Cited by 14Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Time and Clerical Burden Posed by the Current Electronic Health Record for Orthopaedic Surgeons

Kesler, Kyle, Wynn, Malynda, Pugely, Andrew J.·2022·Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Abstract

Introduction The electronic health record (EHR) has become an integral part of modern medical practice. The balance of benefit versus burden of a required EHR remains inconclusive, with many studies identifying increasing physician burnout and less face-to-face patient contact because of increasing documentation demands. Few studies have investigated EHR burden in orthopaedic surgery practice. This study aimed to characterize and compare EHR usage patterns and time allocation within EHR between orthopaedic surgeons, other surgeons, and medicine physicians at an academic medical center. Methods EHR usage was digitally tracked within a large academic medical center. EHR usage data were compiled for all physicians seeing outpatients from April 2018 to June 2019. The tracking metrics included time spent answering messages, typing notes, reviewing laboratories and imaging, reading notes, and placing orders. Physicians were subdivided between orthopaedic surgeons, other surgeons, and nonsurgeon/medical specialties. Statistical comparisons using a two-sample t-test were done between orthopaedic surgeon EHR usage patterns and other surgeons, in addition to orthopaedic surgeons versus nonsurgeons. Results One thousand sixty physicians including 28 full-time orthopaedic surgeons, 134 other surgeons, and 898 nonsurgical medicine physicians met inclusion criteria. Orthopaedic surgeons saw on average 31 patients per office day compared with other surgeons at 18 patients per office day (P…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00094

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kesler, K., Wynn, M., & Pugely, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
Corresponding author
Kesler, Kyle
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Published
2021-09-30
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
e34-e43
ISSN
  • 1067-151X (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-5480
OpenAlex
W3202342061
Cited by
14
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
electronic health records, orthopaedic surgeons, physician time allocation, note writing, physician burnout
MeSH terms
Orthopedic Surgeons, Burnout, Professional, Documentation, Humans, Electronic Health Records, Surgeons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review