Cited by 162Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Association of light physical activity measured by accelerometry and incidence of coronary heart disease and cardiovascular disease in older women

Open access
LaCroix, Andrea Z., Bellettiere, John, Rillamas-Sun, Eileen, Di, Chongzhi, Evenson, Kelly R., Lewis, Cora E., Buchner, David M., Stefanick, Marcia L. +4 more·2019·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: To our knowledge, no studies have examined light physical activity (PA) measured by accelerometry and heart disease in older women. Objective: To investigate whether higher levels of light PA were associated with reduced risks of coronary heart disease (CHD) or cardiovascular disease (CVD) in older women. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort study of older women from baseline (March 2012 to April 2014) through February 28, 2017, for up to 4.91 years. The setting was community-dwelling participants from the Women's Health Initiative. Participants were ambulatory women with no history of myocardial infarction or stroke. Exposures: Data from accelerometers worn for a requested 7 days were used to measure light PA. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for physician-adjudicated CHD and CVD events across light PA quartiles adjusting for possible confounders. Light PA was also analyzed as a continuous variable with and without adjustment for moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA). Results: Among 5861 women (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [6.7] years), 143 CHD events and 570 CVD events were observed. The HRs for CHD in the highest vs lowest quartiles of light PA were 0.42 (95% CI, 0.25-0.70; P for trend <.001) adjusted for age and race/ethnicity and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.34-0.99; P for trend = .004) after additional adjustment for education, current smoking, alcohol consumption, physical functioning, comorbidity, and self-rated health. Corresponding HRs for CVD in the highest vs lowest quartiles of light PA were 0.63 (95% CI, 0.49-0.81; P for trend <.001) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.60-1.00; P for trend = .004). The HRs for a 1-hour/day increment in light PA after additional adjustment for MVPA were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.73-1.00; P for trend = .05) for CHD and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.99; P for trend = .03) for CVD. Conclusions and Relevance: The present findings support the conclusion that all movement counts for the prevention of CHD and CVD in older women. Large, pragmatic randomized trials are needed to test whether increasing light PA among older women reduces cardiovascular risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0419

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The existing evidence regarding associations between light-intensity physical activity and risks for developing cardiovascular events in the general population is conflicting.

    “The existing evidence regarding associations between LPA and risks for developing cardiovascular events in the general population is conflicting.13, 14, 15, 16”

    From Accelerometer-measured physical activity, sedentary behavior, and incidence of macrovascular and microvascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion reports inconsistent previous findings on light physical activity and cardiovascular mortality, which supports the claim that some cardiovascular evidence was conflicting. But the Introduction says no studies had yet evaluated light physical activity and incident CHD or CVD in adults overall. The paper therefore does not support describing evidence about *developing cardiovascular events* in the general population as conflicting. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]National Center for Health Statistics Health, United States, 2016: With Chartbook on Long-term Trends in Health. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; May 2017. 28910066

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaCroix, A. Z., Bellettiere, J., Rillamas-Sun, E., Di, C., Evenson, K. R., Lewis, C. E., Buchner, D. M., Stefanick, M. L., Lee, I.-M., Rosenberg, D. E., LaMonte, M. J., & (WHI), F. T. W. H. I.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
LaCroix, Andrea Z.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2019-03-15
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
e190419
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921167015
Cited by
162
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 11
FWCI
16.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Women's Health Initiative
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201600018C, HHSN268201600004C, HHSN268201600001C, HHSN268201600003C, HHSN268201600002C, R01HL130483, T32HL079891)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK079626)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
light physical activity, accelerometry, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular disease, older women, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, heart disease risk, Women's Health Initiative, community-dwelling women, physical activity measurement
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Reduction Behavior, Independent Living, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review