The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender Differences in the Salaries of Physician Researchers
Abstract
CONTEXT: It is unclear whether male and female physician researchers who perform similar work are currently paid equally. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether salaries differ by gender in a relatively homogeneous cohort of physician researchers and, if so, to determine if these differences are explained by differences in specialization, productivity, or other factors. DESIGN AND SETTING: A US nationwide postal survey was sent in 2009-2010 to assess the salary and other characteristics of a relatively homogeneous population of physicians. From all 1853 recipients of National Institutes of Health (NIH) K08 and K23 awards in 2000-2003, we contacted the 1729 who were alive and for whom we could identify a mailing address. PARTICIPANTS: The survey achieved a 71% response rate. Eligibility for the present analysis was limited to the 800 physicians who continued to practice at US academic institutions and reported their current annual salary. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A linear regression model of self-reported current annual salary was constructed considering the following characteristics: gender, age, race, marital status, parental status, additional graduate degree, academic rank, leadership position, specialty, institution type, region, institution NIH funding rank, change of institution since K award, K award type, K award funding institute, years since K award, grant funding, publications, work hours, and time spent in research. RESULTS: The mean salary within our cohort was $167,669 (95% CI, $158,417-$176,922) for women and $200,433 (95% CI, $194,249-$206,617) for men. Male gender was associated with higher salary (+$13,399; P = .001) even after adjustment in the final model for specialty, academic rank, leadership positions, publications, and research time. Peters-Belson analysis (use of coefficients derived from regression model for men applied to women) indicated that the expected mean salary for women, if they retained their other measured characteristics but their gender was male, would be $12,194 higher than observed. CONCLUSION: Gender differences in salary exist in this select, homogeneous cohort of mid-career academic physicians, even after adjustment for differences in specialty, institutional characteristics, academic productivity, academic rank, work hours, and other factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets
Oaxaca, R. (1973) · International Economic Review · doi:10.2307/2525981 · Cited by 8,463
Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates
Blinder, A. S. (1973) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.2307/144855 · Cited by 6,922
Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?
Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/511799 · Cited by 2,525
Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design
Willis, G. (2004) · Cited by 1,934
Understanding the ‘Family Gap’ in Pay for Women with Children
Waldfogel, J. (1998) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.12.1.137 · Cited by 865
Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide
Babcock, L., & Laschever, S. (2003) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691212845 · Cited by 843
Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women.
Kleinberg, S. J., & Goldin, C. (1991) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233578 · Cited by 838
Women in science: career processes and outcomes
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3400 · Cited by 834
Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A., & Ritzke, D. (1999) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1023/a:1018839203698 · Cited by 736
Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women.
Lehrer, S., & Goldin, C. (1991) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2165176 · Cited by 612
Cited by
Sex Differences in Physician Salary in US Public Medical Schools
Jena, A. B., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3284 · Cited by 641
Butkus, R., Serchen, J., Moyer, D. V., Bornstein, S. S., Hingle, S. T., & for the Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians* (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m17-3438 · Cited by 322
Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study
Lerchenmueller, M. J., Sorenson, O., & Jena, A. B. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l6573 · Cited by 211
Physician work hours and the gender pay gap—evidence from primary care.
Ganguli, I., Sheridan, B., Gray, J., Chernew, M., Rosenthal, M. B., & Neprash, H. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa2013804 · Cited by 173
Carapinha, R., Ortiz-Walters, R., McCracken, C. M., Hill, E. V., & Reede, J. Y. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001284 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Jagsi, R., Griffith, K. A., Stewart, A., Sambuco, D., DeCastro, R., & Ubel, P. A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2012-06-13
- Volume
- 307
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2410-7
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2162688898
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 44.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender Differences in the Salaries of Physician Researchers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2012.6183
- The paper
- Jagsi, R., Griffith, K. A., Stewart, A., Sambuco, D., DeCastro, R., & Ubel, P. A. (2012). Gender Differences in the Salaries of Physician Researchers. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.6183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.