The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Informed Consent for Population-Based Research Involving Genetics
Abstract
Bridging the gap between gene discovery and our ability to use genetic information to benefit health requires population-based knowledge about the contribution of common gene variants and gene-environment interactions to the risk of disease. The risks and benefits associated with population-based research involving genetics, especially lower-penetrance gene variants, can differ in nature from those associated with family-based research. In response to the urgent need for appropriate guidelines, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention formed a multidisciplinary group to develop an informed consent approach for integrating genetic variation into population-based research. The group used expert opinion and federal regulations, the National Bioethics Advisory Commission's report on research involving human biological materials, existing consent forms, and literature on informed consent to create suggested language for informed consent documents and a supplemental brochure. This language reflects the premise that the probability and magnitude of harm, as well as possible personal benefits, are directly related to the meaning of the results for the health of the participant and that appropriate disclosures and processes for obtaining consent should be based on an assessment at the outset of the likelihood that the results will generate information that could lead directly to an evidence-based intervention. This informed consent approach is proposed to promote discussion about how best to enable potential participants to make informed decisions about population-based research involving genetics and to suggest issues for consideration by research sponsors, institutional review boards, and investigators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing Genetic Risks: Implications for Health and Social Policy
(1994) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/2057 · Cited by 372
Protecting Communities in Biomedical Research
Weijer, C., & Emanuel, E. J. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5482.1142 · Cited by 288
Informed Consent for Genetic Research on Stored Tissue Samples
Clayton, E. W. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530220052033 · Cited by 283
Harper, P. S. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 227
Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research
Botkin, J. R. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.2.207 · Cited by 153
Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Lerman, C. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195322934.001.0001 · Cited by 124
Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetics exceptionalism.
Gostin, L. O., & Hodge, J. G. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 82
Fuller, B. P., Kahn, M. J. E., Barr, P. A., Biesecker, L., Crowley, E., Garber, J. E., Mansoura, M. K., Murphy, P. D., Murray, J., Phillips, J., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5432.1359 · Cited by 65
BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations and risk of breast cancer:
Coughlin, S. S., Khoury, M. J., & STEINBERG, K. K. (1999) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00136-6 · Cited by 48
IRB Review and Consent in Human Tissue Research
Merz, J. F., Leonard, D. G. B., & Miller, E. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5408.1647 · Cited by 38
Cited by
Robson, M. E., Bradbury, A. R., Arun, B., Domchek, S. M., Ford, J. M., Hampel, H. L., Lipkin, S. M., Syngal, S., Wollins, D. S., & Lindor, N. M. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.0996 · Cited by 934
Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations
Wolf, S. M., Lawrenz, F. P., Nelson, C. A., Kahn, J. P., Cho, M. K., Clayton, E. W., Fletcher, J. G., Georgieff, M. K., Hammerschmidt, D., Hudson, K., et al. (2008) · Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00266.x · Cited by 706
Public Opinion about the Importance of Privacy in Biobank Research
Kaufman, D. J., Murphy-Bollinger, J., Scott, J., & Hudson, K. L. (2009) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.002 · Cited by 279
Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research
Murphy, J., Scott, J., Kaufman, D., Geller, G., LeRoy, L., & Hudson, K. (2008) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265160802513093 · Cited by 278
The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research
Kaye, J. (2012) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Beskow, L. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-11-14
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2315
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2062261954
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Informed Consent for Population-Based Research Involving Genetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.286.18.2315
- The paper
- Beskow, L. M. (2001). Informed Consent for Population-Based Research Involving Genetics. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.18.2315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.