Cited by 543Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access

Abstract

Importance: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to be beneficial for adults with type 2 diabetes using intensive insulin therapy, but its use in type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin has not been well studied. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of CGM in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin in primary care practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 15 centers in the US (enrollment from July 30, 2018, to October 30, 2019; follow-up completed July 7, 2020) and included adults with type 2 diabetes receiving their diabetes care from a primary care clinician and treated with 1 or 2 daily injections of long- or intermediate-acting basal insulin without prandial insulin, with or without noninsulin glucose-lowering medications. Interventions: Random assignment 2:1 to CGM (n = 116) or traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) monitoring (n = 59). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level at 8 months. Key secondary outcomes were CGM-measured time in target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL, time with glucose level at greater than 250 mg/dL, and mean glucose level at 8 months. Results: Among 175 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 57 [9] years; 88 women [50%]; 92 racial/ethnic minority individuals [53%]; mean [SD] baseline HbA1c level, 9.1% [0.9%]), 165 (94%) completed the trial. Mean HbA1c level decreased from 9.1% at baseline to 8.0% at 8 months in the CGM group and from 9.0% to 8.4% in the BGM group (adjusted difference, -0.4% [95% CI, -0.8% to -0.1%]; P = .02). In the CGM group, compared with the BGM group, the mean percentage of CGM-measured time in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL was 59% vs 43% (adjusted difference, 15% [95% CI, 8% to 23%]; P < .001), the mean percentage of time at greater than 250 mg/dL was 11% vs 27% (adjusted difference, -16% [95% CI, -21% to -11%]; P < .001), and the means of the mean glucose values were 179 mg/dL vs 206 mg/dL (adjusted difference, -26 mg/dL [95% CI, -41 to -12]; P < .001). Severe hypoglycemic events occurred in 1 participant (1%) in the CGM group and in 1 (2%) in the BGM group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin, continuous glucose monitoring, as compared with blood glucose meter monitoring, resulted in significantly lower HbA1c levels at 8 months. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03566693.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2021.7444

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 543

Metadata

Authors
Martens, T., Beck, R. W., Bailey, R., Ruedy, K. J., Calhoun, P., Peters, A. L., Pop-Busui, R., Philis-Tsimikas, A., Bao, S., Umpierrez, G., Davis, G., Kruger, D., Bhargava, A., Young, L., McGill, J. B., Aleppo, G., Nguyen, Q. T., Orozco, I., Biggs, W., Lucas, K. J., Polonsky, W. H., Buse, J. B., Price, D., Bergenstal, R. M., MOBILE Study Group, Carlson, A., Chambers, S., Yang, S., Kirkman, M. S., Kass, A., Fraser, R., Cushman, T., Ramos, C., Magar, M., Walker, M., Serafin-Dokhan, S., Salam, M., Hurst, S., Clifton, M. J., Kravarusic, J., Bansal, A., Fulkerson, C., Ang, L., Richardson, C., Mizokami-Stout, K., Reiss, J., Leone, V., Stifel, K., Dailey, G., Change, A., McCallum, J., Garcia, M. I., Davis, D., Lovell, C., Root, C., Toler, F., Wilhelm, L., Eifert, R., Murguia, L., Cota, B., Nguyen, L., Lipski, R., Lawrence, M. K., Fournier, A., Carter, M., Hoover, S., Cohen, N., Mouse, T., Rusnak, J., Campos, T., Njeru, N., Arant, T., Beck, S. E., & Balo, A.
Affiliations
  • Park Nicollet Health Services (US)
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
  • Iowa Diabetes Research, West Des Moines
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Las Vegas Endocrinology, Henderson, Nevada
  • Carteret General Hospital (US)
  • Amarillo Medical Specialists, Amarillo, Texas
  • Diabetes & Endocrinology Consultants PC, Morehead City, North Carolina
  • Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California
  • Dexcom (United States) (US)
  • HealthPartners (US)
  • for the MOBILE Study Group
Corresponding author
Beck, Roy W.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2021-06-08
Volume
325
Issue
22
Pages
2262
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3164064295
Cited by
543
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 24
FWCI
54.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001422)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926, P30DK020572, P30DK124723, P30DK111022)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, type 2 diabetes, basal insulin, glycemic control, HbA1c, blood glucose meters, time in target glucose range, primary care, intensive insulin therapy, glycemic variability, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, HbA1c reduction, HbA1c variability
MeSH terms
Glycemic Control, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Confidence Intervals, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Sample Size, Postprandial Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review