversion need to be established. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate conversion rates to AD in subtypes of MCI and to identify neuropsychological measures most predictive of the time to conversion. DESIGN: Patients were followed up semiannually and controls annually. Subtypes of MCI were determined by using demographically adjusted regression norms on neuropsychological tests. Survival analysis was used to identify the most predictive neuropsychological measures. SETTING: Memory disorders clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-eight patients reporting memory problems and 63 group-matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A consensus diagnosis of probable AD. RESULTS: At baseline, 108 patients met criteria for amnestic MCI: 87 had memory plus other cognitive domain deficits and 21 had pure memory deficits. The mean duration of follow-up for the 148 patients was 46.6 +/- 24.6 months. In 3 years, 32 (50.0%) of 64 amnestic-"plus" and 2 (10.0%) of 20 "pure" amnestic patients converted to AD (P = .001). In 148 patients, of 5 a priori predictors, the percent savings from immediate to delayed recall on the Selective Reminding Test and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Digit Symbol Test were the strongest predictors of time to conversion. From the entire neuropsychological test battery, a stepwise selection procedure retained 2 measures in the final model: total immediate recall on the Selective Reminding Test (odds ratio per 1-point decrease, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.14; P < .0001) and Digit Symbol Test coding (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.11; P = .01). The combined predictive accuracy of these 2 measures for conversion by 3 years was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Mild cognitively impaired patients with memory plus other cognitive domain deficits, rather than those with pure amnestic MCI, constituted the high-risk group. Deficits in verbal memory and psychomotor speed/executive function abilities strongly predicted conversion to AD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.3.303 · Cited by 8,980
Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E., & Roth, M. (1968) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.114.512.797 · Cited by 4,117
Grundman, M. (2004) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.61.1.59 · Cited by 972
Amnestic MCI or prodromal Alzheimer's disease?
Dubois, B., & Albert, M. L. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00710-0 · Cited by 543
Neuropsychological detection and characterization of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
Jacobs, D. M., Sano, M., Dooneief, G., Marder, K., Bell, K. L., & Stern, Y. (1995) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.45.5.957 · Cited by 409
Self-citationManly, J. J., Bell-McGinty, S., Tang, M.-X., Schupf, N., Stern, Y., & Mayeux, R. (2005) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.62.11.1739 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Cited by
Mitchell, A. J., & Shiri‐Feshki, M. (2009) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01326.x · Cited by 1,659
Quantification of Five Neuropsychological Approaches to Defining Mild Cognitive Impairment
Jak, A. J., Bondi, M. W., Delano-Wood, L., Wierenga, C., Corey-Bloom, J., Salmon, D. P., & Delis, D. C. (2009) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/jgp.0b013e31819431d5 · Cited by 823
Comparing predictors of conversion and decline in mild cognitive impairment
Landau, S. M., Harvey, D., Madison, C. M., Reiman, E. M., Foster, N. L., Aisen, P. S., Petersen, R. C., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., Jack, C. R., et al. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181e8e8b8 · Cited by 616
Language performance in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A comparative review
Taler, V., & Phillips, N. A. (2008) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390701550128 · Cited by 529
Measuring cognitive reserve based on the decomposition of episodic memory variance
Reed, B. R., Mungas, D., Farias, S. T., Harvey, D., Beckett, L., Widaman, K., Hinton, L., & DeCarli, C. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq154 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Tabert, M. H., Manly, J. J., Liu, X., Pelton, G. H., Rosenblum, S., Jacobs, M., Zamora, D., Goodkind, M., Bell, K., Stern, Y., & Devanand, D. P.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 916
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152284561
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychological Prediction of Conversion to Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.916
- The paper
- Tabert, M. H., Manly, J. J., Liu, X., Pelton, G. H., Rosenblum, S., Jacobs, M., Zamora, D., Goodkind, M., Bell, K., Stern, Y., & Devanand, D. P. (2006). Neuropsychological Prediction of Conversion to Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.916
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.