Cited by 9Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrailty in Older Adults

Obesity in the sarcopenia era

Kritchevsky, S. B.·2014·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

With the coining of the term “sarcopenia,” lean body mass has been a major focus of aging research for the past 25 years. The motivating idea is that weakness, a hallmark of physical disability, is determined by skeletal muscle mass. Therefore, a logical strategy to prevent disability would be to slow or reverse age-related decreases in muscle mass (1). However, evidence shows that the situation is more nuanced than originally expected. In community-dwelling older adults, the linkage between lean mass and strength is not especially strong, and some interventions that are effective in increasing lean mass do not appear to affect strength (2,3). Furthermore, intentional weight loss in obese older adults does not necessarily reduce muscle strength, despite significant reductions in muscle mass (4). In contrast to what might be predicted by the sarcopenia hypothesis, there have been five moderate to large clinical trials showing that weight loss improves physical performance and that this effect is additive to the benefits of exercise (5–9). Furthermore, the degree of functional improvement is correlated with the extent of adipose tissue loss (10). The benefits of physical activity seem to be blunted in obese older adults (11), and high levels of adiposity accelerate aging-related loss of lean mass (12). Concerns that intentional weight loss might predispose overweight or obese older persons to a higher mortality risk appear unwarranted (13).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glt185

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kritchevsky, S. B.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Kritchevsky, S. B.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2013-11-27
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
61-62
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2104568183
Cited by
9
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
obesity, sarcopenia, lean body mass, muscle strength, older adults, weight loss, physical performance, adipose tissue loss, physical activity, disability prevention, aging
MeSH terms
Aging, Disability Evaluation, Humans, Obesity, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review