Cited by 241Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSodium Intake and Health

Effect of a Community Health Worker–Led Multicomponent Intervention on Blood Pressure Control in Low-Income Patients in Argentina: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
He, Jiang, Irazola, Vilma, Mills, Katherine T., Poggio, Rosana, Beratarrechea, Andrea, Dolan, Jacquelyn, Chen, Chung-Shiuan, Gibbons, Luz +9 more·2017·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Despite extensive knowledge of hypertension treatment, the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension is high and increasing in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To test whether a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention would improve blood pressure (BP) control among low-income patients with hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cluster randomized trial was conducted in 18 centers for primary health care within a national public system providing free medications and health care to uninsured patients in Argentina. A total of 1432 low-income adult patients with uncontrolled hypertension were recruited between June 2013 and April 2015 and followed up to October 2016. Interventions: Nine centers (743 patients) were randomized to the multicomponent intervention, which included a community health worker-led home intervention (health coaching, home BP monitoring, and BP audit and feedback), a physician intervention, and a text-messaging intervention over 18 months. Nine centers (689 patients) were randomized to usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary outcomes were the differences in systolic and diastolic BP changes from baseline to the end of follow-up of patients with hypertension. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with controlled hypertension (BP <140/90 mm Hg). Three BP measurements were obtained at each of 2 baseline and 2 termination visits using a standard protocol, the means of which were used for analyses. Results: Of 1432 participants (mean age, 55.8 years [SD, 13.3]; 772 women [53.0%]), 1357 (94.8%) completed the trial. Baseline mean systolic BP was 151.7 mm Hg for the intervention group and 149.8 mm Hg for the usual care group; the mean diastolic BP was 92.2 mm Hg for the intervention group and 90.1 mm Hg for the usual care group. Systolic BP reduction from baseline to month 18 was 19.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 17.9-20.8 mm Hg) for the intervention group and 12.7 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.3-14.2 mm Hg) for the usual care group; the difference in the reduction was 6.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.6-8.6; P < .001). Diastolic BP decreased by 12.2 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.2-13.2 mm Hg) in the intervention group and 6.9 mm Hg (95% CI, 5.9-7.8 mm Hg) in the control group; the difference in the reduction was 5.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.0-6.8 mm Hg; P < .001). The proportion of patients with controlled hypertension increased from 17.0% at baseline to 72.9% at 18 months in the intervention group and from 17.6% to 52.2% in the usual care group; the difference in the increase was 20.6% (95% CI, 15.4%-25.9%; P < .001). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: Low-income patients in Argentina with uncontrolled hypertension who participated in a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention experienced a greater decrease in systolic and diastolic BP than did patients who received usual care over 18 months. Further research is needed to assess generalizability and cost-effectiveness of this intervention and to understand which components may have contributed most to the outcome. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01834131.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2017.11358

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Gu D He J Coxson PG Rasmussen PW Huang C Thanataveerat A The cost-effectiveness of low-cost essential antihypertensive medicines for hypertension control in China: a modelling study PLoS Med 2015 12 8 e1001860 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001860 26241895 PMC4524696 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, J., Irazola, V., Mills, K. T., Poggio, R., Beratarrechea, A., Dolan, J., Chen, C.-S., Gibbons, L., Krousel-Wood, M., Bazzano, L. A., Nejamis, A., Gulayin, P., Santero, M., Augustovski, F., Chen, J., Rubinstein, A., & for the HCPIA Investigators
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (AR)
  • Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Corresponding author
He, Jiang
Venue
JAMA
Published
2017-09-19
Volume
318
Issue
11
Pages
1016
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2756932910
Cited by
241
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL114197)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM109036)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
hypertension, blood pressure control, community health workers, multicomponent intervention, low-income patients, home blood pressure monitoring, audit and feedback, health coaching, text messaging, primary care, uninsured patients, Argentina, uncontrolled hypertension, physician intervention, low- and middle-income countries, free medication, social determinants of health
MeSH terms
Adult, Argentina, Blood Pressure, Community Health Workers, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Primary Health Care, Urban Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review